Author

Topic: Will bitcoins no longer be mined after 2024? (Read 307 times)

legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 2066
Assuming that someone will use Bitcoin in the 2140, miners will earn bitcoins only from the transaction fees.
Is the fact that miners will get reward only from transaction fees means that mining won't be so profitable, or that fees will cost more?

The profitability of Bitcoin mining won't change, the network's hashrate will. The hashrate (or rather: the resources spent on Bitcoin mining) will depend on the total amount of transaction fees spent. The transaction fees will depend on the amount of people using Bitcoin.


Not necessarily. In the future, the volume for Bitcoin might increase substantially and more transactions can fit inside a block. That means for any given block, more fees would be collected collectively. It would depend largely on how far the scaling has gone though.

Oh yeah, and that too.
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 4193
Is the fact that miners will get reward only from transaction fees means that mining won't be so profitable, or that fees will cost more?
Not necessarily. In the future, the volume for Bitcoin might increase substantially and more transactions can fit inside a block. That means for any given block, more fees would be collected collectively. It would depend largely on how far the scaling has gone though.

If the efficiency of ASIC increases, the operating costs would be lower. If everything remains constant, then the difficulty would reach an equilibrium with the profits from the mining; if its too unprofitable, people stops mining and it becomes easier to mine and vice versa.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 14
The revolutionary Export system/One-click Export
Assuming that someone will use Bitcoin in the 2140, miners will earn bitcoins only from the transaction fees.
Is the fact that miners will get reward only from transaction fees means that mining won't be so profitable, or that fees will cost more?
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 3132
As I know, mining is a process of generating new blocks in blochchain. So, when all bitcoins will be generated, mining will still be mining. Coins just a rewards for them. Isn't it?

Yes, miners are rewarded for each solved block + they get all the fees from transactions that were included in the block. Assuming that someone will use Bitcoin in the 2140, miners will earn bitcoins only from the transaction fees.

Even after PoS being implemented, coins are going to be mined. It just doesn't require work anymore (which does require electricity) but staking coins.

To be more specific, it's rather called forging than mining. It still requires some electricity, but definitely way less than PoW.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 14
The revolutionary Export system/One-click Export
With ethereum moving towards Casper Proof of Stake you wonder if or when Bitcoin will follow suite. With the environmental impact and increasing cost of mining it's probably inevitable.

Ether is still going to be mined. Mining describe the process of 'generating' new coins.
PoW and PoS are just 'ways' to control the creation of new coins.
Even after PoS being implemented, coins are going to be mined. It just doesn't require work anymore (which does require electricity) but staking coins.

As I know, mining is a process of generating new blocks in blochchain. So, when all bitcoins will be generated, mining will still be mining. Coins just a rewards for them. Isn't it?
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 882
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
I'd highly recommend to press the ignore-button at the left side of his post.
I literally did this 5 minutes ago, and already have the subjective impresson of the forum being 'cleaner' regarding shitposts and a rapid growth in IQ-average here.

It's actually amusing arguing with Anti-Cen. When you point out the fallacy of their argument they start by trying to just ignore it and carry on making the same false claim. But if you keep pressing them on their falsehoods then eventually they run away for a couple of weeks and then come back and pretend nothing happened.



Do you imply that most cryptocurrency use "Bankers" system since the protocol force user (or wallet include fee by default) to pay fees on transaction?

Anti-Cen likes to try and throw in 'Bank' as often as possible as it goes against everything Bitcoin is about. But he fails to understand that charging fees makes someone a money transmitter and that in no way meets the definition of a bank.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bank#h47386879896420

Quote
bank2

NOUN
1 A financial establishment that uses money deposited by customers for investment, pays it out when required, makes loans at interest, and exchanges currency.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1129
Bitcoin FTW!
PoS hasn’t been implemented successfully in any coin as of now, and unless we see significant advantages and improvements on PoS, BTC will likely continue be on PoW. It’ll be interesting to see how successful PoS will be on Ethereum’s Casper protocol when it’s fully implemented. No solution, especially those with scaling and proof systems, is ever perfect with Crypto, but we’re always open to improvements.

Edited for a small grammar correction to clarify first sentence.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
With ethereum moving towards Casper Proof of Stake you wonder if or when Bitcoin will follow suite. With the environmental impact and increasing cost of mining it's probably inevitable.

Ether is still going to be mined. Mining describe the process of 'generating' new coins.
PoW and PoS are just 'ways' to control the creation of new coins.
Even after PoS being implemented, coins are going to be mined. It just doesn't require work anymore (which does require electricity) but staking coins.





Well if they are not mining coins and rely on fees then should we not just rename them to something more
appropriate like "Bankers" to save all the confusion.
Because charging fees alone doesn't make something a bank. You should know that by now with the number of times I've explained it to you.

I'd highly recommend to press the ignore-button at the left side of his post.
I literally did this 5 minutes ago, and already have the subjective impresson of the forum being 'cleaner' regarding shitposts and a rapid growth in IQ-average here.

Yes staking instead of work, sorry I should have been clearer
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2481
With ethereum moving towards Casper Proof of Stake you wonder if or when Bitcoin will follow suite. With the environmental impact and increasing cost of mining it's probably inevitable.

Ether is still going to be mined. Mining describe the process of 'generating' new coins.
PoW and PoS are just 'ways' to control the creation of new coins.
Even after PoS being implemented, coins are going to be mined. It just doesn't require work anymore (which does require electricity) but staking coins.





Well if they are not mining coins and rely on fees then should we not just rename them to something more
appropriate like "Bankers" to save all the confusion.
Because charging fees alone doesn't make something a bank. You should know that by now with the number of times I've explained it to you.

I'd highly recommend to press the ignore-button at the left side of his post.
I literally did this 5 minutes ago, and already have the subjective impresson of the forum being 'cleaner' regarding shitposts and a rapid growth in IQ-average here.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
With ethereum moving towards Casper Proof of Stake you wonder if or when Bitcoin will follow suite. With the environmental impact and increasing cost of mining it's probably inevitable.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 363
39twH4PSYgDSzU7sLnRoDfthR6gWYrrPoD
what about the btc after it no btc to mining?
there will no miners and how to keep the net active?
Miners will be rewarded with transaction fees only when that happens.
sr. member
Activity: 375
Merit: 250
what about the btc after it no btc to mining?
there will no miners and how to keep the net active?
newbie
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
I think the mistake you are making is deducting instead of halving.

The estimated year is 2140. You can view the reward schedule here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12tR_9WrY0Hj4AQLoJYj9EDBzfA38XIVLQSOOOVePNm0/edit#gid=0

Thanks for this info, the spreadsheet was really useful!
sr. member
Activity: 629
Merit: 258
I think the mistake you are making is deducting instead of halving.

The estimated year is 2140. You can view the reward schedule here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12tR_9WrY0Hj4AQLoJYj9EDBzfA38XIVLQSOOOVePNm0/edit#gid=0

Thank you . I wasn't sure but I suspected it did go further, but I found it hard to find information to confirm this.

I think I also went wrong because I kept seeing that the total amount would be just under 21m. I now realise that if you keep halving you never quite reach the "target", so yes you were right I was not getting the "halving."

Thanks again
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
I think the mistake you are making is deducting instead of halving.

The estimated year is 2140. You can view the reward schedule here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12tR_9WrY0Hj4AQLoJYj9EDBzfA38XIVLQSOOOVePNm0/edit#gid=0
sr. member
Activity: 629
Merit: 258
Will bitcoins no longer be mined after 2024?  (or thereabouts).

The block reward is now 12.5 BTC. On or around 2020 it will reduce to 6.25 until around 2024.

After 4 years of 6.25 block rewards are not more bitcoins mined?

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Controlled_supply
Jump to: