Will Kepler be good at mining? More cores in new architecture

wogaut

donator

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: ensign_lee on March 22, 2012, 10:02:49 AM

lol, I did a CTRL + F on the front page for 680 and didn't come up with anything. Le sad. Fail on me. haha

Shouda tried to search 'Kepler' in the search box instead.

At the time many speculations started, we didn't even know for sure that the 680 would be the first Kepler card released. Also, you have it in your subject heading.

ensign_lee

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 500

lol, I did a CTRL + F on the front page for 680 and didn't come up with anything. Le sad. Fail on me. haha

wogaut

donator

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: ensign_lee on March 22, 2012, 08:17:08 AM

So the GTX 680 is launching with 1536 CUDA cores, compared to its predecessor the GTX 580 with with 512.

Since NVidia was always so much worse than AMD because it used fewer, but stronger cores, will this make Nvidia actually viable for mining?

Please post in one of the other existing topics (the search function is your friend!)

Such as:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--63518
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gk104-nvidias-kepler-to-be-the-first-mining-card-69105
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/preliminary-gtx-680-test-results-toms-hardware-forwarded-to-xtreme-systems-70127
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680-specs-leaked-67616
...

Dexter770221

legendary

Activity: 1029

Merit: 1000

Thera are few other topics with same question. Simple answer: NO!
nVidia still sucks when comes to mining.

ensign_lee

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 500

So the GTX 680 is launching with 1536 CUDA cores, compared to its predecessor the GTX 580 with with 512.

Since NVidia was always so much worse than AMD because it used fewer, but stronger cores, will this make Nvidia actually viable for mining?

Topic: Will Kepler be good at mining? More cores in new architecture (Read 2273 times)