Author

Topic: Will we need a pool for smaller pools? (Read 1232 times)

donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1054
July 18, 2011, 01:32:26 PM
#7
it's called multiclone, see the thread
Multiclone is something completely different.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
July 18, 2011, 01:29:28 PM
#6
it's called multiclone, see the thread
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1001
July 18, 2011, 12:29:26 PM
#5
if the price of BTC keeps falling steadily.. mining by yourself with 2-5 gh/s might be feasible for
many moons to come as i would expect difficulty to level out. Maybe even go down. who knows.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1008
July 18, 2011, 12:27:06 PM
#4
 Actually, we already need service like that. It may be called "Anti-Deepbit coalition".
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
July 18, 2011, 03:16:20 AM
#3
oh, thats perfect! thanks!
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1054
July 18, 2011, 03:11:05 AM
#2
In the not so distant future when finding block in a somewhat decent time requires several TH/s The creation of a new successful pool will be extremely difficult and ineffective. Do you think we will need a service which can join multiple smaller pools into a single larger pool to help control the variance?
Yes. (Semi-)decentralized pools like p2pool should work nicely as the larger pool.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
July 18, 2011, 03:01:58 AM
#1
In the not so distant future when finding block in a somewhat decent time requires several TH/s The creation of a new successful pool will be extremely difficult and ineffective. Do you think we will need a service which can join multiple smaller pools into a single larger pool to help control the variance?
Jump to: