Winklevoss: Trying to pump before they dump?

jzcjca00

sr. member

Activity: 263

Merit: 250

Quote from: CygnusX1 on December 22, 2013, 02:26:24 PM

it is next to impossible right now for 401k and IRA money to invest in bitcoin.

It does require some expense and effort to invest 401k and IRA money in bitcoins, but I think "next to impossible" is an overstatement.

There are companies (like http://www.broadfinancial.com/self-directed-ira) that for about $1500 will help you set up a self-directed IRA and an IRA LLC investment company. You manage the IRA LLC and have a wide range of investment options. They are commonly used for holding real estate in IRAs, but bitcoins are 100% legal, as well.

If you do this with a Roth IRA, as long as you follow the rules and don't withdraw until age 59 1/2, you will never have to pay any taxes on the gains! So if you transfer or rollover $10,000 to a Roth IRA LLC, and bitcoin goes up by a factor of 1000, you wind up with $1 million completely tax free!

I think it's worth a small investment of time and money up front to avoid paying capital gains taxes on the potentially huge gains bitcoin may bring us!

See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-and-why-to-hold-bitcoins-in-your-roth-ira-yes-you-can-do-it-today-396783 for details.

Corelianer

full member

Activity: 309

Merit: 100

Quote from: iluvpie60 on December 22, 2013, 01:34:12 PM

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:03:15 PM

PUMP:

"The brothers are unsurprisingly bullish on Bitcoin. Cameron’s conservative bet is that its US dollar valuation will surpass $40,000 per coin — a potentially colossal figure — as he explained in a response to one Reddit user: "small bull case scenario for Bitcoin is a 400 billion USD dollar market cap, so 40,000 USD a coin, but I believe it could be much larger. When this will happen, if it happens, I don’t know, but if it happens, it will probably happen much faster than anyone imagines.""

DUMP:

"The twins are in the process of setting up the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, a listed fund to manage their Bitcoin wealth and bring greater legitimacy to the virtual currency. Papers for the initial public offering were filed in July, but the final decision is still pending. Due to regulations, Cameron was unable to discuss the trust in the AMA"

http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/12/15/winklevoss-twin-says-bitcoin-valuation-will-top-40k-plays-down-silk-road-closure/#!p2vds

"In a move that could come to mark a major new era for the virtual currency, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss have filed to float their stash of Bitcoins on a conventional stock exchange. The former Olympic rowers have lodged papers for a $20m initial public offering of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, which holds their Bitcoin wealth, and would be managed by the Winklevoss' investment fund, Math-Based Asset Services. "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/currency/10157710/Winklevoss-twins-20m-plan-to-make-Bitcoin-mainstream.html

Obviously they want the price to be as high as possible, before they dump via this fund. This is a clever tactic, as the dumping via a trust can support the price (wow new trust, look at the adoption) and you can get rid of your coins. If you dump on an exchange it leads to total collapse.

If they are so convinced of this high price, why sell the position. Sounds like a scam to me.

They are going to sell because they, unlike you all, understand Bitcoins will get completely fing trashed by altcoins. Bitcoins will never be worth more than 2,000 per. Altcoins are already better/faster transaction speed/less fees/use less energy/can be supported by less miners/blocks are generated faster.

You got to be a fing complete idiot to think your Bitcoins are going to be the number 1 coin forever. Within 2 years Nobody will give a flying F about Bitcoins. It will be all about Altcoins because they are better in every way. The more and more people who get into it, the more and more people will see that Bitcoins have no benefits over lets say, Feathercoin, and Peercoin.

PS I like swearing. Wink

lol idk.

Altcoins are just Copycats that try to profit from the success of Bitcoin and if Bitcoin fails, all other Altcoins will fail. There is a huge ammount of money bond into Bitcoin, they are unlikely to move to another Crypto because the success of Bitcoin is not that the technical specifications are better than the other Altcoins, but that the people have gained trust over time.

I will tell you we will see the prices of Altcoins disconnecting from the Bitcoin price, when people realize they can make more with the original.
And then slowly we will see some Altcoins dissapear.

timmmers

sr. member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 265

Personally I think they are in too deep to dump. Nothing to do with the economics as such, more their reputation.
They have been so strong for so long about their belief in bitcoin that their reputation would be damaged badly by a u-turn made to make a few bucks. Who'd trust a word they said in the future..assuming they intend to stay in some financial business in their long futures? "Oh they said that about bitcoins just before they jumped ship" would be said about whatever else they supported or got involved in.

undeadbitcoiner

sr. member

Activity: 896

Merit: 272

Undeadbitcoiner Will not DIE until 1BTC=50K

Price will reach 40,000+ there is no any doubt but If the really want Price to reach 40K very soon as fast as anyone can imagine then they must move there Bitcoins, If bitcoin moves and its traded widely then in a way that is easily perceived or understood price will reach 50K + very soon.

nodroids

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Why would you doubt that BTC will go into the thousands when a. we've already been there in just 4 years, b. the paradigm is a factor of 10 more efficient than gold and other financial services for holding liquid reserves, c. the transparent blockchain hasn't even started to express it's innovative power for economics, d. governments have no choice but to QEternity or face the starving hordes, e. $1 Trillion would represent less than 1/10th of one percent of all repo, bonds, derivatives, deposits etc.,, markets hosted by the banks.

brush242

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: Frost000 on December 18, 2013, 10:05:10 AM

I seriously doubt that they'll simply dump everything they've got. Maybe a few coins here and there, but their entire position? Nope, no way.

They've been strong supporters for a while now and it really does seem genuine.

Agreed. For three reasons: A) No one who intends on doing such a thing--even if they are doing it ethically--does not file paperwork to insure that the DOJ generally, and the SEC particularly, watches them like a hawk. 2) Just by announcing it, they have millions of people that mine/invest watching them, very, very, carefully. And D) It's just another way to invest in BTC, just like any other investment, Mutual funds, index funds, SPDRs, what have you. If they set the program up such that they have a duty of fiduciary responsibility, that limits their options as well, period.

bitpop

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1060

I don't see them pumping or supporting us in any way

Hideyoshi

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

In this case there is no such pump. Winkelvoss were not why bitcoin price went up. They just made good decision at good time, and everyone else made price go up. They seem to understand why bitcoin is important, and why price will keep going up, and it would be against their self interests to dump what they believe in.

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4438

Merit: 3387

Quote from: Hideyoshi on December 22, 2013, 03:23:45 AM

This is not dumping. They will not be selling their bitcoins, they will be selling securities. They will still hold all bitcoins that they bought, but will simply allow others to invest in those bitcoins too.
...
At least this is how I understand their plan.

The trust works like this: The twins give their bitcoins to the trust in exchange for shares of the trust. Then, anyone that wants to buy shares in the trust buys shares from the twins through an exchange. That is how they dump their bitcoins (after pumping). When they deposit their bitcoins in the trust, they will no longer own those bitcoins (directly).

The argument that they are selling shares and not bitcoins is naive. It is like saying that if you sell a private key you aren't selling the bitcoins that it holds. The shares represent ownership of bitcoins, so they are selling bitcoins in effect when they sell their shares.

Finally, an explanation of pump and dump: someone buys shares/bitcoins/altcoins at a low price. Then they generate huge interest in the shares/bitcoins/altcoins through various methods (this is the "pump"). Then when the price has risen, they sell their shares/bitcoins/altcoins at the higher price (this is the dump). Note that the "dump" doesn't necessarily cause the price to drop. The drop usually comes afterward when the all the interest caused by the "pump" dissipates. Pump and dump is illegal when the "pump" consists of spreading and promoting lies and unrealistic expectations.

CygnusX1

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

1. Early adopters will need to liquidate some of their positions in order for bitcoin to appreciate. The rate that new coins are mined will not satisfy demand for new entrants. Major holders will have to sell off chunks of their position to newcomers allowing wealth to be more evenly distributed for the sake of the economy. The benefit though is that as new money flows into the economy, the value of each slice becomes much more valuable than it would if newcomers were not able to buy in.

2. A publicly traded trust is a brilliant way to get institutional money in the bitcoin system. Most of us can agree that one of the major issues holding back adoption of bitcoin is the difficulty of investing. Most people are not capable of figuring out all the steps to do it. There are also legal boundaries restricting where money can flow. For example, it is next to impossible right now for 401k and IRA money to invest in bitcoin. By creating a public trust, the Winklevoss are actually paving a path for these kinds of institutional funds to get into bitcoin. This is a win for anyone holding bitcoin.

It is naive to think that the Winklevoss are trying to scam. They are doing exactly what needs to be done to help grow the bitcoin economy. Yes, they will sell off some of their position and make money along the way but so will everyone else.

Adrian-x

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

Quote from: iluvpie60 on December 22, 2013, 01:34:12 PM

. Bitcoins will never be worth more than 2,000 per...

You got to be a fing complete idiot to think your Bitcoins are going to be the number 1 coin forever. Within 2 years Nobody will give a flying F about Bitcoins. It will be all about Altcoins...

We'll know this because Bitcointalk.org will change its name to altcointalk.org.

iluvpie60

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:03:15 PM

PUMP:

"The brothers are unsurprisingly bullish on Bitcoin. Cameron’s conservative bet is that its US dollar valuation will surpass $40,000 per coin — a potentially colossal figure — as he explained in a response to one Reddit user: "small bull case scenario for Bitcoin is a 400 billion USD dollar market cap, so 40,000 USD a coin, but I believe it could be much larger. When this will happen, if it happens, I don’t know, but if it happens, it will probably happen much faster than anyone imagines.""

DUMP:

"The twins are in the process of setting up the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, a listed fund to manage their Bitcoin wealth and bring greater legitimacy to the virtual currency. Papers for the initial public offering were filed in July, but the final decision is still pending. Due to regulations, Cameron was unable to discuss the trust in the AMA"

http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/12/15/winklevoss-twin-says-bitcoin-valuation-will-top-40k-plays-down-silk-road-closure/#!p2vds

"In a move that could come to mark a major new era for the virtual currency, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss have filed to float their stash of Bitcoins on a conventional stock exchange. The former Olympic rowers have lodged papers for a $20m initial public offering of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, which holds their Bitcoin wealth, and would be managed by the Winklevoss' investment fund, Math-Based Asset Services. "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/currency/10157710/Winklevoss-twins-20m-plan-to-make-Bitcoin-mainstream.html

Obviously they want the price to be as high as possible, before they dump via this fund. This is a clever tactic, as the dumping via a trust can support the price (wow new trust, look at the adoption) and you can get rid of your coins. If you dump on an exchange it leads to total collapse.

If they are so convinced of this high price, why sell the position. Sounds like a scam to me.

They are going to sell because they, unlike you all, understand Bitcoins will get completely fing trashed by altcoins. Bitcoins will never be worth more than 2,000 per. Altcoins are already better/faster transaction speed/less fees/use less energy/can be supported by less miners/blocks are generated faster.

You got to be a fing complete idiot to think your Bitcoins are going to be the number 1 coin forever. Within 2 years Nobody will give a flying F about Bitcoins. It will be all about Altcoins because they are better in every way. The more and more people who get into it, the more and more people will see that Bitcoins have no benefits over lets say, Feathercoin, and Peercoin.

PS I like swearing. Wink

lol idk.

Hideyoshi

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

This is not dumping. They will not be selling their bitcoins, they will be selling securities. They will still hold all bitcoins that they bought, but will simply allow others to invest in those bitcoins too.
To explain more specifically:
If they have many bitcoins, and sell them on market, these bitcoins will fill sell orders and will cause prices to fall. This is true. But they are not selling bitcoins directly on market, they are offering bitcoin backed securities at current price of bitcoins on market. So only possible market action is for people to buy "bitcoins" in form of these securities, and either keep the price same, or cause it to go up, depending on how they treat their system. If not many people buy these securities, they do not have to lower price to sell them off as quickly as possible, as they would if they were dumping bitcoins on exchange market. They already have bitcoins, and believe they will rise in value, so can earn income from that. They know that people will want to buy their product, and can wait patiently for those people to do so. And they can already make extra money on fees they will charge of those people who invested already.

At least this is how I understand their plan.

bitpop

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1060

They're Jews, they'll get to 40k

Lloydie

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

IMHO:

The Winklevii are young and rich. Their reputation counts a lot to them because they still need it.

Even if they relinquished some btcs into the ETF, its not a big deal. It would be better than dumping on the market.

The etf is likely to bring net new money into the system. Therefore, btcs should rise in price. Why would anyone dump an asset that is rising in value?

Regulatory risks can't be ignored, therefore they could be doing this to recoup initial funds invested plus profits. The etf removes the binary outcome for the Winklevii. They make money either way but they make more if btcs go to $40k.

Please check Btc usage growth rates on bitcoinpulse to see for yourself that Btc adoption is expanding very rapidly. If you were the Winklevii, would you dump? I wouldn't. However, I would try to remove the binary outcome due to regulatory changes beyond my control.

vadoff

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

They invested at ~$100. If they wanted to dump, I think they would've done it when it plateaued near $1200 for some time.
I've seen some of their AMAs, and it seems like they truly believe in the currency.

Not saying they won't dump... but probably not until the value hits at least $10k+.

kgo

hero member

Activity: 548

Merit: 500

Quote from: porc on December 20, 2013, 10:31:04 AM

Quote from: kgo on December 20, 2013, 09:58:52 AM

Quote from: odolvlobo on December 19, 2013, 03:24:43 PM

Quote from: yatsey87 on December 19, 2013, 03:17:58 PM

Have they said what they actually plan to do with their holdings? Are they going to keep them for x amount of time and then sell, or what?

There is no purpose in setting up the fund if they don't intend to sell the shares. They don't have to sell all of their shares, but they have an incentive to sell a large portion.

Sure there is. Administration fees. They could setup a fund completely independent of their personal holdings and buy bitcoins on the open market. They could put their funds in the ETF, and buy/sell for other people via the ETF without touching their own shares at all. They'll make a profit on admin fees regardless of whether they sell their personal stash.

Read the link.

"Winklevoss have filed to float their stash of Bitcoins on a conventional stock exchange."

Actual SEC filing doesn't say anything about where the bitcoins come from, and indicate there is no cap on the number of coins the trust can hold. It's not tied to their personal bitcoin holdings, although they could sell their bitcoins into the trust, line anyone else.

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4438

Merit: 3387

Quote from: Bostonbitcoin on December 20, 2013, 11:56:21 AM

... The Winklevoss bros would still own a majority share in the trust ...

I might have missed it but I don't see anything in the prospectus requiring the Winklevii to own a majority of the shares of the trust.

Bostonbitcoin

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

No, sorry, OP doesn't understand how the trust would work or how public markets work.

The Winklevoss bros would still own a majority share in the trust which would not only still own BTC but be REQUIRED to keep owning BTC by its prospectus.

yatsey87

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 509

Quote from: porc on December 20, 2013, 10:31:04 AM

Quote from: kgo on December 20, 2013, 09:58:52 AM

Quote from: odolvlobo on December 19, 2013, 03:24:43 PM

Quote from: yatsey87 on December 19, 2013, 03:17:58 PM

Have they said what they actually plan to do with their holdings? Are they going to keep them for x amount of time and then sell, or what?

There is no purpose in setting up the fund if they don't intend to sell the shares. They don't have to sell all of their shares, but they have an incentive to sell a large portion.

Sure there is. Administration fees. They could setup a fund completely independent of their personal holdings and buy bitcoins on the open market. They could put their funds in the ETF, and buy/sell for other people via the ETF without touching their own shares at all. They'll make a profit on admin fees regardless of whether they sell their personal stash.

Read the link.

"Winklevoss have filed to float their stash of Bitcoins on a conventional stock exchange."

So you can buy shares in a stash of Bitcoins?

porc

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: kgo on December 20, 2013, 09:58:52 AM

Quote from: odolvlobo on December 19, 2013, 03:24:43 PM

Quote from: yatsey87 on December 19, 2013, 03:17:58 PM

Have they said what they actually plan to do with their holdings? Are they going to keep them for x amount of time and then sell, or what?

There is no purpose in setting up the fund if they don't intend to sell the shares. They don't have to sell all of their shares, but they have an incentive to sell a large portion.

Sure there is. Administration fees. They could setup a fund completely independent of their personal holdings and buy bitcoins on the open market. They could put their funds in the ETF, and buy/sell for other people via the ETF without touching their own shares at all. They'll make a profit on admin fees regardless of whether they sell their personal stash.

Read the link.

"Winklevoss have filed to float their stash of Bitcoins on a conventional stock exchange."

kgo

hero member

Activity: 548

Merit: 500

Quote from: odolvlobo on December 19, 2013, 03:24:43 PM

Quote from: yatsey87 on December 19, 2013, 03:17:58 PM

Have they said what they actually plan to do with their holdings? Are they going to keep them for x amount of time and then sell, or what?

There is no purpose in setting up the fund if they don't intend to sell the shares. They don't have to sell all of their shares, but they have an incentive to sell a large portion.

Sure there is. Administration fees. They could setup a fund completely independent of their personal holdings and buy bitcoins on the open market. They could put their funds in the ETF, and buy/sell for other people via the ETF without touching their own shares at all. They'll make a profit on admin fees regardless of whether they sell their personal stash.

Noruka

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 253

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:34:06 PM

Quote from: chmod755 on December 16, 2013, 05:23:25 PM

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:03:15 PM

If they are so convinced of this high price, why sell the position.

Some (especially those with several billions or even trillions) might avoid Bitcoin as a currency with public information available about two people owning ~1% of it – knowing they bought "low" compared to the current exchange rate and they might need some money to get their IPO started. It simply can't go – or at least it won't stay at $40,000 with a wealth distribution like this – greed and the risk of someone dumping 1% holds it down – that's why you diversify…

That being said: I think their intentions are good.

Yes, this another major problem for bitcoin, however they cant solve it, as they are tiny in comparison to some other early adopters. We already have a huge one sided distribution in favor of early adopters, who hold over 50% of the bitcoin supply. This design was built in on purpose, Satoshi himself doesnt seem to mind otherwise he would have designed it differently. Again I find it peculiar to say the least, that they are so convinced of the $40000 price tag but already want to dump.

To me the explanation that they just want OUT is more straightforward than what you point to, as they cant fix the design flaw (if they think distribution is one).

you do realize that is how all long term investments work right!? the early adopters are the ones that put up the most risk and are the ones that benefit the most if the investment grows. Thats why there are people that become early adopters for higher risk and once the company/website/crypto coin becomes too mainstream they sell and move on to the next big hit. You could then technically say any investment, even a start-up company, is a "ponzi scheme" where the earlier investors make the majority of the money in the long term. How dare people buy in early to grow an investment!

/facepalm

yatsey87

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 509

Quote from: geerdt on December 19, 2013, 06:25:57 PM

Why would some rich entrepreneurs like them not feel the same way about BTC that we do?

I'm sure they do, but I think people just don't trust them or are suspicious. They seem fairly sound to me.

geerdt

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Why would some rich entrepreneurs like them not feel the same way about BTC that we do?

yatsey87

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 509

Quote from: odolvlobo on December 19, 2013, 03:24:43 PM

Quote from: yatsey87 on December 19, 2013, 03:17:58 PM

Have they said what they actually plan to do with their holdings? Are they going to keep them for x amount of time and then sell, or what?

There is no purpose in setting up the fund if they don't intend to sell the shares. They don't have to sell all of their shares, but they have an incentive to sell a large portion.

Quote from: yatsey87 on December 19, 2013, 03:17:58 PM

If the Winkle says he expects them to rise to 40k, surely they'll be keeping them to nearer that figure?

You don't know that they actually expect it to go that high. They may be telling everyone $40k, but actually plan to dump at $10k.

I wonder if they plan on holding them all with the view to sell, or slowly sell them off bit by bit over time? Have they stated what their plan for their holdings is?

And yeah, obviously 40k is pure speculation, but maybe they'll get rid after they hit a certain amount, like you said. I think 10k isn't too ridiculous a number for BTC, especially once it gains some mainstream acceptance.

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4438

Merit: 3387

Quote from: yatsey87 on December 19, 2013, 03:17:58 PM

Have they said what they actually plan to do with their holdings? Are they going to keep them for x amount of time and then sell, or what?

There is no purpose in setting up the fund if they don't intend to sell the shares. They don't have to sell all of their shares, but they have an incentive to sell a large portion.

Quote from: yatsey87 on December 19, 2013, 03:17:58 PM

If the Winkle says he expects them to rise to 40k, surely they'll be keeping them to nearer that figure?

You don't know that they actually expect it to go that high. They may be telling everyone $40k, but actually plan to dump at $10k.

yatsey87

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 509

Have they said what they actually plan to do with their holdings? Are they going to keep them for x amount of time and then sell, or what? If the Winkle says he expects them to rise to 40k, surely they'll be keeping them to nearer that figure?

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4438

Merit: 3387

Quote from: theecoinomist on December 19, 2013, 06:00:47 AM

That's preposterous and you know it OP.

It is an interesting spin on the facts, but it's not preposterous. It really depends on how much of their bitcoin hoard they deposit into the fund.

The twins own about 100 million BTC. Suppose they deposit the entire amount into the fund and 10,000 shares of the fund are sold per month. Here is a table showing their holdings:

Month	\| Bitcoins Held	\| Shares Held	\| Dollars Held (@$40k/BTC)
-1	100,000	0	0
0	0	100,000	$0
1	0	90,000	$400,000,000
2	0	80,000	$800,000,000
3	0	70,000	$1,200,000,000
4	0	60,000	$1,600,000,000
5	0	50,000	$2,000,000,000
6	0	40,000	$2,400,000,000
7	0	30,000	$2,800,000,000
8	0	20,000	$3,200,000,000
9	0	10,000	$3,600,000,000
10	0	0	$4,000,000,000

As you can see in this scenario, they have dumped their entire bitcoin hoard in 10 months by setting up the fund and selling all their shares.

theecoinomist

full member

Activity: 200

Merit: 100

That's preposterious and you know it OP, the Winklevii will of course sell off a portion and collect annual maintenance fee similar to the Exante Fund.

infinitybo

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Plus that's only open to accredited investors, with a minimum investment of 25k$.

porc

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Poor Winkleviii Cheesy

People are "out-dumping" them. LOL.

cbeast

donator

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1010

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.

They don't seem to be playing anything diabolical. They just seem like two regular egotistical overachieving privileged dudes that want to become tycoon billionaires. Tongue

Frost000

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

I seriously doubt that they'll simply dump everything they've got. Maybe a few coins here and there, but their entire position? Nope, no way.

They've been strong supporters for a while now and it really does seem genuine.

I_bitcoin

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:03:15 PM

PUMP:

"The brothers are unsurprisingly bullish on Bitcoin. Cameron’s conservative bet is that its US dollar valuation will surpass $40,000 per coin — a potentially colossal figure — as he explained in a response to one Reddit user: "small bull case scenario for Bitcoin is a 400 billion USD dollar market cap, so 40,000 USD a coin, but I believe it could be much larger. When this will happen, if it happens, I don’t know, but if it happens, it will probably happen much faster than anyone imagines.""

DUMP:

"The twins are in the process of setting up the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, a listed fund to manage their Bitcoin wealth and bring greater legitimacy to the virtual currency. Papers for the initial public offering were filed in July, but the final decision is still pending. Due to regulations, Cameron was unable to discuss the trust in the AMA"

http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/12/15/winklevoss-twin-says-bitcoin-valuation-will-top-40k-plays-down-silk-road-closure/#!p2vds

"In a move that could come to mark a major new era for the virtual currency, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss have filed to float their stash of Bitcoins on a conventional stock exchange. The former Olympic rowers have lodged papers for a $20m initial public offering of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, which holds their Bitcoin wealth, and would be managed by the Winklevoss' investment fund, Math-Based Asset Services. "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/currency/10157710/Winklevoss-twins-20m-plan-to-make-Bitcoin-mainstream.html

Obviously they want the price to be as high as possible, before they dump via this fund. This is a clever tactic, as the dumping via a trust can support the price (wow new trust, look at the adoption) and you can get rid of your coins. If you dump on an exchange it leads to total collapse.

If they are so convinced of this high price, why sell the position. Sounds like a scam to me.

They have been talking about this for quite some time. Reddit is not the first we have heard the proposal. FWIW...

Adrian-x

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:19:15 PM

Quote from: ajax3592 on December 16, 2013, 05:12:39 PM

Well on his AMA on reddit, Cameron was like I'mma hold em like SPARTAN ! He "sounded" like he was into it for long term.

Of course he sounded like this, he wants you to buy them after all.

Again, fact is that they are dumping their coins via this trust. They are selling a major part of their stack. If they believe the 40.000 dollar estimate is conservative, why sell?

To use the wealth, what good is wealth that can't be realized and when you realize it how much is enough?
Why take it from the community that made Bitcoin when you can help deflate the stock market bubble.

Sure it is pump and dump, the idea people will save there coins and die hungry is silly everyone will ~~sell~~ spend when the price is right.

Sindelar1938

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

Possible but I don't think the winklevii's actions make a difference to BTC long term
Wishful thinking possibly

psyclon

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:34:06 PM

Quote from: chmod755 on December 16, 2013, 05:23:25 PM

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:03:15 PM

If they are so convinced of this high price, why sell the position.

Some (especially those with several billions or even trillions) might avoid Bitcoin as a currency with public information available about two people owning ~1% of it – knowing they bought "low" compared to the current exchange rate and they might need some money to get their IPO started. It simply can't go – or at least it won't stay at $40,000 with a wealth distribution like this – greed and the risk of someone dumping 1% holds it down – that's why you diversify…

That being said: I think their intentions are good.

Yes, this another major problem for bitcoin, however they cant solve it, as they are tiny in comparison to some other early adopters. We already have a huge one sided distribution in favor of early adopters, who hold over 50% of the bitcoin supply. This design was built in on purpose, Satoshi himself doesnt seem to mind otherwise he would have designed it differently. Again I find it peculiar to say the least, that they are so convinced of the $40000 price tag but already want to dump.

To me the explanation that they just want OUT is more straightforward than what you point to, as they cant fix the design flaw (if they think distribution is one).

that guy could have made billion dollars if cashed out at top. the exchanges did make a lot too.

pand70

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 10:35:17 PM

Quote from: pand70 on December 16, 2013, 10:32:52 PM

Dumping when? Once bitcoin reaches 40000$ or when their etf becomes live?

Dumping as soon as the etf comes live. The etf is the vehicle for the twins to dump their holdings.

That doesn't makes sense. Obviously they can earn more dumping there rather on an exchange but not that more to justify the risk of waiting for the fund to approve if they believe that bitcoin is a pump and dump scheme.
They may dump some when bitcoin reaches 40000$ but who wouldn't Tongue

GoldWater

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 10:35:17 PM

Quote from: pand70 on December 16, 2013, 10:32:52 PM

Dumping when? Once bitcoin reaches 40000$ or when their etf becomes live?

Dumping as soon as the etf comes live. The etf is the vehicle for the twins to dump their holdings.

That's an extremely good point....

And yes, roughly 50% of Bitcoins have been mined but it's not the number of coins, rather the number of decimals....

porc

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: pand70 on December 16, 2013, 10:32:52 PM

Dumping when? Once bitcoin reaches 40000$ or when their etf becomes live?

Dumping as soon as the etf comes live. The etf is the vehicle for the twins to dump their holdings.

pand70

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Dumping when? Once bitcoin reaches 40000$ or when their etf becomes live?
In any case i have some second thoughts about the timing of this ama.

porc

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: gentlemand on December 16, 2013, 05:50:20 PM

I assume they want to get in on the ground floor of a new paradigm.

If they wanted to pump and dump they could stay under the radar and wreak havoc with a few million dollars here and there. They could do that tomorrow and not have to be pimping themselves in public and waiting for months on end to get going.

Lol no. The best dump is their method.

Nebulous

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:03:15 PM

PUMP:

"The brothers are unsurprisingly bullish on Bitcoin. Cameron’s conservative bet is that its US dollar valuation will surpass $40,000 per coin — a potentially colossal figure — as he explained in a response to one Reddit user: "small bull case scenario for Bitcoin is a 400 billion USD dollar market cap, so 40,000 USD a coin, but I believe it could be much larger. When this will happen, if it happens, I don’t know, but if it happens, it will probably happen much faster than anyone imagines.""

DUMP:

"The twins are in the process of setting up the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, a listed fund to manage their Bitcoin wealth and bring greater legitimacy to the virtual currency. Papers for the initial public offering were filed in July, but the final decision is still pending. Due to regulations, Cameron was unable to discuss the trust in the AMA"

http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/12/15/winklevoss-twin-says-bitcoin-valuation-will-top-40k-plays-down-silk-road-closure/#!p2vds

"In a move that could come to mark a major new era for the virtual currency, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss have filed to float their stash of Bitcoins on a conventional stock exchange. The former Olympic rowers have lodged papers for a $20m initial public offering of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, which holds their Bitcoin wealth, and would be managed by the Winklevoss' investment fund, Math-Based Asset Services. "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/currency/10157710/Winklevoss-twins-20m-plan-to-make-Bitcoin-mainstream.html

Obviously they want the price to be as high as possible, before they dump via this fund. This is a clever tactic, as the dumping via a trust can support the price (wow new trust, look at the adoption) and you can get rid of your coins. If you dump on an exchange it leads to total collapse.

If they are so convinced of this high price, why sell the position. Sounds like a scam to me.

Hmmm, I think your tin foil hat is cutting circulation to your brain now, try plastering the walls with aluminum instead

porc

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: chmod755 on December 16, 2013, 06:09:23 PM

Where did get this number?

50% of bitcoins have been mined already.

porc

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 16, 2013, 05:47:55 PM

Why would they want out ... they already have hundreds of millions in other assets, this is a relatively small play, however it could become huge for them. If they were to leave it now then do they have something better lined up? What would you suggest that is US T-bonds? Shares? Hampton housing?

Your wild accusations make zero sense from the ground up. Their best course of action right now is stay put, ride the bull, maybe diversify some into bitcoin ancillary services, imho.

Well they are selling their bitcoin stake. Read my post.

chmod755

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1021

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:34:06 PM

Yes, this another major problem for bitcoin, however they cant solve it, as they are tiny in comparison to some other early adopters. We already have a huge one sided distribution in favor of early adopters, who hold over 50% of the bitcoin supply. This design was built in on purpose, Satoshi himself doesnt seem to mind otherwise he would have designed it differently. Again I find it peculiar to say the least, that they are so convinced of the $40000 price tag but already want to dump.

Where did you get this number? It seems difficult to estimate the amount of Bitcoins that has been destroyed permanently and to see how the distribution of Bitcoins on exchanges and other services breaks down and how addresses belonging to the same person are connected… Of course: if your money is on an exchange it's technically a single place in control of it…

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 3014

Welt Am Draht

I assume they want to get in on the ground floor of a new paradigm.

If they wanted to pump and dump they could stay under the radar and wreak havoc with a few million dollars here and there. They could do that tomorrow and not have to be pimping themselves in public and waiting for months on end to get going.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Why would they want out ... they already have hundreds of millions in other assets, this is a relatively small play, however it could become huge for them. If they were to leave it now then do they have something better lined up? What would you suggest that is US T-bonds? Shares? Hampton housing?

Your wild accusations make zero sense from the ground up. Their best course of action right now is stay put, ride the bull, maybe diversify some into bitcoin ancillary services, imho.

porc

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: chmod755 on December 16, 2013, 05:23:25 PM

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:03:15 PM

If they are so convinced of this high price, why sell the position.

Some (especially those with several billions or even trillions) might avoid Bitcoin as a currency with public information available about two people owning ~1% of it – knowing they bought "low" compared to the current exchange rate and they might need some money to get their IPO started. It simply can't go – or at least it won't stay at $40,000 with a wealth distribution like this – greed and the risk of someone dumping 1% holds it down – that's why you diversify…

That being said: I think their intentions are good.

Yes, this another major problem for bitcoin, however they cant solve it, as they are tiny in comparison to some other early adopters. We already have a huge one sided distribution in favor of early adopters, who hold over 50% of the bitcoin supply. This design was built in on purpose, Satoshi himself doesnt seem to mind otherwise he would have designed it differently. Again I find it peculiar to say the least, that they are so convinced of the $40000 price tag but already want to dump.

To me the explanation that they just want OUT is more straightforward than what you point to, as they cant fix the design flaw (if they think distribution is one).

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4438

Merit: 3387

It really depends on how much of their hoard they are selling. It makes a lot of sense to sell a portion of your bitcoins in order to increase adoption if it greatly increases the value of the bitcoins you hold onto.

chmod755

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1021

Quote from: porc on December 16, 2013, 05:03:15 PM

If they are so convinced of this high price, why sell the position.

Some (especially those with several billions or even trillions) might avoid Bitcoin as a currency with public information available about two people owning ~1% of it – knowing they bought "low" compared to the current exchange rate and they might need some money to get their IPO started. It simply can't go – or at least it won't stay at $40,000 with a wealth distribution like this – greed and the risk of someone dumping 1% holds it down – that's why you diversify…

That being said: I think their intentions are good.

porc

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: ajax3592 on December 16, 2013, 05:12:39 PM

Well on his AMA on reddit, Cameron was like I'mma hold em like SPARTAN ! He "sounded" like he was into it for long term.

Of course he sounded like this, he wants you to buy them after all.

Again, fact is that they are dumping their coins via this trust. They are selling a major part of their stack. If they believe the 40.000 dollar estimate is conservative, why sell?

ajax3592

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto News & Tutorials - Coinramble.com

Well on his AMA on reddit, Cameron was like I'mma hold em like SPARTAN ! He "sounded" like he was into it for long term.

porc

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

PUMP:

"The brothers are unsurprisingly bullish on Bitcoin. Cameron’s conservative bet is that its US dollar valuation will surpass $40,000 per coin — a potentially colossal figure — as he explained in a response to one Reddit user: "small bull case scenario for Bitcoin is a 400 billion USD dollar market cap, so 40,000 USD a coin, but I believe it could be much larger. When this will happen, if it happens, I don’t know, but if it happens, it will probably happen much faster than anyone imagines.""

DUMP:

"The twins are in the process of setting up the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, a listed fund to manage their Bitcoin wealth and bring greater legitimacy to the virtual currency. Papers for the initial public offering were filed in July, but the final decision is still pending. Due to regulations, Cameron was unable to discuss the trust in the AMA"

http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/12/15/winklevoss-twin-says-bitcoin-valuation-will-top-40k-plays-down-silk-road-closure/#!p2vds

"In a move that could come to mark a major new era for the virtual currency, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss have filed to float their stash of Bitcoins on a conventional stock exchange. The former Olympic rowers have lodged papers for a $20m initial public offering of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, which holds their Bitcoin wealth, and would be managed by the Winklevoss' investment fund, Math-Based Asset Services. "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/currency/10157710/Winklevoss-twins-20m-plan-to-make-Bitcoin-mainstream.html

Obviously they want the price to be as high as possible, before they dump via this fund. This is a clever tactic, as the dumping via a trust can support the price (wow new trust, look at the adoption) and you can get rid of your coins. If you dump on an exchange it leads to total collapse.

If they are so convinced of this high price, why sell the position. Sounds like a scam to me.

Topic: Winklevoss: Trying to pump before they dump? (Read 7503 times)