Aside from the op issue, doesn't this seem like a deliberate arbitrariness from wolfbet without providing any explanation as to why the deposited amount is suspected, especially since it is a small amount.
assuming they are suspecting him of money laundering, they are not going to provide any explanation on why they suspect him, doing that will basicly be telling what not to do to not get caught.Let's assume he bought USDT from a friend pair-a-pair in a cafe or bar, how will he prove it to the casino?
what if the USDT from the friend is stolen? or scammed? or hacked, or... or... i think you get what i mean.and as far as i know, you will fail any AML check if your coins are bought that way, becasue you will have no proper documentation to prove the source of the coins.
I always expect that the question about the source of the funds is in exceptional cases at the request of the authorities.
note at all, providing the source of funds is standard AML in cryto and outside crypto, especially in light of MiCA and other regulations we will start seeing more and more.Here, did anyone suspect $2300? This would be a red flag against wolfbet if they can't provide valid arguments so that we can understand how things could have gone on there.
it's not about the amount, from what been shared with me, they observed suspicious patterns from a bunch of users including OP, asked for KYC, then source of funds, and now we are here.It is a well-established casino with a good reputation and I am surprised by this compliant that has been stuck for days .
it only been 2 days, and OP only sent what wolfbet asked for yesterday, and he sent the wrong address screenshot. the deposit was from an eth address but he sent a tron address, and a screenshot from bookmaker.eu that show no withdrawal address or tx id.so unless OP is able to provide the source of the USDT, he will fail the AML check. and knowing wolfbet, they will at least refund his deposit and not confiscate it before closing his account.
