Topic: Woodie & BitcoinHunt3r (Read 808 times)
The thread can be closed. Blackjack reported that there are no visible connections between the users.
There is an additional way to verify if they're alts.
This is done by asking the BJ team to verify their accounts by looking at their accounts on the BJ website. Even if they're using a VPN, there are still ways to verify it.
This is done by asking the BJ team to verify their accounts by looking at their accounts on the BJ website. Even if they're using a VPN, there are still ways to verify it.
It will violate privacy of users by revealing the identity or IP of accounts made in the casino to the public. Imagine you are in their situation which someone accusing you that connected to other user while the casino will easily reveal your information in public forum.
Even @theymos doesn’t reveal our IP here to determine all alt account which is easier method to verify account connection and its because of our privacy protection.
I gave that suggestion considering the fact both accounts participated in BlackJack’s contest and have to input their BJ username so BJ has every right to make sure contest is fair.
AFAIK, this is just a sponsored contest by the casino. The one that organized the contest is a forum member and just funded by the casino as sponsor. Correct me if I’m wrong but this is not an official contest by the casino itself.
Quote
Edit: I did not mean posting their IP or doxing them on the forum
The problem with this is how can we verify their findings without someone in the forum will verify it. Forum usually needs evidence for the connection and there’s no way to prove it with just Blackjack.fun pure words. I mean I trust blackjack.fun but will the forum allowed that kind of vouch as evidence?
It will still go back to the need to disclose the findings such as IP and other connection to prove this accusation.
Just my 2 cents on this issue.
There is an additional way to verify if they're alts.
This is done by asking the BJ team to verify their accounts by looking at their accounts on the BJ website. Even if they're using a VPN, there are still ways to verify it.
This is done by asking the BJ team to verify their accounts by looking at their accounts on the BJ website. Even if they're using a VPN, there are still ways to verify it.
It will violate privacy of users by revealing the identity or IP of accounts made in the casino to the public. Imagine you are in their situation which someone accusing you that connected to other user while the casino will easily reveal your information in public forum.
Even @theymos doesn’t reveal our IP here to determine all alt account which is easier method to verify account connection and its because of our privacy protection.
I gave that suggestion considering the fact both accounts participated in BlackJack’s contest and have to input their BJ username so BJ has every right to make sure contest is fair.
Edit: I did not mean posting their IP or doxing them on the forum
There is an additional way to verify if they're alts.
This is done by asking the BJ team to verify their accounts by looking at their accounts on the BJ website. Even if they're using a VPN, there are still ways to verify it.
This is done by asking the BJ team to verify their accounts by looking at their accounts on the BJ website. Even if they're using a VPN, there are still ways to verify it.
It will violate privacy of users by revealing the identity or IP of accounts made in the casino to the public. Imagine you are in their situation which someone accusing you that connected to other user while the casino will easily reveal your information in public forum.
Even @theymos doesn’t reveal our IP here to determine all alt account which is easier method to verify account connection and its because of our privacy protection.
Not trying to help or defend OP, but you guys need to read the post again. He never accused the mentioned accounts of cheating; So no need to ask for evidence that you're looking for. I think he only noticed that Woodie and BitcoinHunter have the same username on different platforms. I understand that you guys assume if someone posts here in reputation board you think there's something wrong or someone is cheating but its not. , I do agree to lock this thread since Woodie already mentioned that they're different user.
This makes sense,The reputation board isn’t a place where your always here to be crucified, it’s a place where you can as well add some respect to your name as well as be questioned on certain characters or putting a notice on some behavior out.
That’s why, I can hardly see this for an accusation since, the OP isn’t clearly stating anything just yet but, it’s a bit sketchy when this sort of things pop up.
At least one user has come up to clear the air, if there was any reason to do so or for doubt at all, I can’t say but, these users have been of reputable character as I know them on the forum.
As they have no other similarities I think it could be useless if you accuse them as alter. Moreover, 1 important thing is that an alt account is allowed but any cheating is not. As there is no evidence of alt and especially cheating I think this thread is useless though you have mentioned it is not an accusation.
OP if you don't want to discuss what you started, better lock this thread.
What are you asking for
? This thread was opened specifically to get others to do what the OP assumed was suspicious. As you can see, he "threw a bone" and didn't prove anything, but several people got interested and are looking for evidence of what the OP should have essentially done. There are no problems with alt accounts, and there is a thread for this, but the OP lacks fame, so he makes drama from thread to thread. look at Op's lazy habits
I'm too lazy to make a report. Can someone make report about this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64159544
I think these 2 accounts belong to the same person.
However, I see no reason to flag these accounts as long as they participate in different campaigns and do not abuse football pools and contests.
Here is the in services section where these users haven't gone accepted in the same campaign. Although ninjastic.space won't give precise results since maybe one of the user accepted last week and the other in the next few weeks.However, I see no reason to flag these accounts as long as they participate in different campaigns and do not abuse football pools and contests.
https://ninjastic.space/search?board=52&content=Woodie%20BitcoinHunt3r
While this one, they both participate and maybe even both user wins in a giveaway thread.
https://ninjastic.space/search?board=71&content=Woodie%20BitcoinHunt3r
Now, the question, what is/are the strong evidence linking the two accounts? I haven't dig deeper and i don't think i will...
I'm not accusing Woodie and BitcoinHunt3r of any kind of cheating.
That's what's great about this forum, it doesn't limit and doesn't become a violation for those who have two or more accounts here, as long as they don't violate the campaign rules they are not a special concern for other members and campaign managers, the forum doesn't care about that.I've seen dozens of members here have 1-2 accounts that are still active here, as I said above, it's not a real problem for them.
Example:
1. Rockstarguy
2. Y3shot
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rockstarguy-3361197
Current amount of post: 1643
Earned merit in 120 days : 62
Bech32 btc address: bc1q95azyqq9uenkus6scy8v50kucrg448frxlzjja
[ Archive ]Current amount of post: 1643
Earned merit in 120 days : 62
Bech32 btc address: bc1q95azyqq9uenkus6scy8v50kucrg448frxlzjja
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/y3shot-3374746
Current post count: 1383
Merit EARNED in the last 120 days: 15
Bech32 btc address: bc1q95azyqq9uenkus6scy8v50kucrg448frxlzjja
[ Archive ]Current post count: 1383
Merit EARNED in the last 120 days: 15
Bech32 btc address: bc1q95azyqq9uenkus6scy8v50kucrg448frxlzjja
This proves that @Rockstarguy and @Y3shot are the same person, from the same address used, but he didn't violate or violate any rules here, of course a win for him.
This is the same as the case OP raised. It's not a violation for either of them.
Okay, I read the thread and so far the evidence of wrongdoing is... none?
There is a remote possibility that they are alts, based entirely on speculation without evidence, and if they are alts, they have applied for the same campaigns but we do not know if they would have joined them had they been accepted with the two accounts.
And then there is this which would only be wrongdoing if they were alts.
Speculation, speculation, speculation.
See, I don't think twice when I see evidence but in this case I'm more for leaving a neutral tag on the OP for opening threads with no basis than tagging either account (if nothing else comes up).
There is a remote possibility that they are alts, based entirely on speculation without evidence, and if they are alts, they have applied for the same campaigns but we do not know if they would have joined them had they been accepted with the two accounts.
And then there is this which would only be wrongdoing if they were alts.
Speculation, speculation, speculation.
See, I don't think twice when I see evidence but in this case I'm more for leaving a neutral tag on the OP for opening threads with no basis than tagging either account (if nothing else comes up).
I think these 2 accounts belong to the same person.
Considering you are a privileged user to some of these bookies you can easily get in touch with the platforms support staff...It would be nice if support from either BC game or blackjack.fan was asked if KYC INFO or IP used on those platforms have any geo similarities with other user...and if they did am pretty sure connected accounts would have been locked or something... permission granted to check with them!!!!You might actually help clear my name here .
Edit 12/07/24
However, I see no reason to flag these accounts as long as they participate in different campaigns and do not abuse football pools and contests.
Dude am not Indonesian & why the restrictions as if we are one?? Funny thing OP has too many gaps in how they come on the forum only to cause confusion and you believe them and hadly found on the gambling section...I wouldn't be surprised if someone is trying to take out the competition.Anyway you might as well just say it that am not to play in your pools , am cool with it because that's how I feel I read this...is this because I have won one two many times from these pools or I commented on the 6million BC.Game scam accusation??
Btw, check with these bookies my KYC or IP should check out to prove am a whole different person far from being Indonesian or Filipino as I have been playing there for over 2- 5 or 10 years on some platforms!! Just no doxxing
Code:
Sportsbet.io
FJ
Rollbit
Roobet
BC.game
Shuffle
Blackjack.fun
Cloudbet
Sherbet
Betcoin
Etcetera
Btw Betcoin hosted a poker game recently just last week , and countries of players playing had country showing publicly, if you ask you will get the same geo location!!!
I rest my case.
And btw I have won a collectible item here on the forum and if need be...I can point you to them to ask if names are Indonesian or Filipino...same names on gaming accounts above..
if there is additional evidence such as blockchain transactions, then it will strengthen the accusation that both accounts are operated by the same person.
I always believe that there is no coincidence for people to create very identical usernames even on different platforms. but for now, there is no additional evidence to convict both accounts.
OP if you don't want to discuss what you started, better lock this thread.
I always believe that there is no coincidence for people to create very identical usernames even on different platforms. but for now, there is no additional evidence to convict both accounts.
OP if you don't want to discuss what you started, better lock this thread.
There is an additional way to verify if they're alts.
This is done by asking the BJ team to verify their accounts by looking at their accounts on the BJ website. Even if they're using a VPN, there are still ways to verify it.
However, I see no reason to flag these accounts as long as they participate in different campaigns and do not abuse football pools and contests.
Here we go.Total Goals: 25
BlackJack username: BitcoinHunt3r
BlackJack username: BitcoinHunt3r
Total Goals: 35
BlackJack username: coinhunterZ
BlackJack username: coinhunterZ
- Abuse of multiple accounts will immediately result in your account being red-tagged.
(Archived version)I always believe that there is no coincidence for people to create very identical usernames even on different platforms. but for now, there is no additional evidence to convict both accounts.
OP if you don't want to discuss what you started, better lock this thread.
However, I see no reason to flag these accounts as long as they participate in different campaigns and do not abuse football pools and contests.
Here we go.Total Goals: 25
BlackJack username: BitcoinHunt3r
BlackJack username: BitcoinHunt3r
Total Goals: 35
BlackJack username: coinhunterZ
BlackJack username: coinhunterZ
- Abuse of multiple accounts will immediately result in your account being red-tagged.
(Archived version)
I think these 2 accounts belong to the same person.
However, I see no reason to flag these accounts as long as they participate in different campaigns and do not abuse football pools and contests.
However, I see no reason to flag these accounts as long as they participate in different campaigns and do not abuse football pools and contests.
You do not have any case at hand; matter is closed. I will advise you to lock the thread preferably, since you have no good evidence to back up the account connection claims.
Having the same known name answered outside the forum shouldn't trigger a gunshot like this, in the forum because it will be a missed target
Having the same known name answered outside the forum shouldn't trigger a gunshot like this, in the forum because it will be a missed target
I'm not accusing Woodie and BitcoinHunt3r of any kind of cheating. I just noticed they have the same username on different platforms and character cases. Just a coincidence, right?
If you're not accusing me of anything, then why is this thread dedicated to these members? Why is putting them in the spotlight and the issue is nonsense? When I sign up for a platform with my favorite username already taken, I just put in numbers or capitalize some letters. We have attachments to usernames, and we do not have a copyright to usernames. It's on a first-signup, first-username basis.
You should know that if you are joining many platforms that ask for usernames.
It's not forbidden to have several accounts. As long as they don't abuse a campaign, everything should be okay.
Alt account can be bad for lending and can be an additional reason for defaulting on loans. If you have 10 alt accounts, if you default on one of the loans you can continue with the rest of the accounts, but if your alt accounts are known you will not be able to participate in any campaign unless you pay off your loans. 
Not trying to help or defend OP, but you guys need to read the post again. He never accused the mentioned accounts of cheating; So no need to ask for evidence that you're looking for. I think he only noticed that Woodie and BitcoinHunter have the same username on different platforms. I understand that you guys assume if someone posts here in reputation board you think there's something wrong or someone is cheating but its not. , I do agree to lock this thread since Woodie already mentioned that they're different user.
yes, I read it. come on, we all know the real point of this kind of post. what Op is really throwing is wanting to get another response from users who are willing to do research for him.
Op is not accusing, so what does he want to get?
look at Op's lazy habits
I'm too lazy to make a report. Can someone make report about this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64159544
Only OP can answer the purpose of why he make this thread.
Ps. This will be my last post here.
I understand that you guys assume if someone posts here in reputation board you think there's something wrong or someone is cheating but its not. , I do agree to lock this thread since Woodie already mentioned that they're different user.
If OP doesn't think or suspect that there's anything dodgy going on, what's the point in creating this topic and using an alt account while doing so? After all, having an alt account is not against the forum rules. 
Not trying to help or defend OP, but you guys need to read the post again. He never accused the mentioned accounts of cheating; So no need to ask for evidence that you're looking for. I think he only noticed that Woodie and BitcoinHunter have the same username on different platforms. I understand that you guys assume if someone posts here in reputation board you think there's something wrong or someone is cheating but its not. , I do agree to lock this thread since Woodie already mentioned that they're different user.
yes, I read it. come on, we all know the real point of this kind of post. what Op is really throwing is wanting to get another response from users who are willing to do research for him.
Op is not accusing, so what does he want to get?
look at Op's lazy habits
I'm too lazy to make a report. Can someone make report about this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64159544
hero member
Activity: 462
Merit: 767
Instant cryptocurrency exchange with own reserves!
Not trying to help or defend OP, but you guys need to read the post again. He never accused the mentioned accounts of cheating; So no need to ask for evidence that you're looking for. I think he only noticed that Woodie and BitcoinHunter have the same username on different platforms. I understand that you guys assume if someone posts here in reputation board you think there's something wrong or someone is cheating but its not. , I do agree to lock this thread since Woodie already mentioned that they're different user.
I agree with you.
OP did not accuse them of being alt. Since both of them have same username on different platforms, he finds it interesting but did not dig out. So he posted it here in case anyone want to dig out further. Because we have seen a lot of cases where people posted some clues and then several forum members came with more information about these accounts. Since OP is not accusing of anything like, cheating on any campaigns, it is okay in my opinion.
This does not worth making a post in the reputation board because it is simply a distraction. I will advise the OP to lock this thread because there is no point in it. I do not know when it became an offence to use the same username in different platforms that will warrant it creating a thread in reputation board. It is obvious you don't even know that reputation board is for people with questionable character in the form of violation of forum rules. Several usernames in this forum are similar and there is no issue with that provided there is no violation of the forum rules.
maybe because there is a similarity in the use of the username that makes suspicion. Op is actually not completely wrong. but he did not include strong supporting evidence for his accusation. it was just an assumption or possibility felt by Op from the catch he got.
if Op cannot present additional evidence or if other users add evidence. this accusation thread will not have any meaning. then it would be better to lock it for now and Op can reopen it when he gets stronger evidence.
Not trying to help or defend OP, but you guys need to read the post again. He never accused the mentioned accounts of cheating; So no need to ask for evidence that you're looking for. I think he only noticed that Woodie and BitcoinHunter have the same username on different platforms. I understand that you guys assume if someone posts here in reputation board you think there's something wrong or someone is cheating but its not. , I do agree to lock this thread since Woodie already mentioned that they're different user.
This does not worth making a post in the reputation board because it is simply a distraction. I will advise the OP to lock this thread because there is no point in it. I do not know when it became an offence to use the same username in different platforms that will warrant it creating a thread in reputation board. It is obvious you don't even know that reputation board is for people with questionable character in the form of violation of forum rules. Several usernames in this forum are similar and there is no issue with that provided there is no violation of the forum rules.
maybe because there is a similarity in the use of the username that makes suspicion. Op is actually not completely wrong. but he did not include strong supporting evidence for his accusation. it was just an assumption or possibility felt by Op from the catch he got.
if Op cannot present additional evidence or if other users add evidence. this accusation thread will not have any meaning. then it would be better to lock it for now and Op can reopen it when he gets stronger evidence.
This does not worth making a post in the reputation board because it is simply a distraction. I will advise the OP to lock this thread because there is no point in it. I do not know when it became an offence to use the same username in different platforms that will warrant it creating a thread in reputation board. It is obvious you don't even know that reputation board is for people with questionable character in the form of violation of forum rules. Several usernames in this forum are similar and there is no issue with that provided there is no violation of the forum rules.
Expected this inqury to pop-up sooner or later 
Let's just say for @BitcoinHunt3r the user name is in the username itself and for myself i think username came from bountyhunter which I was involved in some few years back and unfortunately name was taken ofcourse and had to tweak the username for my personal use...and having noticed someone else on the forum used the "coinhunterZ" username... I no longer use it for new signups as a username to avoid further confusion in the future.
And for some reason I thought BitcoinHunt3r used his/hers without the "Z" when I came across the username few years back..but whatever the case we are two different user's!!!
Let's just say for @BitcoinHunt3r the user name is in the username itself and for myself i think username came from bountyhunter which I was involved in some few years back and unfortunately name was taken ofcourse and had to tweak the username for my personal use...and having noticed someone else on the forum used the "coinhunterZ" username... I no longer use it for new signups as a username to avoid further confusion in the future.
And for some reason I thought BitcoinHunt3r used his/hers without the "Z" when I came across the username few years back..but whatever the case we are two different user's!!!
I check that both of them applied in the same campaign few times e.g. Whirlwind, Stake etc, but both of them didn't get accepted. Some people think this is form of cheating because they have intention to participate in the same campaign, although we don't know what will happen if they both get accepted.
It's only cheating when accounts belong to the same user but unfortunately we are totally different people!!However the most important point is whether they both are alt accounts, it's quite hard to find the connection.
One is an Indonesian and other oneis a Filipino. never speak Indonesian.
I don't think we have users that avoid their local communities here , and with all the years I have been on the forum don't you think I would have been making some form of contribution to that community knowing very well the perks it has... otherwise wish I could speak Indonesian or Filipino , but my advice let's not speculate on such...and btw where is the Filipino coming from One is an Indonesian and other one
Apart from the fact that having alts is allowed on the forum, what is forbidden or at least frowned upon is certain behaviours with alts.
It's not forbidden to have several accounts. As long as they don't abuse a campaign, everything should be okay.
I check that both of them applied in the same campaign few times e.g. Whirlwind, Stake etc, but both of them didn't get accepted. Some people think this is form of cheating because they have intention to participate in the same campaign, although we don't know what will happen if they both get accepted.However the most important point is whether they both are alt accounts, it's quite hard to find the connection.
One is an Indonesian and other one
And even if these two accounts belong to the same person, so what?
It's not forbidden to have several accounts. As long as they don't abuse a campaign, everything should be okay.
It's not forbidden to have several accounts. As long as they don't abuse a campaign, everything should be okay.
Well since this is to clear your curiosity about the similar username on both platforms, which here is not an evidence of account connection, you may have to come up with more evidence such as wallets connection and the rest of what have you to pin two accounts together.
Between that, both accounts have not violated any rules, e.g enrolling both accounts in same signature campaign, or bounty with intent to cheat the reward, so for now you may have to lock this thread.
Between that, both accounts have not violated any rules, e.g enrolling both accounts in same signature campaign, or bounty with intent to cheat the reward, so for now you may have to lock this thread.
I'm not accusing Woodie and BitcoinHunt3r of any kind of cheating. I just noticed they have the same username on different platforms and character cases. Just a coincidence, right?
Are there any other similarities between the two accounts? Because I don't see any.
Just sharing a similar name across different platforms is hardly evidence of anything. You need more than that to connect the dots. Many times when I want to use my favorite username on a platform, I find it's already taken, so I have to choose an alternative. It's pretty common, actually. "coinhunterz" is too generic a term to be linked to a single user.
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1565
The first decentralized crypto betting platform
I just noticed they have the same username on different platforms and character cases.
What character cases? If the usernames on those platforms are case sensitive, as they usually are, you have no case here.
Stake Username: coinHunterz
BlackJack username: coinhunterZ
Apart from the fact that having alts is allowed on the forum, what is forbidden or at least frowned upon is certain behaviours with alts.
I'm not accusing Woodie and BitcoinHunt3r of any kind of cheating. I just noticed they have the same username on different platforms and character cases. Just a coincidence, right?
Bitcointalk Username: BitcoinHunt3r
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitcoinhunt3r-515719
Post Count: 5042
Forum Rank: Legendary
Are you able to wear our Signature, Avatar & Personal Text? yes
Stake Username: coinHunterz
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitcoinhunt3r-515719
Post Count: 5042
Forum Rank: Legendary
Are you able to wear our Signature, Avatar & Personal Text? yes
Stake Username: coinHunterz
Total Goals: 35
BlackJack username: coinhunterZ
BlackJack username: coinhunterZ
Jump to: