i vote for
No, because there must be something hidden that allows the owner to run away
and i believe there is always another way to the owner can run away the money every time they want
Indeed, i don't think anybody would go trough the hassle of developing a ponzi script that allows him to NOT run away with the money...
I voted YES.
I think it's a great idea if implemented well, it would be worthwhile for a developer to create it.
Compare it to MultiCryptos who has created many ponzi games here and never ran with the money, but takes 5% fee off the top as his reward. He just lets the game play itself out to the point of collapse and then eventually restarts the game. MultiCryptos could have run with the money many times over, but hasn't (yet), so he's built up trust and a lot of people partake in his ponzi games as a result.
Now if a new admin emerges who hasn't built up a proven track record of trust yet, a script that prevents him from taking all the money before the ponzi reaches the point of collapse would be a great feature IMO. It would definitely help get the momentum going for such a ponzi.
