We have different criterias on evaluating a post whether it is a solid topic or not in mycase It depends on the post itself if it was a topic creation it should be:
1. Unique construction (should be consructive yet easy to understand)
2. Using pictures or other media instead of full text (less boring)
3. Avoiding technical words and deep vocabularies
4. Unique topics yet interestinf
5. Knowledgeable
6. Interesting topic to participate with
If it was a reply to topic:
1. Should be related to topic
2. Giving his/her own opinion or perspective not by adopting to other replies and reconstructing it
3. The post replies should alsobe unique and easy to understand
This is all according to my own idea of what a legit post from a shit poster.
1. Unique construction (should be consructive yet easy to understand)
2. Using pictures or other media instead of full text (less boring)
3. Avoiding technical words and deep vocabularies
4. Unique topics yet interestinf
5. Knowledgeable
6. Interesting topic to participate with
If it was a reply to topic:
1. Should be related to topic
2. Giving his/her own opinion or perspective not by adopting to other replies and reconstructing it
3. The post replies should alsobe unique and easy to understand
This is all according to my own idea of what a legit post from a shit poster.
Thank you for the above info can you please evaluate the below topit.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47335445
