Topic: [WTS?] - ANACS MS 67 Silver Casascius Tenth with Exception (Read 2375 times)

Transaction complete.

Nice coin for a decent price .

Confirmed, atomicsix has purchased this coin.  Escrow has been funded with OgNasty.

I will leave this thread open until atomicsix has received the Super Tenth and escrow has been released.

Just posting this up here for reference, Iglasses just accepted my offer.

Going to escrow with OGnasty, and shipped from LesbianCow.

I have purposely sought out casascius coins with dust transactions in the past.  I was very interested to own coins that had Sochi Olympic spam on them.  I wanted it because it's a piece of history, not just monetary history.  This coin is different though, it has a significant amount of funds on it, but I don't think that hurts the coin and in fact will probably add to its premium over time.  As time goes on, it's going to be harder and harder to acquire coins not attached to your identity.  Sure, there will always be people who know how to get anon coins but most average people won't know and people with large banks accounts won't care about the premium.  This coin could be one that fetches a big price later on and I have no doubt this thing is going to get peeled some day because of it.

See if there was a section for this discussion this thread wouldnt have been hijacked....oh wait sorry back to the cas coin sale.

All,

Thanks to everyone for the comments (even the mean ones).  Add my name to the list of people that would love to see a sub forum for the discussion and sales of physical coins.

Now on to the matter at hand...

I don't see how the overfunding affects the value of the coin, but I do agree that it restricts the potential buyers to those would not mind the additional BTC being locked up in it.  If one wanted to, they could gather up all the addresses of these coins and overfund them with dust for next to nothing and there would be nothing the holders of those coins could to stop it.  Would that destroy the value of those coins?

As it happens I am out of town until 7/8 but I do have one person to PM with before a final decision is made on this coin.
Again, to thanks everyone for the input

ig

I agree also on adding the section, but obviously the powers that be do not. I suppose if we get a section then everyone else will also want a small section and it will get out of control.

I chimed in with my 2 cents towards the cause in your thread as well. I just don't see a reason for them (theymos, mods) not to do it honestly...

If they added a physical crypto subforum in the Goods section I truly think most people wouldn't even notice, unless they were already interested/involved in the physical crypto community on here.

Yeah, I started that a couple weeks ago but didn't keep up with it.  I'll go bump it if you guys want to keep trying.  I think there's enough interest...

Edit:  bumped.  Have at it ladies and gents. 

We've tried that before. Og posted a thread in the Meta section and many of us coin nuts chimed in, but the mods said something to the effect of there wasn't enough demand to justify it...   

Perhaps the Meta thread could get a nice bumping though.    I definitely agree a whole side section for physical BTC and other coins would be great.

I second that motion

I really wish there was a subforum to have conversations about the physical coins   

I think that quote from Nubbins was in response to me talking about valuation of coins (in terms of the price offered times face value, or 2x face value) when comparing one Casascius coin's market price to another Casascious coin's market price. I agree with Nubbins math. However the valuation, the answer that Nubbins math provides, needs to be thought of in terms of 2x, 3x, etc. when compared to a similar coin with a different market price or valuation.

Lesbian Cow, I'm glad you're willing to entertain the side conversations. I think it keeps Casascius coins relevant and new people educated. It also keeps your thread floating on the first page!

Interesting side conversation, thanks!

Nubbins' formula is correct from a collector's point of view, no doubt.

I guess what I am saying is that in my opinion it is the sale price, which is what the market will pay, which determines the relative numismatic value and seller's premium.  The face value is fixed.  

I also could be all wrong and have no idea what I am doing.

Personally, I have a shiny premium, which is why I prefer the silvers...

Cheers!

You don't price the coins you buy/sell in terms of their premium, but rather their absolute value?

Below is how at least one person thinks that coins should be priced:

Hi Quickseller,

Technically, I am not selling the coin, iglasses is.  I just have it in my possession - he will determine whether he wants to keep the coin or sell it to an offer received. 

I have just this year started collecting Casascius, and some other, physical coins.  I am certainly no expert, but I would happily pay 1.85 BTC for a MS67 Silver Tenth (that offer is good to anyone who has one).  Yes, I got this one for what I would consider a good deal at 1.65.  Now that the coin has 1.75 BTC loaded on it I am not sure what the coin is worth but iglasses and I wanted to find out, thus this thread. 

There was a bid via PM at 3 BTC and the highest on thread was 2.4 so I guess the market says it is worth somewhere in that range?

Cheers!

[/quote]
I think my point is somewhat proven by the fact that you are essentially selling the coin for what is essentially the same price you paid, the day (or close to it) that you received the coin. I understand you to be a collector of cas silver coins, somewhat assume that you have a good amount of money, so if the coin really would maintain it's value when it is loaded with additional funds, then I would think that a collector would pay for the coin a second time if their payment was accidentally loaded onto the coin (if the coin would maintain the same premium then the net effect to your finances would be zero, and you would get to keep what is a very rare coin).

I know that if I were to be offered a premium of 1.25 BTC on a MS67 cas tenth, then there is a pretty good chance that I may not even respond to them as I would think they are not serious about buying.
[/quote]

Well the basis for my theory is that unfunded and redeemed coins tend to sell at significant discounts verses what coins that are funded at their face value. I don't think I have seen any sales of redeemed cas coins that received a high grade, however I would hypothesize that the premium for a redeemed coin would be less then an unredeemed coin that received the same grade.

I don't think your 'attack' would work very well, because I think the amount the premium would decline by would be less then the additional amount loaded onto the coin. I am just throwing numbers out there, however a coin that is loaded with an extra 1 BTC might see it's premium decline by .1 BTC, so the net price would be .9 BTC higher. The issue in this case however is that this appears to not have been an intentional 'attack' but was rather a mistake, and you are trying to make good on someone else's mistake.

I think my point is somewhat proven by the fact that you are essentially selling the coin for what is essentially the same price you paid, the day (or close to it) that you received the coin. I understand you to be a collector of cas silver coins, somewhat assume that you have a good amount of money, so if the coin really would maintain it's value when it is loaded with additional funds, then I would think that a collector would pay for the coin a second time if their payment was accidentally loaded onto the coin (if the coin would maintain the same premium then the net effect to your finances would be zero, and you would get to keep what is a very rare coin).

I know that if I were to be offered a premium of 1.25 BTC on a MS67 cas tenth, then there is a pretty good chance that I may not even respond to them as I would think they are not serious about buying.

I do not think it hurts the value, but it does make the coin harder to sell in my opinion. The extra 1.6BTC is pretty much trapped/useless since we never actually redeem the coins.

This is an interresting issue...
Should a Casascius 0.1 BTC contain only the original 0.1 BTC to be a 'pure' coin?
Because if so, if you have bad intentions, a coins can be easily devalued by putting more btc on the public address, which are all public.
IMO it does not matter how many bitcoins are on the coin, it is about the physical amount of coins that were made and the grading.
But still food for though...

Haha, a "douche-nozzle"...that's hilarious, i've never heard that said before. I like it. I agree with you, the market is what sets the value of things and clearly people want this coin and are willing to pay a premium for it! (Maybe I should add BTC1 to my tenth and gain some automatic extra return from it!)

This commentary is all just conversation, it's fun to debate a bit, no? And alternative opinions keep people thinking. Don't be so sensitive. The most important thing is that these coins are relevant and worth talking about.

Hi Possum,

Given bids we have received for the coin, both in this thread and via PM, I humbly suggest you are wrong.

You also come across as a douche-nozzle.

Cheers!

there are a good number of casascius coins that have more then their face value loaded. A good number of them have been subject to spam transactions from various people, often of .0001 BTC or less.

The casascius tenth generally will fetch a premium of 1.9 or so when graded MS67 and loaded with .1 BTC. I would think that the premium would decline as more funds are loaded onto it. The premium would probably be the same if there is one or two spam/dust transactions and would only decline slightly if a small amount of extra funds was loaded onto it.

Lesbian cow was obviously able to get the coin with a smaller premium then what they normally fetch. I am not sure what this coin is worth, probably not  1.75 BTC in my opinion, however it is certainly worth more then it's face value, especially considering that it is a) graded, and b) received a MS67 grade.

Unfortunately the physical coin market is illiquid so it is not always easy to sell coins quickly and if coins are to be sold quickly they will often sell at a discount to what they would normally otherwise sell for.

Did you ever hear of the saying, "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all"? That applies to you. Regardless of what you would pay for it, at a minimum it is worth 1.65 BTC  because it has that much loaded on it. Tampered with? No, that implies the hologram is broken, it has just been overfunded - quite substantially. Plenty of people would still bid on this and face value has no relevance on these coins.

The coin has been "tampered" from its original state, like trying to polish patina off an old fiat coin. I'd only offer face value, but that's just me!

Hello Everyone,

The highest offer we received on the Super Tenth is 3.0 btc.  iglasses will decide what he wants to do shortly, but if you want the coin you can make an offer above 3.0

Cheers!

i'll offer 2.4

lol @ super tenth.

I'd be interested but I'd need like 10 days or so (I've been spending too much lately). So don't sell too low if you don't need to.

ill bump up my offer to 2.3BTC

Yea I ID'd the address of the coin in the escrow request desiring to identify the item being sold but I did not also include a payment address.  When the coin was delivered and LC advised OgNasty to release the escrow he did to the only address he had from me, which was the coin not my wallet.  I totally missed the incorrect address in his PM.  There is ZERO fault here on OgNasty or LC...I just missed the address plain and simple and the result is that I now have neither the coin or the BTC that the buyer paid for it..lol

This is what happens when stretch yourself too thin!
I have like 1000 things going on right now both personally and professionally and am going 18+ hours a day to keep up.
headasplode.gif

For those interested in how it happened.  It seemed to be a combination of things.  Basically, no release address was given and the way the escrow request was (mis)interpreted, I believed the address given was the release address.  I then sent my usual, "I will send x amount to x @ x address" which was overlooked by both parties as having the coin's address as the release address.

I think this will sell for 3.3 BTC, it's one of the more rare Casascius coins, it's graded, it probably holds the highest value of all 0.1 BTC coins, and it has a reasonable story behind it for how it happened...

Incorrect copy pasta of the escrow return address I'd think.

Exactly...
I have traded 1 or 2 Casascius coins before and am lost on how that could even happen?

Well yea but I don't think that tells the whole story.

:

Lol oops. Who is selling MS67 tenths for 1.65? And do they have any more? it looks like this is in the OP. I am also curious to know how this happened.

LOL - How did that happen exactly?

Replying to confirm what Lesbian Cow is reporting.

Interesting!

I'll put an offer of 2.1BTC down anyway, just because it is unique.  

Also if this takes off then there's gonna be a ton of people overfunding coins 

Ill go ahead and put 2btc offer for it

Hello Everyone,

So, iglasses and I have an interesting ANACS MS67 Silver Casascius 0.1 BTC coin for sale.

[img=http://s5.postimg.org/xztkuxo43/DSC00320.jpg]

[img=http://s5.postimg.org/ogohf7pzn/DSC00321.jpg]

https://blockchain.info/address/1AgyCV4ucdq6H6i3t6fw41jvp8ya1LvZ1V

As you will see in looking at the address for this coin it is funded with the original 0.1 BTC plus 1.65 BTC.  When I made the purchase of the coin escrow was released to the coin address resulting in the coin now having 1.75 BTC total funding.

To be clear, OgNasty's escrow service has been to the agreement, the error was not on him.  

We are interested in selling the coin and are accepting offers either via PM or on this thread.  Escrow would be with OgNasty no fee and US shipping included.

Buy it now price is 3.3 BTC.  Offers are welcome.

Cheers!