<...>
- The third tab is more interesting, having added the following filter (having created at least 500 posts in a year): Merit per Post (>=500 postDiff)
Note:
- Sorting by merit/post over the last year is a bit of trickster, since many of the top ratios correspond to forum members who have created very few posts over the last year (and can also be influenced by deleted posts). The third tab with the added filter avoids most outlier effects of the kind.
- The third tab is more interesting, having added the following filter (having created at least 500 posts in a year): Merit per Post (>=500 postDiff)
Note:
- Sorting by merit/post over the last year is a bit of trickster, since many of the top ratios correspond to forum members who have created very few posts over the last year (and can also be influenced by deleted posts). The third tab with the added filter avoids most outlier effects of the kind.
Very interesting indeed.
I made this nice graph outlining some users that sits on the "frontier" (plus some quasi-random users of my choice).
The outcome is quite interesting, nothing that wasn't told by raw numbers, but I think visualising is fare more easier.
Very interesting the fact that cutting the post threshold @ 500 left out some really outstanding users with lower post count:
Code:
gmaxwell 206 6.1
theymos 443 5.81
achow101 255 3.96
lovesmayfamilis 346 2.73
Corrosive 318 2.71
tvplus006 390 2.04
SaltySpitoon 254 1.91
aundroid 403 1.89
Plutosky 439 1.37
AakZaki 330 1.33
theymos 443 5.81
achow101 255 3.96
lovesmayfamilis 346 2.73
Corrosive 318 2.71
tvplus006 390 2.04
SaltySpitoon 254 1.91
aundroid 403 1.89
Plutosky 439 1.37
AakZaki 330 1.33
The same graph would be like this:
Quite different I would say.
