This just to finalize this topic.
Because P=9xu+7, if a cubic root exists it can be computed by r1=a^((P+2)/9).
The other two solutions are:
r2=0x3fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbfffff0c . r1
r3=0x1c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c555554e9 . r1
Then it is easy to see that -7 has no cubic root because ((-7)^((P+2)/9))^3 <> -7
Then there is no points with y=0
my 2 cents
Thanks to you all
Topic: x^3+7=0 ? (Read 1239 times)
Shame on me 
There is always the point at infinity (the neutral element of the elliptic curve group). This explains why the total number of points is odd if there is no solution for y=0.
Thanks for these ideas. I will dig in.
As N is odd and all points are duals (x,y) and (x,-y), there is at least one point (x,0), so you must get one.
Quote
I used the code listed here to solve your particular example. It returns None, so probably there isn't an x that solves the equation when y is 0.
As N is odd and all points are duals (x,y) and (x,-y), there is at least one point (x,0), so you must get one.
Quote
But, given y, how can we get x? In particular does someone know a solution to x^3+7 = 0 on the secp256k1 curve?
Well, it's just a finite field, so this should work:Code:
x = modular_cube_root ((y^2 - 7) % p, p)
I used the code listed here to solve your particular example. It returns None, so probably there isn't an x that solves the equation when y is 0.
It shouldn't be too difficult to compute the cubic-root modulo p. There are at most three solution, but I'm not sure if there are always three solutions.
The idea for square root is the following. For every number x^p = x (mod p), hence x^(p+1) = x^2 (mod p), hence x^((p+1)/2) = x (mod p) and x^((p+1)/4) = sqrt(x) (mod p) is one of the two square roots. The other is obtained by negation.
For cubic roots a similar approach should work. If (p+1) is divisible by three then x^(p+1)/6 is a cubic root (I'm too lazy to check if this is the case). There should be a general way to find a cubic root for any prime p.
The idea for square root is the following. For every number x^p = x (mod p), hence x^(p+1) = x^2 (mod p), hence x^((p+1)/2) = x (mod p) and x^((p+1)/4) = sqrt(x) (mod p) is one of the two square roots. The other is obtained by negation.
For cubic roots a similar approach should work. If (p+1) is divisible by three then x^(p+1)/6 is a cubic root (I'm too lazy to check if this is the case). There should be a general way to find a cubic root for any prime p.
I tried yesterday but no, p is not divisible by three
It's divisible by 2, 4, 8, 16 then big numbers (>1M)
It shouldn't be too difficult to compute the cubic-root modulo p. There are at most three solution, but I'm not sure if there are always three solutions.
The idea for square root is the following. For every number x^p = x (mod p), hence x^(p+1) = x^2 (mod p), hence x^((p+1)/2) = x (mod p) and x^((p+1)/4) = sqrt(x) (mod p) is one of the two square roots. The other is obtained by negation.
For cubic roots a similar approach should work. If (p+1) is divisible by three then x^(p+1)/6 is a cubic root (I'm too lazy to check if this is the case). There should be a general way to find a cubic root for any prime p.
The idea for square root is the following. For every number x^p = x (mod p), hence x^(p+1) = x^2 (mod p), hence x^((p+1)/2) = x (mod p) and x^((p+1)/4) = sqrt(x) (mod p) is one of the two square roots. The other is obtained by negation.
For cubic roots a similar approach should work. If (p+1) is divisible by three then x^(p+1)/6 is a cubic root (I'm too lazy to check if this is the case). There should be a general way to find a cubic root for any prime p.
Thanks for your comment mustyoshi
My question is simply, what are the points that lies on the x axis.
Alternatively, how many are there, 1 or 3?
My question is simply, what are the points that lies on the x axis.
Alternatively, how many are there, 1 or 3?
It only becomes trivial to crack the equation when the same "random" number is used in subsequent transactions. Basically the same way they got into Sony's servers, it can, and has been executed on the Blockchain, a few months back some application was using the same random numbers in transactions and people were able to calculate the private key.
Given the x coordinate of a point on the EC curve, it's easy to compute one of the y coordinate.
But, given y, how can we get x? In particular does someone know a solution to x^3+7 = 0 on the secp256k1 curve?
Thanks
But, given y, how can we get x? In particular does someone know a solution to x^3+7 = 0 on the secp256k1 curve?
Thanks
Jump to: