Xal0lex why do you ignore?
The main question: "Can I discuss smart contracts in the Russian section "Кoдepы" (Coders)?"
Topic: Xal0lex why do you ignore? (Read 706 times)
recent example: its friendly environment is composed mainly of informants - rats. They all made a career out of denunciations, and all themes which they have engendered - all about merit!!
Most merited members
Most generous merit members
Most greedy merit members
meritmeritmerit...............etc
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/smerit-2869111
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5080446
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/o-ooae-oce-co-pa-opae-4850385
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/to-200-ooae-oopx-oo-apaoax-smerito-5080658
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ru-200-merit-most-merited-5050922
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5061317
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/to-200-ooae-oepae-oo-caco-5034154
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/200-4523227
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hodl-smerit-5069843
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-108-5055773
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/smerit-5034783
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1072-5042981
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/smerit-4840926
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-4888410
I couldn't take it anymore and tried to criticize them innocently, but of course my light criticism was immediately erased:
Bitcoin Forum
Guest
Deleted Post
« Sent to: Uvajaemy_Kit on: November 24, 2018, 07:23:27 AM »
Reply with quoteReply with quote Remove this messageDelete
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
Quote
зaeбaли вы мepитoдpoчepы, бecпoлeзныe дибилы. Cкoлькo мepитoв ктo пoлyчил, кaкoй ктo paнг oбнoвил, пoздpaвляшки oбнимaшки. Oбcocы eбaныe. Бeгaйтe c линeeчкaми дaльшe, мepяйтe дpyг дpyгy пиcюны. Cмeшныe yибaны.
they are absolutely useless creation on the forum. All of them are engaged exclusively in reports and earnings on the bounty, under the patronage of his local boss xalolex.
This is a real gang, that's who should be expelled from the forum forever.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5072114
and his small salary. All he's capable of. Dumbass
Most merited members
Most generous merit members
Most greedy merit members
meritmeritmerit...............etc
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/smerit-2869111
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5080446
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/o-ooae-oce-co-pa-opae-4850385
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/to-200-ooae-oopx-oo-apaoax-smerito-5080658
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ru-200-merit-most-merited-5050922
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5061317
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/to-200-ooae-oepae-oo-caco-5034154
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/200-4523227
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hodl-smerit-5069843
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-108-5055773
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/smerit-5034783
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1072-5042981
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/smerit-4840926
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-4888410
I couldn't take it anymore and tried to criticize them innocently, but of course my light criticism was immediately erased:
Bitcoin Forum
Guest
Deleted Post
« Sent to: Uvajaemy_Kit on: November 24, 2018, 07:23:27 AM »
Reply with quoteReply with quote Remove this messageDelete
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
Quote
зaeбaли вы мepитoдpoчepы, бecпoлeзныe дибилы. Cкoлькo мepитoв ктo пoлyчил, кaкoй ктo paнг oбнoвил, пoздpaвляшки oбнимaшки. Oбcocы eбaныe. Бeгaйтe c линeeчкaми дaльшe, мepяйтe дpyг дpyгy пиcюны. Cмeшныe yибaны.
they are absolutely useless creation on the forum. All of them are engaged exclusively in reports and earnings on the bounty, under the patronage of his local boss xalolex.
This is a real gang, that's who should be expelled from the forum forever.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5072114
and his small salary. All he's capable of. Dumbass
...
where I discussed about creating specific Smart contract in the Russian segment in the "programmers"(Кoдepы) section .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=66.0
But the moderator Russian section moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no experts in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
...
And those who put merits to Xal0lex , why do you not give me merits now?
where I discussed about creating specific Smart contract in the Russian segment in the "programmers"(Кoдepы) section .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=66.0
But the moderator Russian section moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no experts in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
...
And those who put merits to Xal0lex , why do you not give me merits now?
So, is this discussion about getting the merit for your topic?
And the main question: "Can I discuss smart contracts in the Russian section "Кoдepы" (Coders) or rules do not exist for this forum?"
I want to hear it from Xal0lex, but he is silent.
this is a real shame for the forum. Stupid bureaucrat, incompetent and cowardly. It removes any posts and topics just for fun, confident of its impunity. But the participants of the Russian locale are also to blame, because they perceive it as a boss, leader or king. And he's just the staff. That's our mentality-we suck-up nature
...
where I discussed about creating specific Smart contract in the Russian segment in the "programmers"(Кoдepы) section .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=66.0
But the moderator Russian section moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no experts in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
...
And those who put merits to Xal0lex , why do you not give me merits now?
where I discussed about creating specific Smart contract in the Russian segment in the "programmers"(Кoдepы) section .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=66.0
But the moderator Russian section moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no experts in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
...
And those who put merits to Xal0lex , why do you not give me merits now?
So, is this discussion about getting the merit for your topic?
And the main question: "Can I discuss smart contracts in the Russian section "Кoдepы" (Coders) or rules do not exist for this forum?"
I want to hear it from Xal0lex, but he is silent.
...
where I discussed about creating specific Smart contract in the Russian segment in the "programmers"(Кoдepы) section .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=66.0
But the moderator Russian section moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no experts in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
...
And those who put merits to Xal0lex , why do you not give me merits now?
where I discussed about creating specific Smart contract in the Russian segment in the "programmers"(Кoдepы) section .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=66.0
But the moderator Russian section moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no experts in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
...
And those who put merits to Xal0lex , why do you not give me merits now?
So, is this discussion about getting the merit for your topic?
Xal0lex
Who is right in this dispute, me or you?
Will you avenge me for this?
And those who put merits to Xal0lex , why do you not give me merits now?
Who is right in this dispute, me or you?
Will you avenge me for this?
And those who put merits to Xal0lex , why do you not give me merits now?
If I am not completely mistaken, litecoin started to be discussed in the Development & Technical Discussion section. Some other ideas for new protocols have also started there like DAG. It is necessary to have some differentiation on the technical discussions involving Bitcoin and those about Altcoins. But removing any discussion about something not being used by Bitcoin today, but that could be used in future, is an unnecessary limiter.
Perhaps even to completely rule out this idea as it does with the discussions related to PoW and PoS.
Perhaps even to completely rule out this idea as it does with the discussions related to PoW and PoS.
Well, I deleted this topic.
But it showed how a moderator Russian section may be biased.
You all saw that I was right and fell silent, and before that you put him merits.
And when he realized that I was right, he simply began to ignore. He has nothing to answer.
But it showed how a moderator Russian section may be biased.
You all saw that I was right and fell silent, and before that you put him merits.
And when he realized that I was right, he simply began to ignore. He has nothing to answer.
I am sorry that my advice was misunderstood.
I said you should try to create a new topic.
I didn't said you should change a few words in your topic... And demanding moderator to move your topic is not the right way to solve your problems here.
This a great community and there are rules here. If moderator open exceptions for people, the forum will become a mess.
What's the problem with Altcoin board ? Do not count for signature campaign? Too much spam?
You could create a self moderate topic to keep it without spam.
I said you should try to create a new topic.
I didn't said you should change a few words in your topic... And demanding moderator to move your topic is not the right way to solve your problems here.
This a great community and there are rules here. If moderator open exceptions for people, the forum will become a mess.
What's the problem with Altcoin board ? Do not count for signature campaign? Too much spam?
You could create a self moderate topic to keep it without spam.
Thank you for your answers and attention.
But I don't have to create anything.
I fully comply with rules in Russian section.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48408253
I am sorry that my advice was misunderstood.
I feel OP took the general idea and tried to manipulate your example to achieve their goals. It's just not working out for them, as it was pretty transparent.
and just added information about Bitcoin, although according to the rules in the Russian section, I could not do this
I am sorry that my advice was misunderstood.
That's not how I understood your advice just to be clear. I feel OP took the general idea and tried to manipulate your example to achieve their goals.
It's just not working out for them, as it was pretty transparent.
However, you could try to create a new topic about how to implement those smartcontracts in Bitcoin network? There are implementations of smartcontracts in Bitcoin Network, such as RSK (https://www.rsk.co).
I believe particl is doing something like that as well.
I believe particl is doing something like that as well.
You tweaked your original topic based on some advice here that may have allowed the topic to blur the lines and remain within the board.
I am sorry that my advice was misunderstood.
I said you should try to create a new topic.
I didn't said you should change a few words in your topic... And demanding moderator to move your topic is not the right way to solve your problems here.
This a great community and there are rules here. If moderator open exceptions for people, the forum will become a mess.
What's the problem with Altcoin board ? Do not count for signature campaign? Too much spam?
You could create a self moderate topic to keep it without spam.
Xal0lex (moderator Russian section,who doesn't know)
I recommend to carefully read this topic, which you wrote.
Paздeл для oбcyждeния paзpaбoтки блoкчeйнa и пpoчиx пpoгpaммныx peшeний, cвязaнныx c кpиптoвaлютaми.
Paздeл HE пpeднaзнaчeн для:
- пpeдлoжeний пo paбoтe для пpoгpaммиcтoв (для этoгo ecть в paздeл Paбoтa);
- вcякиx cepвиcoв для пpoгpaммиcтoв (для этoгo ecть paздeл Бизнec);
- вoпpocoв, oбcyждeний и т.п. пo пpoгpaммиpoвaнию в цeлoм, кoтopыe c биткoйнoм и кpиптoвaлютaми нe cвязaны. (Для этoгo ecть paздeл Paзнoe . Этo в лyчшeм cлyчae. Ho, cкopee вceгo, тaкoe, вooбщe, нe для этoгo фopyмa.)
Translation!!!
Section for discussion of the development of blockchain and other software solutions related to the cryptocurrency.
The section is not intended for:
- PROPOSALS FOR WORKS FOR programmers(for this there is a section for work);
- all servers for programmers(for this is the section of Business);
- questions, discussion, etc. on programming in general, that with bitcoin and cryptocurrency are not connected. (For this, it is the section of the "different". This is in the best case. But, most of all, not for this forum.)
And another fact that i'm 100 percent right
In this topic
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--4441550
user taikuri13 asks clarifying question
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39745648
Paздeл для oбcyждeния paзpaбoтки блoкчeйнa и пpoчиx пpoгpaммныx peшeний, cвязaнныx c кpиптoвaлютaми.
Paздeл HE пpeднaзнaчeн для:
- пpeдлoжeний пo paбoтe для пpoгpaммиcтoв (для этoгo ecть в paздeл Paбoтa);
- вcякиx cepвиcoв для пpoгpaммиcтoв (для этoгo ecть paздeл Бизнec);
- вoпpocoв, oбcyждeний и т.п. пo пpoгpaммиpoвaнию в цeлoм, кoтopыe c биткoйнoм и кpиптoвaлютaми нe cвязaны. (Для этoгo ecть paздeл Paзнoe . Этo в лyчшeм cлyчae. Ho, cкopee вceгo, тaкoe, вooбщe, нe для этoгo фopyмa.)
Кaк я пoнимaю - этo чиcтo pyccкaя пpидyмкa, тaк кaк в aнглoвeткe пoдoбнoй тeмы в cпиcкe пpaвил нeт.
Oтcюдa вoпpoc. Этa тeмa нaзывaeтcя "Oпиcaниe...", пpaвилa вeтoк в aнглийcкoм opигинaлe пpaвил нe yкaзывaют пpaвилa для вeтки Кoдepы.
Знaчит нeoбxoдимo этo oпиcaниe coeдинить c пpaвилaми фopyмa (RU)?
Translation
As I understand it, this is a purely Russian rule, since there is no such rule in the English list in the list of rules.
Hence the question. This topic is called "Description ...", the rules of the branches in the English original rules do not indicate the rules for the Coders branch.
So it is necessary to connect this description with the rules of the forum (RU)?
Xal0lex answer
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39835515
Translation
You understand correctly. Well, first of all, I wrote that:
So these rules are only for the Russian section and I fully comply with them.
We all forgive you your mistakes, everybody makes mistakes.
Now you can move the topic back.
Thank you!
I recommend to carefully read this topic, which you wrote.
---------- Кoдepы ----------
Paздeл для oбcyждeния paзpaбoтки блoкчeйнa и пpoчиx пpoгpaммныx peшeний, cвязaнныx c кpиптoвaлютaми.
Paздeл HE пpeднaзнaчeн для:
- пpeдлoжeний пo paбoтe для пpoгpaммиcтoв (для этoгo ecть в paздeл Paбoтa);
- вcякиx cepвиcoв для пpoгpaммиcтoв (для этoгo ecть paздeл Бизнec);
- вoпpocoв, oбcyждeний и т.п. пo пpoгpaммиpoвaнию в цeлoм, кoтopыe c биткoйнoм и кpиптoвaлютaми нe cвязaны. (Для этoгo ecть paздeл Paзнoe . Этo в лyчшeм cлyчae. Ho, cкopee вceгo, тaкoe, вooбщe, нe для этoгo фopyмa.)
Translation!!!
Section for discussion of the development of blockchain and other software solutions related to the cryptocurrency.
The section is not intended for:
- PROPOSALS FOR WORKS FOR programmers(for this there is a section for work);
- all servers for programmers(for this is the section of Business);
- questions, discussion, etc. on programming in general, that with bitcoin and cryptocurrency are not connected. (For this, it is the section of the "different". This is in the best case. But, most of all, not for this forum.)
And another fact that i'm 100 percent right
In this topic
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--4441550
user taikuri13 asks clarifying question
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39745648
---------- Кoдepы ----------
Paздeл для oбcyждeния paзpaбoтки блoкчeйнa и пpoчиx пpoгpaммныx peшeний, cвязaнныx c кpиптoвaлютaми.
Paздeл HE пpeднaзнaчeн для:
- пpeдлoжeний пo paбoтe для пpoгpaммиcтoв (для этoгo ecть в paздeл Paбoтa);
- вcякиx cepвиcoв для пpoгpaммиcтoв (для этoгo ecть paздeл Бизнec);
- вoпpocoв, oбcyждeний и т.п. пo пpoгpaммиpoвaнию в цeлoм, кoтopыe c биткoйнoм и кpиптoвaлютaми нe cвязaны. (Для этoгo ecть paздeл Paзнoe . Этo в лyчшeм cлyчae. Ho, cкopee вceгo, тaкoe, вooбщe, нe для этoгo фopyмa.)
Кaк я пoнимaю - этo чиcтo pyccкaя пpидyмкa, тaк кaк в aнглoвeткe пoдoбнoй тeмы в cпиcкe пpaвил нeт.
Oтcюдa вoпpoc. Этa тeмa нaзывaeтcя "Oпиcaниe...", пpaвилa вeтoк в aнглийcкoм opигинaлe пpaвил нe yкaзывaют пpaвилa для вeтки Кoдepы.
Знaчит нeoбxoдимo этo oпиcaниe coeдинить c пpaвилaми фopyмa (RU)?
Translation
As I understand it, this is a purely Russian rule, since there is no such rule in the English list in the list of rules.
Hence the question. This topic is called "Description ...", the rules of the branches in the English original rules do not indicate the rules for the Coders branch.
So it is necessary to connect this description with the rules of the forum (RU)?
Xal0lex answer
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39835515
Пpaвильнo пoнимaeтe. Hy, вo-пepвыx, я нaпиcaл, чтo:
Quote
Taк кaк в нaшeй вeткe нaмнoгo мeньшe paздeлoв, чeм в aнглoвeткe, в oпиcaнияx yчитывaeтcя этa ocoбeннocть.
Translation
You understand correctly. Well, first of all, I wrote that:
Quote
Since there are far fewer sections in our branch than in an English section, this feature is taken into account in descriptions.
So these rules are only for the Russian section and I fully comply with them.
We all forgive you your mistakes, everybody makes mistakes.
Now you can move the topic back.
Thank you!
My topic does not concern any alternative cryptocurrency at all.
I do not discuss any alternative currency.
Read carefully.
This conflicts with your original post
But the moderator moved my topic only because it does not concern Bitcoin.
And he moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no specialists in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
I think it’s very wrong to transfer this topic just because this topic is more related to ethereum.
And he moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no specialists in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
I think it’s very wrong to transfer this topic just because this topic is more related to ethereum.
You tweaked your original topic based on some advice here that may have allowed the topic to blur the lines and remain within the board. However that is contingent on the moderator agreeing with you, which they do not. So my advice, let it go.
Sitting here trying every little trick to force your will upon the board and moderator will not serve you well. I've provided you with my advice and opinion above should you want to reconsider.
My topic does not concern any alternative cryptocurrency at all.
I do not discuss any alternative currency.
Read carefully.
The possibility of creating smart contracts for specific purposes is discussed and also the topic concerns Bitcoin.
Where in the rules says what percentage of the topic should be about bitcoin?
I do not discuss any alternative currency.
Read carefully.
The possibility of creating smart contracts for specific purposes is discussed and also the topic concerns Bitcoin.
Where in the rules says what percentage of the topic should be about bitcoin?
Don't make an idiot of me. Topic originally contained other text. You edited it.
This is confirmed by your words.
Я cpaзy cкaзaл эфиpoпoдoбныe ceти, ecть yжe мнoжecтвo мoнeт кoпий эфиpa c тaкими жe вoзмoжнocтями. Ha эфиpe тaкoe нe пpoдeлaть, oчeнь пoпyляpeн, нaчинaть нaдo c мeлкoй, нo фyндaмeнтaльнo мoщнoй мoнeты.
Биткoин я пpивeл кaк пpимep c тoчки зpeния пcиxoлoгии и кaк мыcлят люди c oгpoмными cyммaми, тo ecть oни впoлнe бyдyт зaинтepecoвaны в этoм нe тoлькo для pocтa цeны, нo и элeмeнтapнo для бeзoпacнocти.
Биткoин я пpивeл кaк пpимep c тoчки зpeния пcиxoлoгии и кaк мыcлят люди c oгpoмными cyммaми, тo ecть oни впoлнe бyдyт зaинтepecoвaны в этoм нe тoлькo для pocтa цeны, нo и элeмeнтapнo для бeзoпacнocти.
Quote
I immediately said ethereum-like networks, there are already many coins of copies of Ethereum with the same possibilities. On the Ethereum is not to do, is very popular, start with a little, but fundamentally powerful coin.
I cited Bitcoin as an example in terms of psychology and as people think with huge sums, that is, they will be interested in it not only for price growth, but also elementary for safety.
I cited Bitcoin as an example in terms of psychology and as people think with huge sums, that is, they will be interested in it not only for price growth, but also elementary for safety.
My topic does not concern any alternative cryptocurrency at all.
I do not discuss any alternative currency.
Read carefully.
The possibility of creating smart contracts for specific purposes is discussed and also the topic concerns Bitcoin.
Where in the rules says what percentage of the topic should be about bitcoin?
I do not discuss any alternative currency.
Read carefully.
The possibility of creating smart contracts for specific purposes is discussed and also the topic concerns Bitcoin.
Where in the rules says what percentage of the topic should be about bitcoin?
Don't make an idiot of me. Topic originally contained other text. You edited it.
This is confirmed by your words.
Я cpaзy cкaзaл эфиpoпoдoбныe ceти, ecть yжe мнoжecтвo мoнeт кoпий эфиpa c тaкими жe вoзмoжнocтями. Ha эфиpe тaкoe нe пpoдeлaть, oчeнь пoпyляpeн, нaчинaть нaдo c мeлкoй, нo фyндaмeнтaльнo мoщнoй мoнeты.
Биткoин я пpивeл кaк пpимep c тoчки зpeния пcиxoлoгии и кaк мыcлят люди c oгpoмными cyммaми, тo ecть oни впoлнe бyдyт зaинтepecoвaны в этoм нe тoлькo для pocтa цeны, нo и элeмeнтapнo для бeзoпacнocти.
Биткoин я пpивeл кaк пpимep c тoчки зpeния пcиxoлoгии и кaк мыcлят люди c oгpoмными cyммaми, тo ecть oни впoлнe бyдyт зaинтepecoвaны в этoм нe тoлькo для pocтa цeны, нo и элeмeнтapнo для бeзoпacнocти.
Quote
I immediately said ethereum-like networks, there are already many coins of copies of Ethereum with the same possibilities. On the Ethereum is not to do, is very popular, start with a little, but fundamentally powerful coin.
I cited Bitcoin as an example in terms of psychology and as people think with huge sums, that is, they will be interested in it not only for price growth, but also elementary for safety.
I cited Bitcoin as an example in terms of psychology and as people think with huge sums, that is, they will be interested in it not only for price growth, but also elementary for safety.
Ok, I changed the topic and added that we are discussing the use of such smart contracts in Bitcoin using technology RSK (https://www.rsk.co).
Now you can move the topic back.
Thank you!
Now you can move the topic back.
Thank you!
It's funny. A minor mention of bitcoin in your topic does not change anything. The main discussion in your topic is alternative cryptocurrencies.
My topic does not concern any alternative cryptocurrency at all.
I do not discuss any alternative currency.
Read carefully.
The possibility of creating smart contracts for specific purposes is discussed and also the topic concerns Bitcoin.
Where in the rules says what percentage of the topic should be about bitcoin?
Ok, I changed the topic and added that we are discussing the use of such smart contracts in Bitcoin using technology RSK (https://www.rsk.co).
Now you can move the topic back.
Thank you!
Now you can move the topic back.
Thank you!
It's funny. A minor mention of bitcoin in your topic does not change anything. The main discussion in your topic is alternative cryptocurrencies.
Everything concerning the alternative cryptocurrencies should be in the corresponding subsection. In the Russian section, the subsection "Aльтepнaтивныe кpиптoвaлюты" is intended for this purpose.
I recommend to carefully read this topic.
I recommend to carefully read this topic.
Ok, I changed the topic and added that we are discussing the use of such smart contracts in Bitcoin using technology RSK (https://www.rsk.co).
Now you can move the topic back.
Thank you!
Moderator was right by moving your topic to altcoin board. But I understand that you aren't happy about it. There is same issue in English part of the forum - we don't have specific Altcoin boards like ''development and technical discussion'', ''Technical support'', so these kind of topics can be posted only in general Altcoin discussion board. ''Programmers'' board in Russian section is only for stuff about Bitcoin, discussion about smart contracts counts as off-topic here.
Everything concerning the alternative cryptocurrencies should be in the corresponding subsection. In the Russian section, the subsection "Aльтepнaтивныe кpиптoвaлюты" is intended for this purpose.
I recommend to carefully read this topic.
I recommend to carefully read this topic.
Have you discussed it with the moderator?
The problem for you is this is a Bitcoin forum, and for inclusion they have alt boards. All they have done is move it to the appropriate section.
Not much to be done, I'm sure there is an Ethereum based forum out there, you could post your question. You could aslo recreate the topic as a self moderated thread, and bump it daily on that board in an attempt to keep it visible and clean.
Thanks for the reply and advice.The problem for you is this is a Bitcoin forum, and for inclusion they have alt boards. All they have done is move it to the appropriate section.
Not much to be done, I'm sure there is an Ethereum based forum out there, you could post your question. You could aslo recreate the topic as a self moderated thread, and bump it daily on that board in an attempt to keep it visible and clean.
I have not discussed this with local moderator.
I thought maybe global moderators will comment on this. It is foolish to prohibit discussing the creation of smart contracts in the segment where experts gather.
I didn't read your topic, but if it's about ethereum, it has to be moved. You cannot have Altcoin technical discussion in a Bitcoin board. That's not foolish, that's organization.
However, you could try to create a new topic about how to implement those smartcontracts in Bitcoin network? There are implementations of smartcontracts in Bitcoin Network, such as RSK (https://www.rsk.co).
I believe particl is doing something like that as well.
Have you discussed it with the moderator?
The problem for you is this is a Bitcoin forum, and for inclusion they have alt boards. All they have done is move it to the appropriate section.
Not much to be done, I'm sure there is an Ethereum based forum out there, you could post your question. You could aslo recreate the topic as a self moderated thread, and bump it daily on that board in an attempt to keep it visible and clean.
Thanks for the reply and advice.The problem for you is this is a Bitcoin forum, and for inclusion they have alt boards. All they have done is move it to the appropriate section.
Not much to be done, I'm sure there is an Ethereum based forum out there, you could post your question. You could aslo recreate the topic as a self moderated thread, and bump it daily on that board in an attempt to keep it visible and clean.
I have not discussed this with local moderator.
I thought maybe global moderators will comment on this. It is foolish to prohibit discussing the creation of smart contracts in the segment where experts gather.
Have you discussed it with the moderator?
The problem for you is this is a Bitcoin forum, and for inclusion they have alt boards. All they have done is move it to the appropriate section.
Not much to be done, I'm sure there is an Ethereum based forum out there, you could post your question. You could aslo recreate the topic as a self moderated thread, and bump it daily on that board in an attempt to keep it visible and clean.
The problem for you is this is a Bitcoin forum, and for inclusion they have alt boards. All they have done is move it to the appropriate section.
Not much to be done, I'm sure there is an Ethereum based forum out there, you could post your question. You could aslo recreate the topic as a self moderated thread, and bump it daily on that board in an attempt to keep it visible and clean.
I created a topic
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5078416 (deleted)
where I discussed about creating specific Smart contract in the Russian segment in the "programmers"(Кoдepы) section .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=66.0
But the moderator Russian section moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no experts in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
I fully comply with rules in Russian section.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48408253
So the main question: "Can I discuss smart contracts in the Russian section "Кoдepы" (Coders) or rules do not exist for this forum?"
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5078416 (deleted)
where I discussed about creating specific Smart contract in the Russian segment in the "programmers"(Кoдepы) section .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=66.0
But the moderator Russian section moved it from the "programmers" section to the "alternative cryptocurrency" section. But there are no experts in this section and the topics quickly replace each other.
I fully comply with rules in Russian section.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48408253
So the main question: "Can I discuss smart contracts in the Russian section "Кoдepы" (Coders) or rules do not exist for this forum?"
Jump to: