Topic: XTRABYTES Price Discussion. (Read 311 times)
This is an interesting project and coin mcap is still low. Holding some coins for long-term.
You've been shilling this coin for months now, LMAO at saying you've been following it from a distance
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1933714.msg19219372;topicseen#msg19219372
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1982471.msg19741082;topicseen#msg19741082
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1974656.msg19741023;topicseen#msg19741023
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1893009.msg19166454;topicseen#msg19166454
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1709142.msg19000497;topicseen#msg19000497
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1933714.msg19219372;topicseen#msg19219372
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1982471.msg19741082;topicseen#msg19741082
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1974656.msg19741023;topicseen#msg19741023
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1893009.msg19166454;topicseen#msg19166454
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1709142.msg19000497;topicseen#msg19000497
What is your problem? Im interested in xtrabytes cause its a fact its innovative technology. Unlike all the shitcoins you post about. I didnt start those threads?
I got to get your fucking permission to post on coins im focused on?How about you fuck off?
Only time I started a thread before if i remember right was when the price was under 100 sats. Now its rock solid at multiple times that.
You've been shilling this coin for months now, LMAO at saying you've been following it from a distance
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1933714.msg19219372;topicseen#msg19219372
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1982471.msg19741082;topicseen#msg19741082
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1974656.msg19741023;topicseen#msg19741023
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1893009.msg19166454;topicseen#msg19166454
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1709142.msg19000497;topicseen#msg19000497
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1933714.msg19219372;topicseen#msg19219372
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1982471.msg19741082;topicseen#msg19741082
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1974656.msg19741023;topicseen#msg19741023
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1893009.msg19166454;topicseen#msg19166454
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1709142.msg19000497;topicseen#msg19000497
Let me tell you about the price. If this coin remains listed only on Yoshit and Craptopia, expect nothing but crappy graphs like the past two months. Bittrex and Poloniex is where the money is. Apart from that, there is great tech coming, maybe 20 cents by mid-september to octomber.
I've followed this from a distance for a while now. Seems like a good time to buy as the technology IF it's not vapor ware will be a very big thing. Possibly a billion dollar coin so ai wanted to get others plans on trading it's moves.
Recent info on tech shows how interesting this coin could be. Bad English as the developer is deaf and Hugaraian so poor English.
Here is the response from Borz (in his greatly improving English):
Signed off inside the VITALS ?
Yes, and no.
example:
the block height is 1294
112 STaTiC online 400 STaTiC offline.
each 112 STaTiC signed the 1294 block and push these signatures to block signature database.
The block signature database is one independent blockchain tracked database.
All height have lot of related signatures. Not only the online STaTiC.
Of course the 1294 is new block therefore the online STaTiC-s signed and offline STaTiC-s not signed at this moment.
Before a online STaTiC signing 1294 block require all previous block validating.
If the online static was offline the previous day then validate and sign all previous day created blocks.
The final result is one very complex and hardly understandable hash table created. I don't want explain this. Need large and complicated infographics lot of time etc... The final result is just a very large unique number. These unique numbers is the result of consensus. These number will be attached to block. This number is the signature of VITAL. This is not real signature this is a hash of all signatures. I hope to understandable, the VITAL system how to be signing the blocks. The VITAL system "signature" is the big signature consensus. This is not real signature this is big mix of signature hashes. Impossible to change or reproduce without knowing all signers private keys. ( need previous offline STaTiC private keys too ;-) = impossible )
Recent info on tech shows how interesting this coin could be. Bad English as the developer is deaf and Hugaraian so poor English.
Here is the response from Borz (in his greatly improving English):
Signed off inside the VITALS ?
Yes, and no.
example:
the block height is 1294
112 STaTiC online 400 STaTiC offline.
each 112 STaTiC signed the 1294 block and push these signatures to block signature database.
The block signature database is one independent blockchain tracked database.
All height have lot of related signatures. Not only the online STaTiC.
Of course the 1294 is new block therefore the online STaTiC-s signed and offline STaTiC-s not signed at this moment.
Before a online STaTiC signing 1294 block require all previous block validating.
If the online static was offline the previous day then validate and sign all previous day created blocks.
The final result is one very complex and hardly understandable hash table created. I don't want explain this. Need large and complicated infographics lot of time etc... The final result is just a very large unique number. These unique numbers is the result of consensus. These number will be attached to block. This number is the signature of VITAL. This is not real signature this is a hash of all signatures. I hope to understandable, the VITAL system how to be signing the blocks. The VITAL system "signature" is the big signature consensus. This is not real signature this is big mix of signature hashes. Impossible to change or reproduce without knowing all signers private keys. ( need previous offline STaTiC private keys too ;-) = impossible )
Jump to: