Topic: You are not on the indictment. (Read 63 times)

oh look badecker is back with his 'freeman' cult stuff

a 'person' is not a legal entity that is separate from a human
a person is a definition of many things INCLUDING humans

it includes businesses and humans.
it is not a term that separates a human from a business to then consider a name as only a business and not a human

what badecker does not realise is his freeman influencers have died off and lost alot of battles over the last decade.
people have lost their homes and property following the cult crap.

if you want to pretend you are not a human and instead a business, and claim that a court is putting a claim against a business and not a human. well enjoy the result of it not working in your favour, but atleast you will learn.

doing the whole 'your making a claim against a business, but im a human standing here, i wish to face any human accuser crap.
just know that when you demand the human 'government' to stand before you. courts do allow human representatives to stand on behalf of  a business and also a business to stand on behalf of a human.

a 'person' is not limited to one or the other

its why law firms can represent their human clients. and its why human agents can represent the government

badecker is the kind of guy that watches a few silly youtube videos, and without researching or thinking. the cultishly believes he is an expert on a topic without actually doing any check beyond what he has watched.

here is the thing. parents give their child a name. not some government. its the parents that witness the childs birth and the naming. the parents are the witness and proof that a human is known by a name.  a birth certificae is not a contract forming a business. its a witness statement of proof of human birth
if you want to play game pretending you are not this name or you are not known as this name. then a court can simply call in witnesses to the opposite.

the failing of the freeman thing is pretending that human birth and naming and parenting is some silly business act, and not natural event with witnesses/proof. freeman cult pretend humans do not exist and the world is just business contracts.
they have no clue which is why they have failed many times

and before badecker starts quoting lentz, like he did years ago.. no lentz never went to the UK courts queen bench and was never handed a silly complex map that sent him around the court building to the wrong rooms. thats just lentz making things up to pretend things are complicated.

why would he do this.
well things are simple but if he tells people the simple truth no one would pay him. so he makes things look complex and pretend he has this special scheme to beat the system. aslong as they pay him.
and when he loses. he pretends the system is rigged and that the courts are at fault for not acknowledging his schemes rhetoric

Good to have you back Decker. The forum seems flaccid without your commentary. How have you been?

Thanks for pointing out my typo. I'll change it shortly..

Few people who are named on an indictment don't have some kind of knowledge that it might be coming. Either they have received other documents from authorities. Or they know that their group is being watched.Almost nobody gets indicted out of the blue.

The point is that if they have strong feelings that their jig us up, they prepare ahead of time with paperwork that takes them out of indictment way.

The best paperwork that I know of is from the Gemini Group. What it does is to set up one or more private persons with your name. These persons all owe you ridiculous sums of money. You record these persons by document with the secretary of state of your state.

What does this do for you? The State knows that there are these persons. You have signed thee docs as a man, not as the person listed on the doc. Authorities are generally instructed by their attorneys to drop the case before they get into trouble. What trouble? A man or woman who understands law is way more powerful than a person that has your name.

What does that have to do with my indictments? There aren't any that I know of, because I have used this thinking to stop the processes long before they gets to the indictment stage.

Welcome back, we were starting to get worried about you (well, probably not, just seems like a nice thing to say).

Do you happen to have personal experience with the "mindictments"?

When they place your name on the indictment to accuse you in court, it isn't you. There is a legal term called "acceptance." If you formally do not accept, and do not appear like you are accepting, that the name on the indictment is not yours, even though it looks like yours.

https://redress4dummies.wordpress.com//?s=person&search=Go

https://redress4dummies.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/office-of-person1.pdf