You have 3 choices... | Bitcointalksearch.org

coolcoinz

legendary

Activity: 2814

Merit: 1192

Quote from: xen1oph on April 17, 2020, 06:46:04 AM

I understand more and more that it is not logical to live in a big city. Because in this case, you are dependent on work, shops, water supply, electricity, etc.
If a person lives on his own land, then he does not have any problems with this, because he can generally live completely autonomously (if he is well prepared).
No epidemics or economic problems for such a person will be a hindrance.

I came to the same conclusion years ago. I used to live in a downtown apartment with my parents, then alone in my own, on the outskirts, then I moved to a bigger city and lived there for a few years, then to an even bigger city, a huge multicultural capital. I didn't feel well in any of these places. Finally, I've decided to move to a small country town, got my own land and a house. I can tell you that nothing compares to living here, far from any noises, smells and stuff. People who live in the city can't imagine how it's like when you don't hear a police sirens and car engines for days straight and don't have to talk to anyone at all.

Subbir

full member

Activity: 798

Merit: 104

🎄 Allah is The Best Planner 🥀

I accept as true with you that this lockdown is putting us during a much worse situation there's a scarcity of food immediately and after a short time not just the youngsters we'll all starve to death if there's no work to try to to. To me the three tie looks tons harder we'd like to urge out of labor so as to survive during this way the govt doesn't have the facility to regulate the virus.

madnessteat

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 2073

As difficult as it may be for all of us during this "pandemic", we need to keep production chains intact, as even their temporary disconnection can lead to very serious economic consequences.

P.S. If we stop production today, perhaps tomorrow we will have nothing to feed our children.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Sadlife on April 17, 2020, 07:26:54 AM

I have a fourth option and that is work from home then buy the farmers rice and contribute to the economy. The world is change, it's not the same as the 19th century that you can only obtain money to physical labor.
There are bunch of opportunities in the internet especially to those who has pc and internet. There's no need to pick any of the options to die and starve to death.

When the farmers sit at home and work the Internet, where will the food come from?

Why would farmers sit at home and work the Internet? Because the trucking institutions are under shutdown, even if it hasn't gotten to that point, yet.

But if the military takes over shipping food, the money system will collapse, and even the military won't work without getting paid.

BTW, money isn't the real pay. What good is money if you can't buy what you want with it? Or if you can't even buy food?

There is a lot of stuff to think about in this whole CV thing, including the parts of it that are a blown-up hoax. Check the interviews at The Highwire to see what is real and what isn't - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq6oOuhSx7ESreh6m9LGy6Q/videos.

Cool

madnessteat

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 2073

I was forced to act on the second option.

So far no emergency situation has been declared in Russia, and restrictions on movement are only recommendatory in nature. Many people do not have any savings, so they just have to work so that they do not starve to death.

Vaculin

hero member

Activity: 2940

Merit: 613

Winding down.

I'd choose number 1, I have to stay under lock down if that is the order of the government, when they implement that law, they also have the responsibility to feed the people, so I don't think we will die in starvation here.

Sadlife

sr. member

Activity: 1400

Merit: 269

I have a fourth option and that is work from home then buy the farmers rice and contribute to the economy. The world is change, it's not the same as the 19th century that you can only obtain money to physical labor.
There are bunch of opportunities in the internet especially to those who has pc and internet. There's no need to pick any of the options to die and starve to death.

xen1oph

member

Activity: 253

Merit: 11

I understand more and more that it is not logical to live in a big city. Because in this case, you are dependent on work, shops, water supply, electricity, etc.
If a person lives on his own land, then he does not have any problems with this, because he can generally live completely autonomously (if he is well prepared).
No epidemics or economic problems for such a person will be a hindrance.

ethereumhunter

hero member

Activity: 2912

Merit: 541

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Or...

Choice 4.

I still stay at homes, but I can go out to buy my daily needs just in case I'm running out of the materials to make some food, drink, or vitamins. And I can work from homes while lockdown status in my country Grin

That would better if I can do that because I can see what is happening in out there while I keep trying to keep healthy too.

But Choice 3 is better than number 1 and 2.

Saisher

full member

Activity: 2324

Merit: 175

Quote from: BADecker on April 14, 2020, 01:43:25 PM

Choice 1.

Stay in the lockdown, thereby destroying your economy, and die of starvation. The farmers are dumping food they can't get to market right now.

Choice 2.

Get out of the lockdown and go back to work -
just like all the Walmart, Target, and grocery chains employees are doing without much illness -
and take the chance of dying, but not the sure death of #1.

Choice 3.

Sit around in lockdown a little while longer with the hope that somebody will make you feel comfortable about their cure they developed. But don't wait too long. The economy is at a standstill right now, that may not ever be able to be reversed, even if the whole pandemic simply disappeared today.

Cool

I hope you can add a better option even if that option is just to good to be true I think I'll go for option number 3 but all the option is not really good we really need too find a better alternative and the better alternative is only finding a vaccine not even flattening the curve can help.

Broly46

full member

Activity: 1554

Merit: 116

0xe25ce19226C3CE65204570dB8D6c6DB1E9Df74AC

Nope, I’m gonna spam on twitter and wait for someone to suddenly show up and rescue your life, it all start by posting photo, and lure the willing person to come to you.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5240655.0

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: franky1 on April 15, 2020, 05:21:34 AM

Quote from: BADecker on April 15, 2020, 12:58:01 AM

Catch the last couple minutes of this 6-minute video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yvhmf38vOg.

i did watch the last couple minutes of him blowing steam up his ass of how he has been looking..
i also watched the first 4 minutes to know what he was looking at

yes the numbers were way higher BEFORE isolation was even a model. before isolation was even implemented. where the numbers were based on no intervention.

then literally the day the isolations were implemented they done a model to include the effect isolation would have on the numbers. and guess what the result would show less lives lost..
why. because self isolation works.

but the silly fool then uses the isolation model as a reason to say its no big deal..
obviously he doesnt understand what the context of the differing studies are

and its even funnier how in one topic you say its real and in another you say its a hoax..
even you cant even be bothered to do any research which makes your comment void of any substance

atleast do some proper research next time. and stop just trying to click bait people to get the guy more views

Now don't get the big head. Just because you are a human being, and due recognition as such, doesn't mean you know how to evaluate things properly.

Cool

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4424

Merit: 4794

Quote from: BADecker on April 15, 2020, 12:58:01 AM

Catch the last couple minutes of this 6-minute video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yvhmf38vOg.

i did watch the last couple minutes of him blowing steam up his ass of how he has been looking..
i also watched the first 4 minutes to know what he was looking at

yes the numbers were way higher BEFORE isolation was even a model. before isolation was even implemented. where the numbers were based on no intervention.

then literally the day the isolations were implemented they done a model to include the effect isolation would have on the numbers. and guess what the result would show less lives lost..
why. because self isolation works.

but the silly fool then uses the isolation model as a reason to say its no big deal..
obviously he doesnt understand what the context of the differing studies are

and its even funnier how in one topic you say its real and in another you say its a hoax..
even you cant even be bothered to do any research which makes your comment void of any substance

atleast do some proper research next time. and stop just trying to click bait people to get the guy more views

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Catch the last couple minutes of this 6-minute video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yvhmf38vOg.

And go here - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq6oOuhSx7ESreh6m9LGy6Q/videos - to find out why this whold Coronavirus/Covid-19 is a big fat hoax. Then revise your choice.

Cool

lepbagong

full member

Activity: 2268

Merit: 121

Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI

Countries affected by epedemic corona have different solutions because it depends on the range of the region.
with lockdown, the government must provide access to the necessities of life can still be distributed with strict escort and help for workers who do not have wages so that living needs are met. then of course there will be no problems and stay at home can be run well.

if still everything is still working even though the distance between people is run, it will not guarantee that the epedemic corona will stop immediately. because each person's character is very different, there is one who can truly understand but not a few who ignore.

with acts of silence at home it is clear that the country's economy will be disrupted because of the need for bailout funds which should be used for others must be used first for those who remain at home without pay must be assisted. not yet have to buy and prepare the much needed medical equipment. but if an epedemic corona can be terminated quickly then the economy will be able to rise, but if it drags on it cannot be predicted anymore.

jossiel

hero member

Activity: 3150

Merit: 636

DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

As if I have a choice to go outside and start working back again. Certain industries were allowed and exempted to the lockdowns so they can continue providing services that the most affected needed.

The choice 1.

In what country that do this? in most times like this, it's more important to cater those foods coming from the farmers and can be part of the aid that the government is sending to the affected citizens.

Adriane14

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

Revolution of Power

Choice 4. I stay inside my room trying to thinker the situation joining a Global COVID-19 HACKATHON on how to tackle the problem since we are not lazy. At same time preaching cryptocurrency to the youth while they are locked inside their home doing nothing so I think this is 2 birds one stone mission for me

Mad7Scientist

sr. member

Activity: 373

Merit: 262

In countries like the USA and South Africa, choose #1 because it's a scam, nothing more than a bad flu year if that. The same probably applies to Canada, Mexico, India, and Japan too.

If you're in an affected country like Iran, Italy, Ecuador, Peru, and maybe China then just do some of #2. Keep the old people safe and let the people who just have a 3 day incubation period and a mild cold go out and continue on.

KingScorpio

sr. member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 325

Quote from: BADecker on April 14, 2020, 01:43:25 PM

Choice 1.

Stay in the lockdown, thereby destroying your economy, and die of starvation. The farmers are dumping food they can't get to market right now.

Cool

not true, only in loser countries the essential food and production chains collapse, in winner countries the lockdown/corona revitalises the society

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Moonshiners are making a killing. Cheesy

andulolika

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 1047

You mean you people not do beer runs?

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Choice 1.

Stay in the lockdown, thereby destroying your economy, and die of starvation. The farmers are dumping food they can't get to market right now.

Choice 2.

Get out of the lockdown and go back to work -
just like all the Walmart, Target, and grocery chains employees are doing without much illness -
and take the chance of dying, but not the sure death of #1.

Choice 3.

Sit around in lockdown a little while longer with the hope that somebody will make you feel comfortable about their cure they developed. But don't wait too long. The economy is at a standstill right now, that may not ever be able to be reversed, even if the whole pandemic simply disappeared today.

Cool

Topic: You have 3 choices... (Read 292 times)