Those are exports not overall GDP growth.
China has surpassed the projected growth, see the article in FT..
Question. What makes FT data is accurate and Zerohedge's data inaccurate? How would you recognize valid data from invalid data?
Here's another source which contradicts the FT's claims on china's imports.
There is no inaccurate or accurate data.
The article in zerohedge talks about imports and exports.
Then you said:
That data (scrubbed from search results? It should be listed but is not...) verifies china's imports shifting the trade deficit in favor of the united states. A lot of people aren't aware search engine results are heavily censored and manipulated. Wikipedia content many "fact check" websites and many official looking and sounding websites function solely as misinformation platforms, publishing propaganda. Most don't even notice.
Common, don't start with the conspiracy theories. Just don't.
If you're going to believe zerohedge who for 10 years have facts and proofs that the next crisis will happen tomorrow but you won't believe data from other sources, then there is no point arguing.
Many university professors and "academics" demonize zerohedge simply due to its independent slant and due to it historically being one of the few financial websites to post accurate and objective news. Those days are gone for the most part unfortunately however the negative stigma remains.
Zerohedge was nothing more than a piece of....whatever shouting doom doom doom!!!
How many times have they predicted crashes?
The Deutsche Bank derivatives saga?
2013 At $72.8 Trillion, Presenting The Bank With The Biggest Derivative
2014 The Elephant In The Room: Deutsche Bank's $75 Trillion In
2016 Deutsche Bank Tells Investors Not To Worry About Its €46 Trillion In Derivatives
....
later on Investigating Deutsche Bank’s €21 Trillion
This is why I don't trust one thing coming from there.
It's a den for conspiracy theorists , for them banks are pure evil, the government is evil and most important everyone else is to blame for them not leaving in paradise, the illuminate, the Rothschildd , the reptilians are holding them captive in their parent's basements.
Imports went up by 20%?
According to the "Financial Times", china's imports grew 4.5% year-on-year.
I think we agree: the FT's data there can't possibly be correct.
Now, this is entirely your fault for not paying attention.
From your source....zh:
Perhaps in an effort to show there is no trade war, January exports to U.S. rose 7.5%, but 'friendly' imports surged 20.5% on the year.
The data from ft is for December:
China’s exports rose more than expected in December, but import growth slowed dramatically, helping to drive up the country’s trade surplus.Imports meanwhile grew far less than anticipated, with a year-on-year rise of just 4.5 per cent undershooting expectations of a 13 per cent climb and down substantially from the prior month’s pace of 17.7 per cent.