Regarding Adrenochrome, searching on it gives all kinds of contradicting information. However, there are a bunch of different websites that start out with the words "Fact Check:" in the searches. And it seems that the wording in all these "Fact Check" sites is very similar, and speaks in the direction that Adrenochrome stories are hoaxes and fake.
The point is that when you get a bunch of sites that use the same starting format - Fact Check: - and say the same thing basically, that there is a promoter behind them all who has an agenda. So, it makes sense to fact-chect these "Fact Check:" sites to see if they are really stating factual things, or if they are simply agenda oriented.
Often our personal opinion about something is driven by what we want to believe, rather than the truth.
![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
EDIT: In addition, when we voice complaints about a commenter who simply brings info to light, and claim that the commenter is 'bad' for doing this, or that the commenter necessarily believes what is written in the info he shows, the info must be personally affecting the mind of the complainants. Perhaps the complainants are against the idea of hearing about news... because they have something to hide?