It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Codex32 Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | andytoshi | August 11, 2023, 02:53:35 PM | ||
How to build a virtual blockchain on top of a Bitcoin blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
Have you heard of sidechains?
|
n/a | andytoshi | November 22, 2020, 03:58:02 PM | ||
How is a public key calculated from a private key using ecc? Development & Technical Discussion
Not to detract from the main point, but if you were implementing this multiplica…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 02, 2018, 09:03:25 AM | ||
Open Timestamps integration in to Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
There are OTS libraries for Python, Java, Javascript and Rust. See https://opent…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 01, 2018, 02:24:28 PM | ||
Anonymous Atomic Swaps Using Homomorphic Hashing Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteIt is not possible to do a cross-chain atomic swap with only two transactio…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 01, 2018, 08:39:06 PM | ||
Anonymous Atomic Swaps Using Homomorphic Hashing Development & Technical Discussion
You can do adaptor-signature based atomic swaps in Bitcoin without Schnorr; see…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 01, 2018, 10:13:52 AM | ||
FRAGMENTED BACKUPS VULNERABILITY!! IF YOU USE THEM, READ THIS!! Armory
There are two things should be random in SSS. The coefficients of the polynomia…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 25, 2017, 11:53:00 AM | ||
I have a cryptocurrency idea, where do I get started? Altcoin Discussion
What is your idea? There is a good chance you can just build it on top of Bitcoi…
|
n/a | andytoshi | May 31, 2017, 09:10:37 AM | ||
When can Mimblewimble be implemented? Development & Technical Discussion
So.... it looks like finally MimbleWimble will move away from Bitcoin and may…
|
n/a | andytoshi | May 26, 2017, 10:13:24 AM | ||
implicit cost of pegged sidechains Development & Technical Discussion
...every coin on Alpha is 100% backed by a locked coin on testnet, and using the…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 26, 2016, 03:09:02 PM | ||
implicit cost of pegged sidechains Development & Technical Discussion
When the government of Argentina says they're going to peg the peso to the US do…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 26, 2016, 11:33:01 AM | ||
Mimblewimble Paper Proposes ‘Near Complete’ Bitcoin Anonymity Bitcoin Discussion
What kind of blockchain analysis could one reasonably expect with this scheme? I…
|
n/a | andytoshi | August 21, 2016, 05:05:35 PM | ||
Mimblewimble Paper Proposes ‘Near Complete’ Bitcoin Anonymity Bitcoin Discussion
andytoshi,the "paper" actually saysQuoteThen, tovalidate the entire chain, users…
|
n/a | andytoshi | August 07, 2016, 02:25:29 PM | ||
Mimblewimble Paper Proposes ‘Near Complete’ Bitcoin Anonymity Bitcoin Discussion
I value legit anonymity for many reasons.... but coming on the heels of a major…
|
n/a | andytoshi | August 07, 2016, 11:12:06 AM | ||
When can Mimblewimble be implemented? Development & Technical Discussion
Because MimbleWimble doesn't support Bitcoin script, it supports far less functi…
|
n/a | andytoshi | August 07, 2016, 10:52:39 AM | ||
For the super paranoid: How do I get the public key from a private key by hand? Development & Technical Discussion
It's faster in wNAF and using Jacobian coordinates rather than Cartesian. Still…
|
n/a | andytoshi | July 18, 2016, 09:55:04 AM | ||
For the super paranoid: How do I get the public key from a private key by hand? Development & Technical Discussion
How much precomputation are you willing to do? Is it OK to use a computer for th…
|
n/a | andytoshi | July 15, 2016, 08:19:43 AM | ||
Smart contracts in bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
To answer the OP's question, s/he could use something like a assurance contract,…
|
n/a | andytoshi | July 14, 2016, 10:38:14 AM | ||
attaching messages on transactions and retrieving them from the blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
You can only have a *single* OP_RETURN per tx - so there is no issue with multip…
|
n/a | andytoshi | July 14, 2016, 10:28:43 AM | ||
attaching messages on transactions and retrieving them from the blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
Please do not put arbitrary data in OP_RETURN outputs. This is antisocial becaus…
|
n/a | andytoshi | July 14, 2016, 06:48:44 AM | ||
Secret sharing Development & Technical Discussion
To add to Danny's "here's how to do it properly", the problem that OP mentioned…
|
n/a | andytoshi | July 13, 2016, 06:23:42 AM | ||
reasoning behind frequent new address generation Bitcoin Discussion
HI ggbitcoin,There are a couple "security" reasons this is worth doing:When you…
|
n/a | andytoshi | July 13, 2016, 06:20:31 AM | ||
x , y coordination division Development & Technical Discussion
Hi sss555,Sorry I missed your message about this the other day about this.From r…
|
n/a | andytoshi | August 06, 2015, 10:55:06 AM | ||
how to get X value from Y Development & Technical Discussion
Hi sss555,If you can, installing sage and using that rather than Python will mak…
|
n/a | andytoshi | July 25, 2015, 10:33:40 PM | ||
[Crypto] Compact Confidential Transactions for Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
I'm reasonably confident that the paper as written on July 3 works. I'm a bit un…
|
n/a | andytoshi | July 07, 2015, 01:40:44 PM | ||
[Crypto] Sumcoin Whitepaper - Compact Confidential Transactions Development & Technical Discussion
How does it compare to Gregory Maxwell "Confidential Transactions" ?If it is cor…
|
n/a | andytoshi | June 11, 2015, 04:29:11 PM | ||
[Crypto] Borromean ringsig: Efficiently proving knowledge for monotone functions Development & Technical Discussion
PS: using a edge-to-vertex dual graph where signatures are represented as nodes…
|
n/a | andytoshi | June 04, 2015, 01:10:07 PM | ||
Encoding a transaction in a point of the curve y^2=x^3+7 and Bitcoin Core Development & Technical Discussion
Hi arulbero,I like this question. The short answer is that messages are not enco…
|
n/a | andytoshi | May 07, 2015, 01:16:55 PM | ||
Coinjoin improvement..? Development & Technical Discussion
Cryddit, if the beers were all labeled with unique addresses this game would not…
|
n/a | andytoshi | April 02, 2015, 05:15:06 PM | ||
Why block time matters. Altcoin Discussion
Hi hamiltino,There are a couple reasons that the average block interval can't be…
|
n/a | andytoshi | April 01, 2015, 03:37:38 PM | ||
Cross Chain Pegging? Development & Technical Discussion
Are you aware of the sidechains whitepaper? The problems you will encounter are…
|
n/a | andytoshi | April 01, 2015, 01:08:39 PM | ||
XMR vs DRK Altcoin Discussion
it's more like math hasn't got to the stage where it can describe complex system…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 30, 2015, 02:16:20 PM | ||
XMR vs DRK Altcoin Discussion
Can you (or Tok) point to a part of a cryptocurrency which isn't cryptography?th…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 29, 2015, 08:37:32 PM | ||
XMR vs DRK Altcoin Discussion
Tok said cryptography 'wasn't a significant part' of cryptocurrencies. He didn'…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 29, 2015, 01:35:48 PM | ||
Coinjoin improvement..? Development & Technical Discussion
In the big splashy CoinJoin post I simplified it down a model where there was so…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 29, 2015, 12:12:37 PM | ||
DeckWallet: looking for security feedback and comments Development & Technical Discussion
Not only losing them, but shuffling them (or causing them to be shuffled, e.g. b…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 25, 2015, 10:50:27 PM | ||
Transaction type Development & Technical Discussion
Note that the notion of sender addresses doesn't correspond to anything in the p…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 25, 2015, 10:45:34 PM | ||
DeckWallet: looking for security feedback and comments Development & Technical Discussion
Any comments regarding security? Do you see any problems savings big amounts of…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 25, 2015, 10:42:10 PM | ||
Is it possable to create proof of stake sidechains? Development & Technical Discussion
As far as PoS being unable to form a consensus well that is a larger issue about…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 23, 2015, 08:52:44 AM | ||
Is it possable to create proof of stake sidechains? Development & Technical Discussion
For a 2-way pegged sidechain to work, the parent chain must be able to understan…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 20, 2015, 04:03:43 PM | ||
Quick elliptic curve security question Development & Technical Discussion
Hey Peter,k1 is indeed hidden. You can argue this by reduction ... suppose you h…
|
n/a | andytoshi | March 08, 2015, 05:04:31 PM | ||
Conceptual Coding Question about the Bitcoin Client Development & Technical Discussion
Hi dain-001,Have you read A Treatise on Altcoins? How familiar with cryptography…
|
n/a | andytoshi | February 15, 2015, 09:53:45 PM | ||
An odd looking tx. Development & Technical Discussion
Hi CuriousCarl,Bitcoin transactions are actually chained together in a more gene…
|
n/a | andytoshi | February 03, 2015, 04:54:33 PM | ||
How to Create a Bitcoin Address from a Coin Flip Development & Technical Discussion
Can someone please tell me where are the 5-9 of this happening in the OP ?These…
|
n/a | andytoshi | February 03, 2015, 04:42:53 PM | ||
How to Create a Bitcoin Address from a Coin Flip Development & Technical Discussion
Please please please do not do this. The cryptosystem which Bitcoin keys and add…
|
n/a | andytoshi | February 03, 2015, 04:42:08 PM | ||
Is bitcoin v0.10's new libsecp256k1 safe & without mathematical backdoors? Development & Technical Discussion
It's just a matter of testing and really making sure it's got no mathematical bu…
|
n/a | andytoshi | January 31, 2015, 10:50:26 PM | ||
❢❢❢ The value proposition of each coin: BTC, DOGE, LTC, DRK, PPC, XRP, NXT, etc. Altcoin Discussion
I think it's on Andrew Poelstra to prove his claims.Hi ilodin,While this would b…
|
n/a | andytoshi | January 29, 2015, 08:47:39 AM | ||
Is bitcoin v0.10's new libsecp256k1 safe & without mathematical backdoors? Development & Technical Discussion
I've been looking at the code, and theres quite a few magic numbers in there Can…
|
n/a | andytoshi | January 28, 2015, 09:22:04 AM | ||
Is bitcoin v0.10's new libsecp256k1 safe & without mathematical backdoors? Development & Technical Discussion
Hi colinistheman,This is a good question. I should start off by mentioning that…
|
n/a | andytoshi | January 27, 2015, 09:07:22 AM | ||
Proof of Stake with Entropy loss as signature cost Altcoin Discussion
Each address that participates in signing will have a deterministic secret S (it…
|
n/a | andytoshi | November 06, 2014, 09:36:47 AM | ||
Pegged Sidechains [PDF Whitepaper] Development & Technical Discussion
laurentmt: definitely. This is sorta "allowed by default" by a sidechain design…
|
n/a | andytoshi | November 04, 2014, 08:32:37 AM | ||
A(nother) downside to Proof-of-Stake? Development & Technical Discussion
Quoteandytoshi, what do you think about saving PoS by bouncing checkpoints/block…
|
n/a | andytoshi | November 01, 2014, 02:05:10 PM | ||
What are checkpoints in bitcoin code? Development & Technical Discussion
Exactly the point. Node's already trust that blocks are valid because they have…
|
n/a | andytoshi | November 01, 2014, 01:59:18 PM | ||
What are checkpoints in bitcoin code? Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteOld checkpoints distort the selection of the chain, but there's no reason n…
|
n/a | andytoshi | November 01, 2014, 11:11:47 AM | ||
A(nother) downside to Proof-of-Stake? Development & Technical Discussion
I still don't see how a nothing at stake attack could succeed.Maybe if you read…
|
n/a | andytoshi | November 01, 2014, 11:05:56 AM | ||
Message Encryption with bitcoin address. Development & Technical Discussion
In this situation the sender would have by default had to already reveal (to the…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 31, 2014, 01:46:06 PM | ||
A(nother) downside to Proof-of-Stake? Development & Technical Discussion
Oh, my bad, I thought you had linked to an earlier one.The one you posted was hi…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 30, 2014, 09:29:43 PM | ||
A(nother) downside to Proof-of-Stake? Development & Technical Discussion
I am curious to hear other's opinions on Vitalik's PoS proposals that attempt to…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 30, 2014, 08:52:50 PM | ||
AttackerSuccessProbability(0.3,1) = 0.627749 Development & Technical Discussion
Either this interpretation is incorrect or something in the Satoshi formulae is…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 30, 2014, 08:40:10 PM | ||
multisig using Curve25519 Development & Technical Discussion
Oops! || is concatenation -- you hash the message, then hash R with the same sha…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 13, 2014, 08:01:49 PM | ||
multisig using Curve25519 Development & Technical Discussion
Hi James,m is the message to be signed . The signature is the pair (r, s).Andrew
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 13, 2014, 07:32:26 PM | ||
multisig using Curve25519 Development & Technical Discussion
Hi James,It seems like are a few misunderstandings here. Let me start with some…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 13, 2014, 02:24:07 PM | ||
A -failed- solution to a collusion flaw in Deterministic Wallets Development & Technical Discussion
You can mitigate this somewhat by use of hardened keys (which cannot be derived…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 11, 2014, 11:23:55 AM | ||
checkpoints.cpp and timestamps Development & Technical Discussion
Checkpoints are really not necessary. They prevent a DoS attack where on first b…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 11, 2014, 11:16:12 AM | ||
[Q] How/where TXID is created Bitcoin Technical Support
He could generate a raw transaction and sign it multiple times (as this yields a…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 10, 2014, 07:54:44 AM | ||
Looking into forking the core wallet to use parallel computing to verify blocks Development & Technical Discussion
Interested in this also. Maybe begin looking at how parallelisable sipa's libsec…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 09:10:16 PM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion
You don't need to verify the integrity of nodeC.left.hash or nodeC.right.hash.
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 02:12:05 PM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 12:33:06 PM | ||
A Scalability Roadmap Development & Technical Discussion
Ordinary people aren't supposed to run full nodes anyway This is absurd and fal…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 12:08:34 PM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion
The prover provides nodeC's child hashes. There is no need to verify that they a…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 12:07:54 PM | ||
Looking into forking the core wallet to use parallel computing to verify blocks Development & Technical Discussion
It's not so much that they are far away from each other (though they are), it's…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 12:07:03 PM | ||
Looking into forking the core wallet to use parallel computing to verify blocks Development & Technical Discussion
Hi Skeeter,I've played around with parallelizing verification (though not as par…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 10:49:15 AM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion
The value of each node is part of the input to the hash for that node. The verif…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 10:35:09 AM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion
The prover cannot, because nodeC.hash = H(4 || nodeC.left_child_hash || nodeC.ri…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 10:26:44 AM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion
The prover could falsify nodeC.val without changing nodeC.hashThe prover cannot,…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 09:25:01 AM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion
It's still logarithmic. You only reveal the preimages of the neighboring hashes…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 09:00:37 AM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion
You are making sense. What I'm saying is that in the iwilcox writeup, all the in…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 08, 2014, 07:48:10 AM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion
My reading of iwilcox's post (well, my reading of the big diagram with nodes cir…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 07, 2014, 05:28:21 PM | ||
A vulnerability in olalonde's implementation of gmaxwell's proof-of-solvency Development & Technical Discussion
Hi charlescharles,Good catch. This actually addressed in iwilcox's writeup --- g…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 07, 2014, 04:31:00 PM | ||
Preventing Asic mining [fork] after next halving would solve a lot of problems. Development & Technical Discussion
The only way to avoid this expense, is to fade out PoW mining altogether, and ch…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 06, 2014, 10:58:28 PM | ||
Preventing Asic mining [fork] after next halving would solve a lot of problems. Development & Technical Discussion
Seems like they have at least the same understanding about the words I was using…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 05, 2014, 02:19:15 PM | ||
Preventing Asic mining [fork] after next halving would solve a lot of problems. Development & Technical Discussion
Sigh, ASIC hardness has been discussed ad nauseum. It is neither possible nor de…
|
n/a | andytoshi | October 05, 2014, 12:52:11 PM | ||
Can side-chains be used to achieve optimal network security / transaction fees? Development & Technical Discussion
When you unlock coins on the mainchain, all that it sees is a SPV proof of owner…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 26, 2014, 10:34:02 PM | ||
BTC fees and micropayments Development & Technical Discussion
@andytoshi: I truely respect your work and don't want to be a troll with you; bu…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 23, 2014, 07:15:09 AM | ||
Alternative ways of spam prevention Development & Technical Discussion
How would it be if the spam transactions are prevented not by transaction fees b…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 22, 2014, 04:43:10 PM | ||
BTC fees and micropayments Development & Technical Discussion
The Bitcoin protocol is perfectly capable of handling micropayments. Most nodes…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 22, 2014, 12:37:54 PM | ||
Hard-Fork to make us have a have a FREE Universal lottery system Development & Technical Discussion
Well, I mean to originate a transaction signed by the private key to which that…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 21, 2014, 10:53:34 AM | ||
Hard-Fork to make us have a have a FREE Universal lottery system Development & Technical Discussion
There would be a change in the protocol so that a specific addressAddresses do n…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 21, 2014, 09:21:42 AM | ||
Is it possible to create a message readable only to the owner of an address? Development & Technical Discussion
Yes I believe I understand that. I thought that by comparing the hash time-stam…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 16, 2014, 03:12:49 PM | ||
Is it possible to create a message readable only to the owner of an address? Development & Technical Discussion
Right. But what if Alice includes a hash of the message in the OP_RETURN-you-ha…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 16, 2014, 02:12:48 PM | ||
Is it possible to create a message readable only to the owner of an address? Development & Technical Discussion
It's still not completely clear to me why, if the goal is to send the message to…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 16, 2014, 11:59:35 AM | ||
Is it possible to create a message readable only to the owner of an address? Development & Technical Discussion
Greg told me that this method is insecure, but I still don't understand why. In…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 16, 2014, 08:54:49 AM | ||
Implementing Secret Sharing with an Encrypted Bitcoin Wallet Development & Technical Discussion
What are you trying to do?Split up the encrypted wallet's private key with ssss…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 15, 2014, 07:13:15 PM | ||
Implementing Secret Sharing with an Encrypted Bitcoin Wallet Development & Technical Discussion
Then use multisignature transactions. SSSS is inappropriate because the secret d…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 15, 2014, 02:18:44 PM | ||
ASIC-resistant Proof of Work Mining (Altcoins)
https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/asic-faq.pdfQuestions 2.5 and 2.6 cover…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 15, 2014, 07:35:05 AM | ||
Implementing Secret Sharing with an Encrypted Bitcoin Wallet Development & Technical Discussion
What are you trying to do?
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 13, 2014, 03:50:38 PM | ||
What will be considered Bitcoin 1.0? Development & Technical Discussion
1. thoroughly solve 51% problem2. eliminate the risk of accepting zero confirmat…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 12, 2014, 08:31:53 PM | ||
Minimal Python address generator Development & Technical Discussion
The majority of the python code is "classic Joric" address-from-user-passphrase…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 12, 2014, 06:03:31 PM | ||
Do SIGHASH_ALL and SIGHASH_NONE sign all inputs? Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteThank you for your answer! I'm still a little confused about the sequence n…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 12, 2014, 05:59:27 PM | ||
Do SIGHASH_ALL and SIGHASH_NONE sign all inputs? Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, except for the SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY flag (which causes only one input to be…
|
n/a | andytoshi | September 12, 2014, 01:27:50 PM |