It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Version 0.6.0 released Bitcoin Discussion
I've been running the released 0.6.0.6-beta Windows version for a few days witho…
|
n/a | BlackEye | April 07, 2012, 10:33:46 AM | ||
Free 2.50 BTC (if you can spend it) (again) Bitcoin Discussion
ROT13 does indeed suck for encryption.
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 20, 2011, 06:08:48 PM | ||
probiwon.com: New gambling shooting game with 94.2% return Marketplace
A quick question. Could you show some pseudocode of how you handle the bets? Doe…
|
n/a | BlackEye | January 26, 2011, 08:31:22 PM | ||
I dont get money Bitcoin Technical Support
But it is not an impossibility. Therefore there is some probability, however sm…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 27, 2010, 06:05:48 PM | ||
I dont get money Bitcoin Technical Support
I haven't checked, but I assume a single Bitcoin client doesn't try to hash the…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 27, 2010, 05:58:22 PM | ||
Bitcoin x86 for Windows Development & Technical Discussion
I added a subset of the Crypto++ 5.6.0 library to the SVN. I stripped it down t…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 27, 2010, 03:47:10 PM | ||
Bitcoin x86 for Windows Development & Technical Discussion
You need to change the assembly instructions that require aligned input to unali…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 27, 2010, 07:43:35 AM | ||
Bitcoin x86 for Windows Development & Technical Discussion
No need to be hostile. I do have a build environment set up, but I am completel…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 26, 2010, 07:38:27 AM | ||
Bitcoin x86 for Windows Development & Technical Discussion
I don't see the source code included with any of your builds. It would be great…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 26, 2010, 07:12:41 AM | ||
Faster SHA-256, MSVC build Development & Technical Discussion
I was able to integrate the SHA256 functionality from Crypto++ 5.6.0 into Bitcoi…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 25, 2010, 05:12:23 PM | ||
Build system Development & Technical Discussion
+1 vote for CMake. The syntax is easy to understand and it can create makefiles…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 25, 2010, 09:02:26 AM | ||
Faster SHA-256, MSVC build Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, my post clearly says I used the latest BDB which will update the database f…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 22, 2010, 01:37:30 PM | ||
Faster SHA-256, MSVC build Development & Technical Discussion
The project file is attached. You'll need to remove the txt extension and chang…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 22, 2010, 08:31:56 AM | ||
Faster SHA-256, MSVC build Development & Technical Discussion
A 32 bit build running on a 32 bit system with the new algorithm is definitely f…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 22, 2010, 07:15:01 AM | ||
Faster SHA-256, MSVC build Development & Technical Discussion
Further examination of the source makes it clear that the hashing is done in blo…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 21, 2010, 04:21:58 PM | ||
Faster SHA-256, MSVC build Development & Technical Discussion
How many bytes does bitcoin typically hash each time?editIt appears, if I'm look…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 20, 2010, 05:50:28 PM | ||
Faster SHA-256, MSVC build Development & Technical Discussion
You could try the SHA2 implementation from : http://polarssl.org/With a simple t…
|
n/a | BlackEye | July 20, 2010, 05:20:05 PM |