It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
![]() |
![]() |
MultiSig BUT with Bitcoin Addresses NOT Public Keys Development & Technical Discussion
Sweet. We should probably:1) Write a test for the other branch as well2) Try sen…
|
n/a | damianmontero | January 09, 2015, 04:54:43 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
MultiSig BUT with Bitcoin Addresses NOT Public Keys Development & Technical Discussion
Just updating the group.We have created successfully a MultiSig Signature from J…
|
n/a | damianmontero | January 09, 2015, 01:51:18 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
MultiSig BUT with Bitcoin Addresses NOT Public Keys Development & Technical Discussion
Let's see that proof. Because if you can help me find the "publicKey" from my EX…
|
n/a | damianmontero | January 09, 2015, 12:08:47 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
MultiSig BUT with Bitcoin Addresses NOT Public Keys Development & Technical Discussion
I just added a quick test for branching versions of pay-to-public-address-hash -…
|
n/a | damianmontero | January 09, 2015, 11:57:17 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
MultiSig BUT with Bitcoin Addresses NOT Public Keys Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteIf you have the android client. if you have a blockchain.info account. You…
|
n/a | damianmontero | January 09, 2015, 10:08:00 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
MultiSig BUT with Bitcoin Addresses NOT Public Keys Development & Technical Discussion
@edmundedgar; using your code and your "bitcoin-branching-transaction-builder"…
|
n/a | damianmontero | January 09, 2015, 12:30:21 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
MultiSig BUT with Bitcoin Addresses NOT Public Keys Development & Technical Discussion
Code:OP_IFOP_DUP OP_HASH160 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG.OP_ELSEOP_DUP OP_HASH160…
|
n/a | damianmontero | January 08, 2015, 11:40:23 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
MultiSig BUT with Bitcoin Addresses NOT Public Keys Development & Technical Discussion
Thank you DeathAndTaxes;How can I make a multiSig address with just regular Bitc…
|
n/a | damianmontero | January 08, 2015, 04:36:19 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
MultiSig BUT with Bitcoin Addresses NOT Public Keys Development & Technical Discussion
I'm building a Bitcoin ATM that will use Multi-Sig for security and I realized I…
|
n/a | damianmontero | January 08, 2015, 02:43:53 PM |