| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
The problem with any variant of PoW is that it will push miners to compete on CP…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 22, 2021, 02:55:15 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteA_hash = Hash(Block Head + sign(Block Head))You don't have to add signature…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 22, 2021, 11:18:04 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteAnd Everyone will broadcast its A_hash and everyone will know that this A_h…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 22, 2021, 03:18:36 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
They can't pretend simply because it's "one cpu one vote". Unless they go and bu…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 22, 2021, 02:33:39 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
But I still dont see how you are stopping individual miners. I guess you're just…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 21, 2021, 11:05:55 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Maybe I'm ignorant about how bitcoin mining works but it seems like a miner coul…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 21, 2021, 04:05:41 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteIf (hash mod N > K), then the miner will move to the next block without cal…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 21, 2021, 04:19:19 AM |
|
|
|
Brute-forcing Bitcoin private keys Development & Technical Discussion
In my opinion we have around 150+ millions crypto addresses. And the market cap…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 20, 2021, 02:32:29 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteNow the question what is the fraction of non-pooled miners in Bitcoin netwo…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 20, 2021, 01:54:22 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
The OP appears to be proposing something that will result in only 0.1% of the mi…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 20, 2021, 09:58:17 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Satoshi first did a lot of coding and testing, and then wrote the whitepaper. I…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 19, 2021, 06:34:46 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
What would be the costs of a “two-round” Proof of Work algorithm compared to reg…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 19, 2021, 03:51:29 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
What would be the costs of a “two-round” Proof of Work algorithm compared to reg…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 19, 2021, 01:51:09 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Which will help the environment by reducing the machines productionOn the contra…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 18, 2021, 05:07:55 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
I think it's great just how it is regarding Proof of work. But I'm always intere…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 18, 2021, 05:13:07 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think TRPoW is a recipe for disaster. Far from it. Keep in mind that Bit…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 17, 2021, 11:19:49 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteI don't think TRPoW is a recipe for disaster.Then go for it, release just a…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 17, 2021, 02:08:38 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
It's not even necessarily economical. People will just ramp up their hashing pow…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 16, 2021, 11:30:07 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteYou would need a way to prevent the knowledge of the winner for 8 minutes s…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 16, 2021, 10:22:36 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
tl;dr - total electric consumption will not be reduced by implementing the OP's…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 16, 2021, 09:45:09 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Please explain how a lower complexity reduces the amount of energy used when min…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 16, 2021, 09:23:26 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteN1-N2 miners are IDLE during 6min of Round 2.Some of them are idle, some of…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 16, 2021, 09:33:11 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Where is the energy saving here, when the miner will have lower electricity bill…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 16, 2021, 01:42:18 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Where is the energy saving here, when the miner will have lower electricity bill…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 16, 2021, 12:40:45 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Where is the energy saving here, when the miner will have lower electricity bill…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 16, 2021, 12:01:14 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
If you don't accept a block by someone not in your list, then you can't follow t…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 08:35:29 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Keep in mind that in order to win a block reward, you need to be in the list of…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 07:41:09 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteI think a solution would be to eliminate the PoW in the second round and si…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 05:18:50 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
I don't believe your proposal reduces energy consumption. Energy consumption in…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 05:07:31 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteThe N2 number of miners of the second is also adjustable like the complexit…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 04:49:29 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteAnd your block will be accepted ONLY if your name was in the List of N2 of…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 04:43:09 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteSo you will always need to show that you were in Round 1 at some points. An…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 04:36:23 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteSo you will always need to show that you were in Round 1 at some points. An…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 04:25:46 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuotePlease share the white paper PDF here if you still have it.Wayback Machine…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 04:05:53 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
tl;dr - total electric consumption will not be reduced by implementing the OP's…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 03:49:23 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteI think a solution would be to eliminate the PoW in the second round and si…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 03:42:40 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteIn an ideal world with TRPoW, most miners will spend their time moving from…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 03:31:39 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
tl;dr - total electric consumption will not be reduced by implementing the OP's…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 02:29:41 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
In an ideal world with TRPoW, most miners will spend their time moving from one…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 02:02:21 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
The electricity will be reduced by the fact that Round 1 is not computing-intens…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 15, 2021, 01:23:56 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
The electricity will be reduced by the fact that Round 1 is not computing-intens…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 14, 2021, 11:52:01 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Hi Odolv,It is explained actually in section 3 (Figure) and 4.Anyway, In the TRP…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 14, 2021, 11:10:22 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Thank you very much for your reply. I read the thread. It is quite interesting i…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 14, 2021, 07:18:05 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
You can download my PDF directly here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XVwMuDHI…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 13, 2021, 08:58:35 PM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Thank you for your quick reply. Once in the second round, the behavior is like B…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 13, 2021, 11:58:58 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
I've got an idea, and I would like to share it with you here to discussed/ripped…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 13, 2021, 10:50:01 AM |
|
|
|
A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW Development & Technical Discussion
Yes. I totally agree with you. The best way to test the idea is to actually crea…
|
n/a | Epictetus | November 14, 2021, 12:24:30 AM |
Pages:
Jump to: