It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
@NanoAkron I speak with no authority at all on BitID. In fact, I have nothing to…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 30, 2014, 07:19:52 PM | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Your focus on preventing zero-day abuse shows you're really thinking of it as a…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 30, 2014, 10:10:09 AM | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
- Am I right if I say that in this system, stake is validated only one time when…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 30, 2014, 09:59:12 AM | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
It creates a very strong constraint with the age of bitcoins but as you wrote th…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 29, 2014, 09:07:36 AM | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
On its side, your schema seems interesting for the very different use case of fo…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 29, 2014, 08:47:13 AM | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Think about it on a fundamental level - he's asking you to trust wealthier peopl…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 29, 2014, 08:26:27 AM | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
For practical purposes, users will sign in with BitID using their wallet (the ne…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 29, 2014, 08:04:56 AM | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
@gacrux I agree with you that protocol specs should address spam issue server si…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 29, 2014, 12:51:28 AM | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
This approach is interesting, but I can't see how having coins for a long time o…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 29, 2014, 12:14:10 AM | ||
[ANNOUNCE] Bitcoin Proof-of-Stake Altcoin Discussion
Not directly related to your round-robin rotating single mint idea (which I stil…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 28, 2014, 01:21:12 AM | ||
[BIP][Draft] BitID - "Connect with Bitcoin" protocol Development & Technical Discussion
A big problem on the internet today is the cheapness of identity. Many sites str…
|
n/a | gacrux | April 27, 2014, 11:27:22 PM | ||
What you need to know about Transaction mutability ... Bitcoin Discussion
Bitcoin is fantastic for a whole lot of things, but Point-of-Sale doesn't seem t…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 13, 2014, 10:39:05 PM | ||
What you need to know about Transaction mutability ... Bitcoin Discussion
Bitcoin is fantastic for a whole lot of things, but Point-of-Sale doesn't seem t…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 13, 2014, 09:25:09 PM | ||
[ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official Announcements (Altcoins)
The only thing I can think of is that Counterparty sends BTC from a specific add…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 12, 2014, 09:16:32 PM | ||
[ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official Announcements (Altcoins)
The thing I don't like about XCP escrow is the added complexity to what should r…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 11, 2014, 08:32:40 PM | ||
[ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official Announcements (Altcoins)
What the dev's have to say about the problems/fees being burned to miners:Please…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 11, 2014, 09:30:41 AM | ||
[ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official Announcements (Altcoins)
I have put a required fee of 0.0006 BTC (http://blockscan.com/order.aspx?q=3693)…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 11, 2014, 05:50:39 AM | ||
[ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official Announcements (Altcoins)
It seems that adding more fees that either go to miners or otherwise get burned…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 10, 2014, 06:41:46 AM | ||
[ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official Announcements (Altcoins)
Heads up, I see some more invalid order matches:3288 284402 1AQPf7f3y37NN9Xs…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 06, 2014, 09:35:29 PM | ||
[ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official Announcements (Altcoins)
Heads up, I see some more invalid order matches:3288 284402 1AQPf7f3y37NN9Xs…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 06, 2014, 08:40:03 AM | ||
[BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer Service Announcements (Altcoins)
I've found another (major) difference between blockscan.com and counterpartyd:ht…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 06, 2014, 08:00:10 AM | ||
[BlockScan] New CounterParty (XCP) Block Explorer Service Announcements (Altcoins)
I've found another (major) difference between blockscan.com and counterpartyd:ht…
|
n/a | gacrux | February 06, 2014, 06:44:01 AM |