It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Tiebreaking standard using the blockchain? Bitcoin Discussion
If you want to use multiple blocks, then pre-define a set of block heights. Repe…
|
n/a | iddo | May 17, 2016, 12:55:26 PM | ||
Tiebreaking standard using the blockchain? Bitcoin Discussion
This new "Bitcoin Beacon" paper has some answers to the OP:http://arxiv.org/abs/…
|
n/a | iddo | May 17, 2016, 04:57:35 AM | ||
[2014-06-20] Proof of Activity: Extending Bitcoin's Proof of Work via POS Press
He accepts a block with the transaction. It is 1 conf, but not 0-confIt's 0-PoW-…
|
n/a | iddo | June 18, 2015, 01:44:35 AM | ||
[2014-06-20] Proof of Activity: Extending Bitcoin's Proof of Work via POS Press
1. he makes one block with his own transaction to merchant and sends this block…
|
n/a | iddo | June 16, 2015, 10:15:33 AM | ||
[2014-06-20] Proof of Activity: Extending Bitcoin's Proof of Work via POS Press
4. Also we noticed a possible problem with the original PoA. ONLY the "last" "st…
|
n/a | iddo | June 14, 2015, 01:43:58 PM | ||
New HD wallet that tolerates leakage of some child private keys Development & Technical Discussion
So I think it would be an obvious improvement and might well be worth an increas…
|
n/a | iddo | January 29, 2015, 01:57:01 PM | ||
New HD wallet that tolerates leakage of some child private keys Development & Technical Discussion
So I think that your original non-hierarchical secret sharing variant makes more…
|
n/a | iddo | January 29, 2015, 01:35:58 PM | ||
New HD wallet that tolerates leakage of some child private keys Development & Technical Discussion
If you really want to give each child a,b,c,... ability to reveal up to na,nb,nc…
|
n/a | iddo | January 29, 2015, 05:39:36 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
1. we need to be able to have an internal organization create the seeds on beha…
|
n/a | iddo | October 22, 2014, 03:12:12 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Re: deniable encryptionThe simple use-case for deniable encryption is an attacke…
|
n/a | iddo | July 10, 2014, 04:59:30 AM | ||
Preventing Pool Mining Development & Technical Discussion
This is an old idea http://bitcoinstats.com/irc/bitcoin-dev/logs/2011/11/21#l13…
|
n/a | iddo | June 23, 2014, 07:07:22 PM | ||
Proof of Activity Proposal Development & Technical Discussion
I meant to ask: If there's only a value cap, that'd mean a miner could trivially…
|
n/a | iddo | June 23, 2014, 04:14:14 PM | ||
Proof of Activity Proposal Development & Technical Discussion
I suppose it will just readjust based on the implicit(explicit?) fraction of BTC…
|
n/a | iddo | June 20, 2014, 04:00:21 PM | ||
Proof of Activity Proposal Development & Technical Discussion
PoA academic paper is now public:http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/452It was accepted…
|
n/a | iddo | June 14, 2014, 11:33:48 PM | ||
Proof of Activity Proposal Development & Technical Discussion
About the weird post above by coinxed: coins can be destroyed by not redeeming t…
|
n/a | iddo | June 20, 2014, 06:40:25 AM | ||
Proof of Activity Proposal Development & Technical Discussion
BTW, just to give a few concrete numbers that compare our PoA protocol with Bitc…
|
n/a | iddo | December 18, 2012, 10:37:31 AM | ||
Multi-PPS Pools |
n/a | iddo | May 30, 2014, 08:36:48 PM | ||
Multi-PPS Pools |
n/a | iddo | May 27, 2014, 11:19:13 PM | ||
new paper: Securing Bitcoin wallets via threshold signatures Development & Technical Discussion
https://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/stevenag/new-research-better-wallet-security-…
|
n/a | iddo | March 30, 2014, 11:49:23 AM | ||
ZeroCash: 2nd gen with anonymization starting from the coinbase transaction Announcements (Altcoins)
FYI there's a newer ZeroCash talk by Eli Ben-Sasson at:https://www.youtube.com/w…
|
n/a | iddo | March 27, 2014, 04:35:49 AM | ||
Zerocoin: Anonymous Distributed E-Cash from Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
FYI there's a newer ZeroCash talk by Eli Ben-Sasson at:https://www.youtube.com/w…
|
n/a | iddo | March 26, 2014, 07:57:46 AM | ||
Dual SNARK: How to make ZKP with trusted initilization trustless in some cases. Development & Technical Discussion
For example, say I want to pay you conditional on you publishing a solution to a…
|
n/a | iddo | March 16, 2014, 03:56:08 AM | ||
Paper discusses solution to transaction malleability Development & Technical Discussion
I'll reply to myself, because I discussed it with Bitcoin devs at #bitcoin-wizar…
|
n/a | iddo | March 06, 2014, 11:42:16 AM | ||
Paper discusses solution to transaction malleability Development & Technical Discussion
Given the recent interest in transaction malleability, I'd like to bump this old…
|
n/a | iddo | March 04, 2014, 11:20:08 AM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
Most mining now is done in certain hot spots, such as the big mine of Iceland [1…
|
n/a | iddo | January 06, 2014, 03:57:21 AM | ||
My proposal for GHOST protocol Development & Technical Discussion
If chain selection would depend on other node's proof of work as long as its wor…
|
n/a | iddo | January 05, 2014, 06:29:17 PM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
In practice, this isn't really a problem, because the 2 rules almost always give…
|
n/a | iddo | January 05, 2014, 06:42:30 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Because of the (mod n) operation, it looks to me like any possible value of IL w…
|
n/a | iddo | January 03, 2014, 09:33:17 PM | ||
Anon136's NXT Giveaway Thread (weighted by forum notoriety) Altcoin Discussion
9750296245072558888thanks
|
n/a | iddo | December 26, 2013, 08:33:14 PM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
F(prev_utxo_tree_hash, transaction set for current block) = utxo_tree_hashI mean…
|
n/a | iddo | December 18, 2013, 04:40:32 AM | ||
[LTC] Changing the litecoin Proof of Work function to avoid ASIC mining? Altcoin Discussion
No, because I want LTC to strengthen (higher hashrate leads to stronger network)…
|
n/a | iddo | December 18, 2013, 04:47:35 AM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
The output of the validation could be the unspent outputsLong output will blowup…
|
n/a | iddo | December 10, 2013, 03:41:58 PM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
Maybe. The proof needs to be verifiable without any blockchain data. Regular SNA…
|
n/a | iddo | December 09, 2013, 07:44:16 PM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
I think the point of being zero knowledge is that you don't have to download the…
|
n/a | iddo | December 09, 2013, 02:49:08 PM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
Guys, what you're talking about doesn't benefit from zero-knowledge, please goog…
|
n/a | iddo | December 09, 2013, 11:40:16 AM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
jtimon, why zero-knowledge? And relying on a single validator is bad, because th…
|
n/a | iddo | December 09, 2013, 10:06:30 AM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
There is no possibility for non-convergence. The most-work tree eventually wins…
|
n/a | iddo | December 07, 2013, 06:29:45 PM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
2) This is a local-only change that does not require consensus. It's okay for li…
|
n/a | iddo | December 07, 2013, 05:09:29 PM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
iddo, I think there are two things to point out with respect to that wizards' co…
|
n/a | iddo | December 07, 2013, 04:21:48 PM | ||
New paper: Accelerating Bitcoin's Trasaction Processing Development & Technical Discussion
After some discussion at #bitcoin-wizards (freenode IRC) with Aviv Zohar and sev…
|
n/a | iddo | December 07, 2013, 12:10:02 PM | ||
[LTC] Changing the litecoin Proof of Work function to avoid ASIC mining? Altcoin Discussion
I suspect that gmaxwell started this discussion in order to let LTC fail. Changi…
|
n/a | iddo | December 06, 2013, 12:48:56 PM | ||
[LTC] Changing the litecoin Proof of Work function to avoid ASIC mining? Altcoin Discussion
The miners can vote on whether they wish to change a protocol rule, as was the c…
|
n/a | iddo | December 06, 2013, 02:34:21 AM | ||
[LTC] Changing the litecoin Proof of Work function to avoid ASIC mining? Altcoin Discussion
Anyway, I believe it's morally wrong to change the POW 2+ years after launching…
|
n/a | iddo | December 06, 2013, 01:31:02 AM | ||
[LTC] Changing the litecoin Proof of Work function to avoid ASIC mining? Altcoin Discussion
Nobody wants to invest in something if the rules are just going to be changed la…
|
n/a | iddo | December 06, 2013, 01:24:11 AM | ||
[LTC] Changing the litecoin Proof of Work function to avoid ASIC mining? Altcoin Discussion
As far as a PoW that will be more ASIC resistant. What about Momentum PoW.. what…
|
n/a | iddo | December 06, 2013, 12:55:54 AM | ||
[LTC] Changing the litecoin Proof of Work function to avoid ASIC mining? Altcoin Discussion
Nothing is ASIC proof,A point I've argued many times. But in hindsight I was som…
|
n/a | iddo | December 06, 2013, 12:12:27 AM | ||
[LTC] Changing the litecoin Proof of Work function to avoid ASIC mining? Altcoin Discussion
tacotime and myself did a few benchmarks with tweaked scrypt params: https://bit…
|
n/a | iddo | December 05, 2013, 11:22:44 PM | ||
Wooden pinball-like stations that require thinking/coordination, 10% discount Goods
Listed with an extra discount at:http://www.bitcoinblackfriday.com/#cat=11http:/…
|
n/a | iddo | November 29, 2013, 12:51:13 AM | ||
the Block Discarding Attack / shellfish mining Development & Technical Discussion
You might be interested in my take on the issue (quite different from a computer…
|
n/a | iddo | November 07, 2013, 06:48:01 PM | ||
the Block Discarding Attack / shellfish mining Development & Technical Discussion
I can confirm that Lear has discussed with me the results of his research a day…
|
n/a | iddo | November 06, 2013, 05:45:08 PM | ||
Welcome Noobs-T-Shirts Goods
I bought 3 shirts and received the (ground) shipment after 2 weeks.Cool shirts,…
|
n/a | iddo | October 27, 2013, 09:17:59 AM | ||
Namecoin was stillborn, I had to switch off life-support Altcoin Discussion
Anyway, IMHO, Namecoin, while perhaps not perfect, has been running for a couple…
|
n/a | iddo | October 15, 2013, 02:35:24 PM | ||
Wooden pinball-like stations that require thinking/coordination, 10% discount Goods |
n/a | iddo | October 07, 2013, 01:24:36 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
Similarly to atomic cross-chain trading (link), I think that a fair coin toss (w…
|
n/a | iddo | August 18, 2013, 09:14:29 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
But that sounds fragile per my comment above: what if the user is using determin…
|
n/a | iddo | September 24, 2013, 03:38:47 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
No Bob should broadcast his bet transaction before asking alice to do anything (…
|
n/a | iddo | September 24, 2013, 06:31:35 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
If TxA' gets mined instead of TxA then TxB will be invalid and so no refund exis…
|
n/a | iddo | September 24, 2013, 06:43:29 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
Before the escrow payment confirms, however, Alice announces a mutant version of…
|
n/a | iddo | September 23, 2013, 07:27:44 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
One very tiny request - could you please use regular script form instead of inve…
|
n/a | iddo | September 23, 2013, 03:44:46 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
4. Bob creates a "bet" transaction that takes as input 2X of his own coins, and…
|
n/a | iddo | September 23, 2013, 05:32:26 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | iddo | September 22, 2013, 02:10:22 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
Hi Adam,Your post #32 is a little unclear to me: when you say INPUT(2v) I think…
|
n/a | iddo | September 21, 2013, 05:32:17 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
It seems multiple people studied this protocol by now and there are no issues, s…
|
n/a | iddo | September 17, 2013, 05:04:33 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
Quote from: iddoIsn't there a timing risk here, where Bob is lucky enough to hav…
|
n/a | iddo | September 20, 2013, 08:38:41 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
So setup as before using your example, first both parties create a multi-input c…
|
n/a | iddo | September 20, 2013, 07:21:06 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
But I have a simpler more generic new idea - let the committing party win by def…
|
n/a | iddo | September 20, 2013, 05:11:44 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
How much coins are we talking about that we want to avoid a third-party? Or is t…
|
n/a | iddo | September 18, 2013, 05:36:57 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
My suggestion:1. Alice and Bob each lock up 3x the amount of bet using special i…
|
n/a | iddo | September 17, 2013, 02:58:00 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
The loser could do this if they're not using iddo's protocol.The point is that i…
|
n/a | iddo | September 16, 2013, 05:14:07 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
With regard to reading the LSB, there's OP_MOD in the Bitcoin script language th…
|
n/a | iddo | September 16, 2013, 06:05:45 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
Nice one iddo. Perhaps we should add that to the contracts wiki page.So are you…
|
n/a | iddo | September 16, 2013, 05:41:17 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | iddo | September 16, 2013, 03:23:10 PM | ||
REWARD offered for hash collisions for SHA1, SHA256, RIPEMD160 and other Development & Technical Discussion
The updated system requires the hashing function and the signing algorithm to be…
|
n/a | iddo | September 16, 2013, 05:08:10 AM | ||
Deterministic Usage of DSA and ECDSA Digital Signature Algorithms (RFC 6979) Development & Technical Discussion
If you have non-memory access related power or timing side channels (e.g. like a…
|
n/a | iddo | September 11, 2013, 06:59:01 AM | ||
Deterministic Usage of DSA and ECDSA Digital Signature Algorithms (RFC 6979) Development & Technical Discussion
I reached out to Colin Percival (who wrote scrypt, for example) for his thoughts…
|
n/a | iddo | September 10, 2013, 03:51:31 AM | ||
ECDSA Weak signing Development & Technical Discussion
If you go around disallowing a bunch of K values then you're decreasing security…
|
n/a | iddo | September 10, 2013, 03:08:17 AM | ||
ECDSA Weak signing Development & Technical Discussion
Huh? You're describing how to carry out one particular attack that succeeds with…
|
n/a | iddo | September 09, 2013, 10:59:26 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
One was my request for an audit of my deterministic wallet solution, which does…
|
n/a | iddo | August 26, 2013, 11:40:45 AM | ||
CoinCovenants using SCIP signatures, an amusingly bad idea. Development & Technical Discussion
Well that's the thing really: you don't actually need SCIP to do covenants - SCI…
|
n/a | iddo | August 22, 2013, 02:04:48 PM | ||
CoinCovenants using SCIP signatures, an amusingly bad idea. Development & Technical Discussion
- it-feels-good-to-pretend-to-be-regular covenant: Spending block is required to…
|
n/a | iddo | August 22, 2013, 02:02:08 PM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion
I tried to convince Meni that it cannot easily be done if the party that learns…
|
n/a | iddo | August 20, 2013, 02:18:02 PM | ||
Proposal: usage and termonology of a BIP32 wallet Development & Technical Discussion
I agree in general that it's a good idea to make the Bitcoin client operate (by…
|
n/a | iddo | August 20, 2013, 02:29:14 PM | ||
Proposal: usage and termonology of a BIP32 wallet Development & Technical Discussion
I agree in general that it's a good idea to make the Bitcoin client operate (by…
|
n/a | iddo | August 20, 2013, 03:11:26 AM | ||
fair coin toss with no extortion and no need to trust a third party Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | iddo | August 20, 2013, 11:38:44 AM | ||
Really Really ultimate blockchain compression: CoinWitness Development & Technical Discussion
In general you'd provably destroy the coins in the off-chain system, in a way wh…
|
n/a | iddo | August 19, 2013, 01:46:21 PM | ||
Really Really ultimate blockchain compression: CoinWitness Development & Technical Discussion
It seems to me that this general framework that Gregory Maxwell describes here s…
|
n/a | iddo | August 20, 2013, 10:02:08 AM | ||
CoinCovenants using SCIP signatures, an amusingly bad idea. Development & Technical Discussion
(Actually accomplishing this requires a bit of a hack: a SCIP program can't have…
|
n/a | iddo | August 20, 2013, 09:50:15 AM | ||
Really Really ultimate blockchain compression: CoinWitness Development & Technical Discussion
An observation regarding privacy/fungibility: if a user sends a tainted coin eve…
|
n/a | iddo | August 19, 2013, 06:36:44 PM | ||
Really Really ultimate blockchain compression: CoinWitness Development & Technical Discussion
Right, I see now. The thing that I missed is that you'd provably destroy the coi…
|
n/a | iddo | August 19, 2013, 03:52:55 PM | ||
Really Really ultimate blockchain compression: CoinWitness Development & Technical Discussion
The user who can create the Bitcoin transaction that redeems the coin back into…
|
n/a | iddo | August 19, 2013, 11:57:14 AM | ||
Really Really ultimate blockchain compression: CoinWitness Development & Technical Discussion
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's still possible to double spend the transcripte…
|
n/a | iddo | August 19, 2013, 11:35:06 AM | ||
Really Really ultimate blockchain compression: CoinWitness Development & Technical Discussion
When a user of one of these coins wants to exit the system (to compact its histo…
|
n/a | iddo | August 19, 2013, 11:16:31 AM | ||
Giveaway Thread for "MasterCoins" - the new protocol layer built on bitcoin Project Development
1JpVUU3VQjkYKSfot6PDQXs8un11Dg2ZZNI'll put it in my signature too.Thanks.
|
n/a | iddo | August 15, 2013, 03:19:03 AM | ||
Market-Based Solution to the Decentralization vs. Speed Trade-off Altcoin Discussion
For one such a fork to happen we need to have one-third of the gold holders to s…
|
n/a | iddo | December 01, 2012, 11:20:09 AM | ||
WebcoinX: colored coin web client demo Project Development
I tried it now, it mostly works quite nicely...Issues:1) When reloading the page…
|
n/a | iddo | July 31, 2013, 02:45:00 PM | ||
Wooden pinball-like stations that require thinking/coordination, 10% discount Goods
i love this. please keep your discount up for the future, I would like to make a…
|
n/a | iddo | July 22, 2013, 09:20:33 AM | ||
Wooden pinball-like stations that require thinking/coordination, 10% discount Goods
My familiy's business now accepts Bitcoin: http://aviot.com/vb/index.htmlWe are…
|
n/a | iddo | July 20, 2013, 01:03:53 PM | ||
[XPM] [ANN] Primecoin Release - First Scientific Computing Cryptocurrency Announcements (Altcoins)
In primecoin a similar checkpoint system is present, but it's user enabled, and…
|
n/a | iddo | July 09, 2013, 10:07:13 AM | ||
Eternal Choice for the Dark Side Attack (ECDSA) and the Safe Mode solution Development & Technical Discussion
Also in Safe Mode, the clients do not accept any chain reorganization of length…
|
n/a | iddo | June 27, 2013, 11:56:13 AM | ||
Zerocoin: Anonymous Distributed E-Cash from Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
... it feels to me like finding an essentially zero-cost way to increase transac…
|
n/a | iddo | June 02, 2013, 05:50:14 AM |