It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Block chain size/storage and slow downloads for new users Bitcoin Discussion
Thank you for the clarifications.(...) At some point client A starts sending you…
|
n/a | jctech | June 26, 2014, 12:15:55 PM | ||
Block chain size/storage and slow downloads for new users Bitcoin Discussion
I think the problem here is not the size of the blockchain itself. The problem i…
|
n/a | jctech | June 26, 2014, 10:16:19 AM | ||
Taking Down Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
3. Use the mined profits and/or more taxpayer's money to purchase more mining ha…
|
n/a | jctech | June 07, 2014, 05:22:37 PM | ||
Re: Taking Down Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
The attack scenario you came up with it incredibly expensive, and then uses that…
|
n/a | jctech | June 07, 2014, 04:01:00 PM | ||
Taking Down Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
In order to gain 99% of the network hash rate, you need to increase the current…
|
n/a | jctech | June 07, 2014, 04:19:55 PM | ||
Re: Taking Down Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
Of course if you had provable decentralized timestamps you wouldn't need mining…
|
n/a | jctech | June 07, 2014, 04:09:55 PM | ||
Taking Down Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
Your proposal won't work, because there is no centralized timing source.Well, if…
|
n/a | jctech | June 07, 2014, 03:00:56 PM | ||
Re: Taking Down Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
Well, this discussion was interesting but it died off about 2 years ago and nowh…
|
n/a | jctech | June 05, 2014, 06:11:26 PM |