| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
"John Dillon" We can leak things too you trolling piece of shit Bitcoin Discussion
http://pastebin.com/4BcycXUu
|
n/a | jdillon | November 16, 2013, 11:47:55 AM |
|
|
|
Mike Hearn, Foundation's Law & Policy Chair, is pushing blacklists right now Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | jdillon | November 14, 2013, 11:04:20 AM |
|
|
|
Mike Hearn, Foundation's Law & Policy Chair, is pushing blacklists right now Bitcoin Discussion
reddit discussionHearn posted the following message to the legal section of the…
|
n/a | jdillon | November 14, 2013, 10:58:51 AM |
|
|
|
CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world Development & Technical Discussion
I'd like the administrators of this bounty to make clear some conditions for a l…
|
n/a | jdillon | August 28, 2013, 10:00:36 PM |
|
|
|
CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world (someday!) Development & Technical Discussion
Edit: donating moreI may be jumping the gun a bit, but please accept this 10.11B…
|
n/a | jdillon | August 25, 2013, 11:41:07 PM |
|
|
|
Implementing Oracle Contracts - Feedback Requested Development & Technical Discussion
Alp: This work looks really interesting. I'm also excited how Peter figured out…
|
n/a | jdillon | July 28, 2013, 02:52:40 PM |
|
|
|
Testing so that opcodes can be re-enabled Development & Technical Discussion
The root cause of this disagreement is that I don't perceive Bitcoin as robust i…
|
n/a | jdillon | July 14, 2013, 03:10:15 PM |
|
|
|
Zerocoin when? Development & Technical Discussion
For people reading along, Peter routinely says "we" will do things that he hasn'…
|
n/a | jdillon | July 06, 2013, 02:15:10 PM |
|
|
|
Double-Spending Fast Payments in Bitcoin due to Client versions 0.8.1 Development & Technical Discussion
The Bitcoin developers are well aware of this non-issue: http://sourceforge.net/…
|
n/a | jdillon | July 06, 2013, 01:34:37 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting Development & Technical Discussion
I need to get better at not touching that "show/hide" option... But on IRC yeste…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 29, 2013, 01:06:56 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting Development & Technical Discussion
jdillon: I'll do a write-up in a week or so if you are interested, but waiting a…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 29, 2013, 12:40:48 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting Development & Technical Discussion
Unfortunately you are quite wrong there. Pools can easily peer with each other w…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 29, 2013, 11:26:55 AM |
|
|
|
Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting Development & Technical Discussion
This also applies to your proposal. 51% of miners can reject all "status quo vot…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 28, 2013, 05:40:54 AM |
|
|
|
Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting Development & Technical Discussion
The problem with your proposal is that it counts anyone creating transactions on…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 16, 2013, 12:53:46 AM |
|
|
|
Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting Development & Technical Discussion
Voting has its own risks. After all, democracy is the original 51% attack, as Er…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 15, 2013, 01:47:34 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting Development & Technical Discussion
Voting is a simple, automatic process. Your wallet would have a pop-up when you…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 15, 2013, 01:18:16 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting Development & Technical Discussion
(also posted to the -dev email list)-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA2…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 09, 2013, 11:09:07 PM |
|
|
|
Cooperative unmixing for anti-money-laundering Development & Technical Discussion
I think one of the issues that most people have with this type of proposal is th…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 09, 2013, 07:31:32 PM |
|
|
|
Please do not change MAX_BLOCK_SIZE Development & Technical Discussion
Nothing has been consulted with a community - Gavin jumps into the thread with a…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 04, 2013, 09:35:52 AM |
|
|
|
Please do not change MAX_BLOCK_SIZE Development & Technical Discussion
angry internet trolls like ShadowOfHarbringer and Gavin.I'm doing well this mont…
|
n/a | jdillon | June 04, 2013, 10:04:45 AM |
|
|
|
New video: Why the blocksize limit keeps Bitcoin free and decentralized Bitcoin Discussion
This contrasts sharply with the vision of Bitcoin as a monolithic one-world curr…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 28, 2013, 02:43:50 AM |
|
|
|
New video: Why the blocksize limit keeps Bitcoin free and decentralized Bitcoin Discussion
I finally got a chance to see your new video. It's solid professional work, you…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 28, 2013, 01:32:18 AM |
|
|
|
How you will pay for Bitcoin network access services in the future Bitcoin Discussion
I personally believe that a large company such as google, which has tons of data…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 13, 2013, 09:17:35 PM |
|
|
|
Initial replace-by-fee implementation is now available on testnet Development & Technical Discussion
jgarzik: So on the blocksize issue we do roughly agree on the problem, if not as…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 13, 2013, 03:27:09 AM |
|
|
|
How you will pay for Bitcoin network access services in the future Bitcoin Discussion
Yes. Mike's efforts are valuable, such as recently getting Bitcoin extension in…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 12, 2013, 02:49:32 AM |
|
|
|
How you will pay for Bitcoin network access services in the future Bitcoin Discussion
I don't think Google pay Mike Hearn to work on Bitcoin, he moonlights on his own…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 12, 2013, 02:36:38 AM |
|
|
|
WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs Bitcoin Discussion
gweedo and johnblaze: Take your silly fight elsewhere and don't clog up this imp…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 12, 2013, 02:10:31 AM |
|
|
|
51% attack is a myth Bitcoin Discussion
What if we can map the flow of data geographically? mapping the fiber optic cabl…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 12, 2013, 02:08:35 AM |
|
|
|
How you will pay for Bitcoin network access services in the future Bitcoin Discussion
Excellent post! Unfortunately that everyone is sticking their heads in the sand…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 12, 2013, 01:21:01 AM |
|
|
|
Progress on the Bitcoincard development Service Discussion
Will all Bitcoincard transactions have to go on the blockchain and hence pay fee…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 12, 2013, 01:24:16 AM |
|
|
|
51% attack is a myth Bitcoin Discussion
That's almost correct, but it doesn't take into account orphaned blocks. Each or…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 12, 2013, 01:19:59 AM |
|
|
|
Initial replace-by-fee implementation is now available on testnet Development & Technical Discussion
Please explain to me why this is inevitable? Every miner that implements this wi…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 12, 2013, 12:53:46 AM |
|
|
|
WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs Bitcoin Discussion
Who gets to decide how slow is too slow?(...)Solo mining or running a pool will…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 11, 2013, 11:53:12 PM |
|
|
|
Reminder: zero-conf is not safe; $1000USD reward posted for replace-by-fee patch Development & Technical Discussion
An initial implementation is available for testing.See new thread here: https://…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 09, 2013, 05:22:54 AM |
|
|
|
Initial replace-by-fee implementation is now available on testnet Development & Technical Discussion
(reposting the bitcoin-development email for visibility)-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 09, 2013, 04:59:57 AM |
|
|
|
Do we want to work with money regulators, or keep Bitcoin unregulated? Bitcoin Discussion
The OP also brought up another question though... how do we fund useful developm…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 08, 2013, 09:58:31 PM |
|
|
|
WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs Bitcoin Discussion
It's a pity read this assert.The most useful thing of bitcoin is micropays. If y…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 08, 2013, 08:12:45 PM |
|
|
|
WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs Bitcoin Discussion
Just a thought (not intended in opposition to this change, which is a band-aid t…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 08:59:29 PM |
|
|
|
Add miner fee after transaction sent? Bitcoin Discussion
If you send a transaction with no miners fee, and miners are only accepting tran…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 08:30:45 PM |
|
|
|
Boycott 0.8.2 Bitcoin Discussion
It shouldn't be on by default, it should be off by default like it is in the whi…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 04:56:43 PM |
|
|
|
Boycott 0.8.2 Bitcoin Discussion
What is the dev's reasoning for blocking microtransactions? Is it to avoid peopl…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 04:53:49 PM |
|
|
|
I thought the idea was to prune spent outputs, not block new transactions? Bitcoin Discussion
I thought the general consensus on blockchain size management was to prune spent…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 04:51:01 PM |
|
|
|
WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs Bitcoin Discussion
I assume that people in this thread don't really understand how serious is the s…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 03:39:24 PM |
|
|
|
Altruism vs Rationality in the Bitcoin protocol: possible future Bitcoin problem Bitcoin Discussion
So you want to create a boys club of high-hashrate miners to shut out all the pe…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 12:34:53 PM |
|
|
|
WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs Bitcoin Discussion
Got it. So, if I wanted, I could create a pool for micro transactions? Anyone wa…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 02:48:42 PM |
|
|
|
WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs Bitcoin Discussion
Gavin Andresen has changed the Bitcoin code to block any output with a value of…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 01:51:20 PM |
|
|
|
WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs Bitcoin Discussion
Yes, the price on money transfers will be determined by free markets. It is not…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 02:18:13 PM |
|
|
|
WARNING! Bitcoin will soon block small transaction outputs Bitcoin Discussion
ASICMINER usually includes many share payments in a single transaction. some pay…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 02:00:53 PM |
|
|
|
Altruism vs Rationality in the Bitcoin protocol: possible future Bitcoin problem Bitcoin Discussion
I don't want mining to be controlled by a cartel, but it might be the kind of in…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 01:44:50 PM |
|
|
|
Improving the trustworthyness of PGP keys with Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
OK, so here's the problem:You want to associate an email with a PGP fingerprint…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 12:31:06 PM |
|
|
|
Improving the trustworthyness of PGP keys with Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
retep: Clever. Well at least I demonstrated one thing successfully.Any idea what…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 12:05:31 PM |
|
|
|
pooled mining luck theft attack? Development & Technical Discussion
I outlined a scheme to achieve a zero-trust, unskimmable and non-server-hackable…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 05, 2013, 11:55:16 AM |
|
|
|
Make protecting and promoting decentralization a Bitcoin Foundation goal Bitcoin Discussion
I've opened a pull request to add the protection and promotion of decentralizati…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 02, 2013, 11:15:45 PM |
|
|
|
Improving the trustworthyness of PGP keys with Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
I don't understand.What's to stop an impostor creating a key for that address an…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 02, 2013, 05:17:31 AM |
|
|
|
Do we want to work with money regulators, or keep Bitcoin unregulated? Bitcoin Discussion
The OP's post is very slippery. It's written as if it's describing the situation…
|
n/a | jdillon | May 01, 2013, 10:08:33 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Blocksize Problem Video Bitcoin Discussion
Median cost of a dedicated server with lots of bandwidth, disk and CPU is under…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 30, 2013, 08:16:00 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Blocksize Problem Video Bitcoin Discussion
The block size problem is just one of a number of problems that are coming bitco…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 28, 2013, 11:27:54 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Blocksize Problem Video Bitcoin Discussion
My reaction: stop spreading FUD.There are very real concepts being discussed he…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 28, 2013, 08:12:24 PM |
|
|
|
Keeping Bitcoin Decentralized! Bitcoin Discussion
I really have no issue with this. Satoshi (IIRC) intended for the blocksize limi…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 28, 2013, 07:48:43 PM |
|
|
|
Keeping Bitcoin Decentralized! Bitcoin Discussion
I have been around Bitcoin for awhile now and have been an investor for almost a…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 28, 2013, 01:41:37 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Blocksize Problem Video Bitcoin Discussion
Peter: Interesting! I wish you had told me about this project earlier. You have…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 28, 2013, 01:24:43 PM |
|
|
|
Improving the trustworthyness of PGP keys with Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
Thank you to the anonymous individual who stepped up to make this happen. I hope…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 28, 2013, 12:53:24 PM |
|
|
|
Improving the trustworthyness of PGP keys with Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
Why not kill two birds with one stone?
|
n/a | jdillon | April 24, 2013, 11:49:25 AM |
|
|
|
Is StrongCoin's 'hybrid wallet' a lie? (Or rather, are ALL hybrid wallet a lie?) Bitcoin Discussion
My understanding of a hybrid wallet is that this cannot happen.So... how did thi…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 24, 2013, 05:13:12 AM |
|
|
|
Improving the trustworthyness of PGP keys with Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
This sig was very clever:QuoteAKA Peter Todd1FCYd7j4CThTMzts78rh6iQJLBRGPW9fWvPG…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 24, 2013, 05:44:11 AM |
|
|
|
Reminder: zero-conf is not safe; $1000USD reward posted for replace-by-fee patch Development & Technical Discussion
#2 was my jdillon's original point, and the one I was supporting. But not in th…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 24, 2013, 05:31:54 AM |
|
|
|
Reminder: zero-conf is not safe; $500USD reward posted for replace-by-fee patch Development & Technical Discussion
So there are lots of reasons why people might not do this. And that may explain…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 23, 2013, 07:25:57 AM |
|
|
|
Reminder: zero-conf is not safe; $500USD reward posted for replace-by-fee patch Development & Technical Discussion
Ive always felt that some people on this forum live in a fantasy world and assum…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 19, 2013, 12:59:10 AM |
|
|
|
Reminder: zero-conf is not safe; $500USD reward posted for replace-by-fee patch Development & Technical Discussion
retep: To clarify the $500USD reward is meant to be for a proof-of-concept imple…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 18, 2013, 11:28:46 PM |
|
|
|
Whitelist Requests (Want out of here?) Beginners & Help
I posted an email to bitcoin-development offering a $500USD reward for a replace…
|
n/a | jdillon | April 18, 2013, 08:06:58 AM |
Pages:
Jump to: