| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Fallback double spend protection during forks Development & Technical Discussion
Crap, you're right, in the OKPAY case the first transaction took so long to get…
|
n/a | jevon | April 25, 2013, 11:12:05 AM |
|
|
|
Fallback double spend protection during forks Development & Technical Discussion
It was practically unavoidable because transaction had more than 6 confirms in t…
|
n/a | jevon | April 25, 2013, 10:24:32 AM |
|
|
|
Fallback double spend protection during forks Development & Technical Discussion
I think the OKPAY double spend during the fork could have been prevented if the…
|
n/a | jevon | April 25, 2013, 10:09:39 AM |
|
|
|
Handle much larger MH/s rigs : simply increase the nonce size Development & Technical Discussion
If the time to talk to the device is of the same order of magnitude as how long…
|
n/a | jevon | October 06, 2012, 07:22:27 AM |
|
|
|
Handle much larger MH/s rigs : simply increase the nonce size Development & Technical Discussion
If the time to talk to the device is of the same order of magnitude as how long…
|
n/a | jevon | October 06, 2012, 07:51:51 AM |
|
|
|
Handle much larger MH/s rigs : simply increase the nonce size Development & Technical Discussion
Any change to the block header is a hard fork upgrade, and should be avoided at…
|
n/a | jevon | October 06, 2012, 06:57:08 AM |
|
|
|
Blocking the time warp attack Development & Technical Discussion
I haven't considered if your newly proposed rule is sufficient yet or if it's ot…
|
n/a | jevon | October 03, 2012, 04:09:33 PM |
|
|
|
Blocking the time warp attack Development & Technical Discussion
ArtForz posted here how the timestamp constraints can be gamed to walk backwards…
|
n/a | jevon | October 01, 2012, 04:52:51 PM |
|
|
|
Blocking the time travel attack Development & Technical Discussion
It doesn't just require a simple majority, the chain must also be forked more th…
|
n/a | jevon | October 02, 2012, 11:51:46 AM |
|
|
|
Encrypted wallet.dat, lost password, any solutions? Bitcoin Technical Support
What type of error was it? Capitalization, missing character, extra character, t…
|
n/a | jevon | June 17, 2012, 06:44:25 PM |
|
|
|
My horrific realization - pruning is not enough Development & Technical Discussion
Arbitrarily small probabilistic micropayments are possible:https://en.bitcoin.it…
|
n/a | jevon | June 17, 2012, 06:01:13 PM |
|
|
|
[CRITICAL FIX] Bitcoin fork "No Forced TX Fee" v0.5.3.1 released Development & Technical Discussion
b) the ability to add a transaction fee to a transaction that you've received an…
|
n/a | jevon | June 17, 2012, 05:05:07 PM |
|
|
|
Defence against double spending, even 0-confirmation Development & Technical Discussion
Precisely because of the same logic etotheipi outlined escrow where both parties…
|
n/a | jevon | April 13, 2012, 02:26:37 PM |
|
|
|
Defence against double spending, even 0-confirmation Development & Technical Discussion
It is possible for people create non-fraudulent double-spends. A common case: i…
|
n/a | jevon | April 11, 2012, 10:19:54 AM |
|
|
|
Defence against double spending, even 0-confirmation Development & Technical Discussion
Here's an idea to take away the incentive to double spend. If a miner finds a do…
|
n/a | jevon | April 11, 2012, 09:53:09 AM |
|
|
|
Defence against double spending, even 0-confirmation Development & Technical Discussion
"Double spend = same input, different outputs."You would still need to reconside…
|
n/a | jevon | April 13, 2012, 09:49:14 AM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
Can you remind me how "the miner gets it automatically"? It's in "Defense again…
|
n/a | jevon | April 12, 2012, 02:44:32 PM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
I see three options for who should get the double spent amount:1. The first tran…
|
n/a | jevon | April 12, 2012, 02:01:08 PM |
|
|
|
Defence against double spending, even 0-confirmation Development & Technical Discussion
I misread - I thought you wanted to include it as secondary inputs to the coinba…
|
n/a | jevon | April 12, 2012, 10:08:41 AM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
Suppose there's a transaction for 100,000BTC and several blocks later a double s…
|
n/a | jevon | April 12, 2012, 12:59:22 PM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
Or, in other words, you'd need to be pretty sure that you've got a majority of m…
|
n/a | jevon | April 12, 2012, 12:10:55 PM |
|
|
|
Defence against double spending, even 0-confirmation Development & Technical Discussion
This is not correct. Old nodes will not accept a block whose coinbase has more t…
|
n/a | jevon | April 12, 2012, 09:48:08 AM |
|
|
|
Defence against double spending, even 0-confirmation Development & Technical Discussion
Interesting but likely impossible to implement. Old node (not just miners) woul…
|
n/a | jevon | April 12, 2012, 08:14:38 AM |
|
|
|
Defence against double spending, even 0-confirmation Development & Technical Discussion
Interesting but likely impossible to implement. Old node (not just miners) woul…
|
n/a | jevon | April 11, 2012, 10:24:47 AM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
If that is the one sent to the unknown person that you are calling "recipient",…
|
n/a | jevon | April 11, 2012, 01:22:36 AM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
How do you do the bolded part? And how do you know which is "first"?The first t…
|
n/a | jevon | April 11, 2012, 12:41:43 AM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
Then instead make it in the miner's interest to stay with the first transaction:…
|
n/a | jevon | April 10, 2012, 10:48:33 PM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
3. If you have two final, fee-paying transactions, keep/mine/relay the one with…
|
n/a | jevon | April 10, 2012, 09:04:18 PM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
Either way will work. Just make sure they can't do this, like with 4 inputs:0xff…
|
n/a | jevon | April 10, 2012, 10:05:00 AM |
|
|
|
TX replacement and nLockTime Development & Technical Discussion
DoSing entities would send themselves multiple versions of multiple transactions…
|
n/a | jevon | April 08, 2012, 01:17:45 PM |
|
|
|
Sustainable nanopayment idea: Probabilistic Payments Development & Technical Discussion
I think there's a simpler way that only needs standard transactions and works wi…
|
n/a | jevon | April 05, 2012, 10:02:39 AM |
|
|
|
Last person to post in this thread wins .01 btc Beginners & Help
How are you going to know when you get the last post?He has a last post detector…
|
n/a | jevon | April 05, 2012, 09:21:10 AM |
|
|
|
Newbies Hangout Beginners & Help
Hello
|
n/a | jevon | April 05, 2012, 09:02:37 AM |
|
|
|
Securely swapping bitcoins Beginners & Help
A standard transaction with two inputs and two outputs could do a secure swap. …
|
n/a | jevon | April 02, 2012, 04:55:15 PM |
|
|
|
Max BTC generated is limited to? Beginners & Help
Decades from now, if Bitcoin hasn't caught on enough by then to have significant…
|
n/a | jevon | April 02, 2012, 12:39:31 PM |
|
|
|
Blocks with no transactions and orphaned blocks Beginners & Help
Might be a sign of some miners trying to shun the blank blocks.
|
n/a | jevon | April 02, 2012, 11:26:07 AM |
Pages:
Jump to: