| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
Personally, I think the OP is definitely thinking on the right lines. Whether th…
|
n/a | JFC | December 23, 2016, 03:11:01 PM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
In Europe we have IBAN numbers for EUR account and it is not rememberable at all…
|
n/a | JFC | December 23, 2016, 03:03:14 PM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
Opening new levels of discussion to improve bitcoin is a great thing but I kind…
|
n/a | JFC | December 23, 2016, 02:49:14 PM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
In the future we will hopefully have confidential transactions as proposed by gm…
|
n/a | JFC | December 23, 2016, 02:38:31 PM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
Opening new levels of discussion to improve bitcoin is a great thing but I kind…
|
n/a | JFC | December 21, 2016, 12:32:12 PM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
Hi Danny,first let me give you triple thanks for your comments.First, because it…
|
n/a | JFC | December 21, 2016, 12:20:50 PM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
No, in my opinion that address can create collision address some day and can be…
|
n/a | JFC | December 21, 2016, 04:18:11 AM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
Not a good idea.I could go into technical stuff but let's save it for another da…
|
n/a | JFC | December 20, 2016, 12:48:30 PM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
There would be duplicatesCould you please elaborate?In two ways. First, there ar…
|
n/a | JFC | December 20, 2016, 10:26:06 AM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
Not gonna work, after blockchain reorganization (in the course of short chain fo…
|
n/a | JFC | December 19, 2016, 11:33:36 AM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
There would be duplicatesCould you please elaborate?
|
n/a | JFC | December 19, 2016, 08:18:44 AM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
The biggest problem IMO is that you can't use this format with an empty address.…
|
n/a | JFC | December 19, 2016, 06:37:21 AM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
Quote(Precondition: Your address exists as a single output in a transaction that…
|
n/a | JFC | December 19, 2016, 04:14:07 AM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
However, I suppose the fact that you have to get a transaction in the blockchain…
|
n/a | JFC | December 17, 2016, 04:12:57 PM |
|
|
|
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
From the perspective of the user interface, the bitcoin address format is IMHO o…
|
n/a | JFC | December 17, 2016, 02:48:25 PM |
|
|
|
What block size will be needed to support LN transactions at Visa volumes? Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteSure, such user will need to open new channels quite often. But another, mo…
|
n/a | JFC | December 13, 2016, 12:54:03 PM |
|
|
|
What block size will be needed to support LN transactions at Visa volumes? Development & Technical Discussion
More specifically: What kind of transactions would have to happen obligatorily i…
|
n/a | JFC | December 13, 2016, 12:30:58 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Tic-Tac Coopetition mining Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | JFC | December 12, 2016, 02:48:32 PM |
|
|
|
What block size will be needed to support LN transactions at Visa volumes? Development & Technical Discussion
According to https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Scalability "VISA handles on average aro…
|
n/a | JFC | December 12, 2016, 01:37:52 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Tic-Tac Coopetition mining Development & Technical Discussion
The rewards during this cooperation phase (fees and new coins) will be fairly di…
|
n/a | JFC | December 12, 2016, 12:48:17 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Tic-Tac Coopetition mining Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | JFC | December 12, 2016, 12:19:00 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Tic-Tac Coopetition mining Development & Technical Discussion
1) Tic state is one day long2) Tac state is ten years long3) aaaaaand each coinb…
|
n/a | JFC | December 10, 2016, 05:14:08 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Tic-Tac Coopetition mining Development & Technical Discussion
Except that if you reduce all miner's energy costs by 90%, they will all use the…
|
n/a | JFC | December 10, 2016, 04:22:11 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Tic-Tac Coopetition mining Development & Technical Discussion
Hi,I've had recently this idea for a more ecological and economical way of minin…
|
n/a | JFC | December 09, 2016, 04:31:37 AM |
Pages:
Jump to: