| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Why rely on a single hash function? Development & Technical Discussion
2. Perhaps there are other very valuable uses, but Bitcoin does have half a tril…
|
n/a | laminar_hash | May 19, 2022, 11:12:32 AM |
|
|
|
Why rely on a single hash function? Development & Technical Discussion
There is no such thing as producing a valid block hash with little computations,…
|
n/a | laminar_hash | May 18, 2022, 03:31:33 PM |
|
|
|
Why rely on a single hash function? Development & Technical Discussion
Also defeating (not weaken) SHA256 or any cryptography like that is quite valuab…
|
n/a | laminar_hash | May 18, 2022, 03:27:34 PM |
|
|
|
Why rely on a single hash function? Development & Technical Discussion
As my friend always said: "we can do everything, the question is: should we?". A…
|
n/a | laminar_hash | May 18, 2022, 03:17:05 PM |
|
|
|
Why rely on a single hash function? Development & Technical Discussion
First of all it depends on what "broken" means. For example we call SHA1 broken…
|
n/a | laminar_hash | May 18, 2022, 03:09:53 PM |
|
|
|
Why rely on a single hash function? Development & Technical Discussion
The crux idea is about pre-image resistance of SHA256 but a bigger issue would b…
|
n/a | laminar_hash | May 11, 2022, 01:18:55 PM |
|
|
|
Why rely on a single hash function? Development & Technical Discussion
Hmm... Doesn't the danger remain?Alright, so let's say we used SHA-256 for even…
|
n/a | laminar_hash | May 11, 2022, 01:13:14 PM |
|
|
|
Why rely on a single hash function? Development & Technical Discussion
Dear Bitcointalkers,I apologize if this question has been dealt with, but I have…
|
n/a | laminar_hash | May 11, 2022, 11:48:47 AM |
Pages:
Jump to: