It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
are there any actual stats on chain reorgs, by depth? Development & Technical Discussion
and the hashrate was a small fraction back around block 225K. Not sure, but I th…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 19, 2016, 05:53:44 AM | ||
Why the blockchain and mining are unnecessary Beginners & Help
If either of you had asked me in advance if the messaging hierarchy gave elevate…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 17, 2016, 04:10:36 PM | ||
Why the blockchain and mining are unnecessary Beginners & Help
How do I know when a transaction "has been accepted by a majority of the network…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 17, 2016, 11:57:41 AM | ||
Why the blockchain and mining are unnecessary Beginners & Help
Spend UTXO_A (mine) and create new unspent output UTXO_B (yours)...A few days ha…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 17, 2016, 04:22:02 AM | ||
Why the blockchain and mining are unnecessary Beginners & Help
So, I send you 25 BTC, wait for you to accept it and send me my physical item, t…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 16, 2016, 12:32:30 PM | ||
Why the blockchain and mining are unnecessary Beginners & Help
When someone attempts to double spend, it doesn't matter which happened first, a…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 16, 2016, 12:06:22 PM | ||
Poloniex DDOS! ain't nobody got time for that! DDOS(jam)-proof DEX alternatives Service Discussion (Altcoins)
Currently, the only exchange that I know of that is immune to a jamming attack i…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 15, 2016, 05:26:01 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Fault-tolerant is a good term I think. Perhaps that helps define its (possible)…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 15, 2016, 04:53:40 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
If I make a simple program to get a random number from 1 to 100, or base my prog…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 15, 2016, 04:50:37 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
if Ethereum is a distributed computing platformIt isn't; it's a replicated/redu…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 15, 2016, 04:19:14 AM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
It is certainly true that valuing the PoW expended by the miners is essential fo…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 15, 2016, 04:15:03 AM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
I think it could be possible for the reward to be other than "coins".There is no…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 14, 2016, 09:03:42 AM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
The confirmation times are sped up by the fact that most blocks only require low…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 14, 2016, 05:45:59 AM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
The confirmation times are sped up by the fact that most blocks only require low…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 14, 2016, 05:31:36 AM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
I concluded that this system has a similar security model to plain PoS, since id…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 14, 2016, 05:16:09 AM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
The question of incentive becomes more of an issue should the best minter not mi…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 14, 2016, 04:56:49 AM | ||
The 0% PoS attack - possible? Altcoin Discussion
Why isn't this possible in a PoS system with bonded stake?1. Short the coin2. Pa…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 14, 2016, 04:38:25 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
What you have provided is not a proof at all. We can go into meaningless and lon…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 14, 2016, 04:18:01 AM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
Indeed - the approach that CIYAM uses is known as a "hash chain" (which function…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 14, 2016, 04:15:53 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
This is an very informal proof, because I wanted it to be as readable as possibl…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 13, 2016, 02:49:00 PM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
As a simplistic idea imagine that a block reward only occurs every X blocks but…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 13, 2016, 02:02:38 PM | ||
Luke Jr's HARDFORK proposal debunked Development & Technical Discussion
Halving the difficulty in a hard fork is not a good idea in general, though; tha…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 11, 2016, 04:49:01 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
Satoshi did not solve the Byzantine Generals problem, and Bitcoin is failing bec…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 11, 2016, 03:59:39 AM | ||
Luke Jr's HARDFORK proposal debunked Development & Technical Discussion
The way blocks are solved is probabilistic and it's actually quite simple:1. The…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 05:57:41 PM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
Nodes take the first block they receive or which ever block is winning in votes…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 05:22:26 PM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
You can definitely make your local node do that though the security comes from t…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 12:26:07 PM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
Rewriting history of an account can only be done by the account owner themself,…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 12:20:43 PM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
Rewriting history of an account can only be done by the account owner themself,…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 11:59:24 AM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
Since putting a block in an accounts's chain requires it to be signed by the acc…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 11:34:31 AM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
Is this different than with bitcoin?To short bitcoin you need an investment that…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 11:20:51 AM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
voting like this would destroy this value.Why is that a problem? Take out a shor…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 11:05:48 AM | ||
Decentralized margin trading Altcoin Discussion
Whitepaper?
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 09:42:15 AM | ||
POLL - which coins are scams as defined in the OP? Altcoin Discussion
If you want an intelligent argument*, you're welcome to contribute here: https:/…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 09:23:58 AM | ||
POLL - which coins are scams as defined in the OP? Altcoin Discussion
I thought you had work to do? If you want an intelligent argument*, you're welco…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 09:15:52 AM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
If you pay nothing do not spend energy for security - you do not have the securi…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 10, 2016, 03:20:44 AM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
Another point I think needs addressing is the votes themselves. Are they transac…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 09, 2016, 11:03:52 AM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
I'll have to think about how to quantify the agreement rate, to me it seemed pre…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 09, 2016, 10:53:11 AM | ||
Luke Jr's HARDFORK proposal debunked Development & Technical Discussion
PSCall E(i) the expected number of rounds of this game assuming that we got to r…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 09, 2016, 08:00:43 AM | ||
The timely confirmation incentive in a system with no mining rewards Development & Technical Discussion
A consensus design which doesn't offer a mining reward is attractive in theory,…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 09, 2016, 06:28:59 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
I don't believe the tragedy of the commons argument is a valid one because Bitco…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 09, 2016, 04:46:11 AM | ||
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
A whitepaper has been arranged for viewing https://docs.google.com/document/d/13…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 09, 2016, 04:33:00 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
Am I incorrect in what I wrote here about the mindset of Bitcoiners and speculat…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 08, 2016, 05:32:44 PM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Actually I did briefly some months ago state that I thought the honest miners co…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 08, 2016, 12:33:32 PM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
I am not hilarious. I guarantee you are wrong. If you could simply wrap your min…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 08, 2016, 09:20:16 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Sorry you just don't comprehend. Will I receive your apology when you later real…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 08, 2016, 08:53:29 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Profitable PoW just seems harder to attack by irrational actors than unprofitabl…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 08, 2016, 08:48:03 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Fee payment can be included as one of the transaction outputs should necessity a…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 08, 2016, 06:22:53 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Haha, I already knew that problem would exist in their system at 0 adoption, but…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 08, 2016, 05:09:47 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
but if Iota requires them to work at all, is this an admission the system just…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 08, 2016, 04:58:11 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Profitable PoW just seems harder to attack by irrational actors than unprofitabl…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 08, 2016, 04:16:30 AM | ||
Why Proof of Burn cannot work cleanly in practice Altcoin Discussion
You have to burn within the last 50 blocks, you cannot burn more recently than t…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 07, 2016, 02:39:04 PM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Certainly, no reasonable sized ANN can compute a memory-hard function.This requi…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 07, 2016, 01:51:38 PM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Decentralized poker would be infested with bots and colluders. Even online casin…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 07, 2016, 06:00:25 AM | ||
Is Ethereum heading to centralization? Altcoin Discussion
Will they add checkpoints? That'll give you a very definite answer. If they don'…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 07, 2016, 04:50:19 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
I'd estimate, that 'working' DAPPs can only be nichy ones w/o any real risk expo…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 07, 2016, 04:34:55 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
I will not reply to you again in this thread on this topic. This is a waste of m…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 06, 2016, 10:02:20 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
That is only true if there is no cost to not mining on the longest chain. Which…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 06, 2016, 09:40:53 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
That is only true if there is no cost to not mining on the longest chain. Which…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 06, 2016, 08:26:33 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
You also seem to be caught up on assuming that no one has an incentive to do the…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 06, 2016, 08:17:44 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
You don't have to pay them money in order to pay them. Haven't you ever heard o…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 06, 2016, 07:34:00 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
That s another issue. I was thinking about better sharing incentives between min…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 06, 2016, 06:55:40 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
New Casper concept contains an artificial incentive cap and a wait time ( not se…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 06, 2016, 06:41:46 AM | ||
Why all centralized coins fail Altcoin Discussion
It's a shame nobody has thought of a way to stop pow mining eventually always be…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 06, 2016, 06:28:07 AM | ||
[ETH] Possible miner attack angle? Altcoin Discussion
Anybody know if this attack is possible in ethereum?1. Miner creates a contract…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 05, 2016, 06:36:53 PM | ||
[ETH] Possible miner attack angle? Altcoin Discussion
Anybody know if this attack is possible in ethereum?1. Miner creates a contract…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 05, 2016, 05:22:43 PM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
That would be a 51% attack.Ah, right. I didn't notice that you emphasized on ach…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 05, 2016, 11:36:08 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
ASIC speed grows in bursts. Eventually one of the bursts will allow to rewrite t…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 05, 2016, 10:26:39 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
PoS is mining. It's cpu-mining, not much different than what satoshi designed f…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 05, 2016, 09:47:57 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
If you remove the miners, you are investing in nothing. That is PoS in a nutshel…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 05, 2016, 08:52:14 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
The miners have the most skin-in-the-game and can therefore be trusted to behave…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 04, 2016, 07:06:17 PM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
That's when you find out that you were talking to the same guy, and you bought t…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 04, 2016, 06:46:17 PM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
This is plainly ridiculous. How much do you sell an empty cardboard box for whic…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 04, 2016, 09:08:40 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Why should it? It's obvious to the seller that the wallet is worthless when it c…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 04, 2016, 07:09:24 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
On the street? Depends how much you need the money, doesn't it?I mean that the o…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 04, 2016, 06:54:50 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Perhaps, perhaps not. What is the use of an old password? Zero, I'd say.So if so…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 04, 2016, 06:43:10 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
You're assuming that regular people need to know the inner workings of blockchai…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 04, 2016, 05:19:48 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
The problem with using someone else's privkeys is that they can still have the s…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 04, 2016, 04:22:43 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Almost all attacks see the main fork being orphaned. Thank you for stating that,…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 05:44:49 PM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
They are valid on the main fork.Even in the case of a very swift attack, as it w…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 11:49:47 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
He will need to censor also all transactions that depend on transactions sending…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 11:29:40 AM | ||
Study Suggests Bitcoin Needs Major Changes to Scale UP Development & Technical Discussion
I told you several times in the past. I eschew repeating myself. I have 10,000 p…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 11:03:13 AM | ||
Study Suggests Bitcoin Needs Major Changes to Scale UP Development & Technical Discussion
It is not a problem. You asked the wrong question.The only way for it not to be…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 10:48:55 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
He can't just sit and produce blocks forever. In order to be able to produce blo…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 10:46:19 AM | ||
Study Suggests Bitcoin Needs Major Changes to Scale UP Development & Technical Discussion
Well that is if you assume the only possible overriding motivation for the strat…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 10:10:26 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
And then the partition that has accepted the transfer of gas from a partition th…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 09:38:55 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
I already explained that cross-partition spending is possible (i.e. won't destro…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 09:08:16 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Even that wouldn't work because as you pointed out, the entity running the scrip…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 08:38:11 AM | ||
Study Suggests Bitcoin Needs Major Changes to Scale UP Development & Technical Discussion
Well that is if you assume the only possible overriding motivation for the strat…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 08:35:31 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
You got it with your edit.Of course the virtual machine assumes they are atomic…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 06:29:43 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
That doesn't matter (or actually it makes the problem I explained more obvious).…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 06:21:42 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Which I subsequently elaborated on today. The point about gas is why it is impos…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 06:17:18 AM | ||
The Ethereum Paradox Altcoin Discussion
Casper has much bigger problems than just the sharding - even if you remove all…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 04:42:52 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Nxt has been running over 2 years and you are now soapboxing the same arguments…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 03, 2016, 04:12:31 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Kinda ironic that Proof of Anti-stake may workthe idea is, that user destroys it…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 02, 2016, 08:27:06 AM | ||
DASH scam exposed at the Satoshi Roundtable retreat! Altcoin Discussion
/facepalm because anon solves a problem right? A war over the war over anon send…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 02, 2016, 03:03:47 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Do you want objective analysis, or just unthinking agreement to whatever you pos…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 01, 2016, 12:18:01 PM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
However, an equally ridiculous set of assumptions can be used to take over a PoW…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 01, 2016, 12:02:39 PM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
You have proven nothing. There is no market for formerly large stakeholding keys…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 01, 2016, 11:40:15 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
If you can describe one which doesn't involve something related to a checkpoint,…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 01, 2016, 11:50:18 AM | ||
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
I believe I covered the re-org depth mitigation in the OP? It doesn't help for t…
|
n/a | monsterer | March 01, 2016, 11:34:08 AM |