It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
secp256k1 library in pure assembly Development & Technical Discussion
Alright.There's one other thing to address: in the secp256k1_fe_mul (or somethin…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | December 28, 2022, 10:19:38 AM | ||
secp256k1 library in pure assembly Development & Technical Discussion
But since I use secp256k1 curve only for testing and research I do no care much…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | December 26, 2022, 09:52:18 AM | ||
BIP 322 draft design and improvement thread Development & Technical Discussion
It is just an invention, a bad one: Programmable digital signature. There was no…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | August 10, 2022, 03:13:55 PM | ||
BIP 322 draft design and improvement thread Development & Technical Discussion
The Bitcoin script system *is* a (programmable) digital signature scheme on its…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | August 10, 2022, 01:09:35 PM | ||
Why does secp256k1_fe_set_int enforce a <= 0x7FFF? Development & Technical Discussion
I'm not sure about papers. Some of the low-level field arithmetic in libsecp256k…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 25, 2022, 12:39:48 PM | ||
Why does secp256k1_fe_set_int enforce a <= 0x7FFF? Development & Technical Discussion
Oh, I had missed part of the question. I don't recall why the documentation limi…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 23, 2022, 04:53:54 PM | ||
Why does secp256k1_fe_set_int enforce a <= 0x7FFF? Development & Technical Discussion
Interesting question!The reason for the restriction is simply to keep secp256k1_…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 23, 2022, 10:43:07 AM | ||
CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world Development & Technical Discussion
Code:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA512Hello all,this is to announce…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 29, 2019, 08:31:17 PM | ||
Segregated Witness legal flaw and its probable technical solutions Development & Technical Discussion
Yes @Pietre, I do agree, several problems will be fixed but one problem will be…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | June 29, 2017, 03:33:06 PM | ||
Segregated Witness legal flaw and its probable technical solutions Development & Technical Discussion
Let's take a moment and chew it: Current light clients can't check UTXO and prev…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | June 29, 2017, 12:17:07 PM | ||
Segregated Witness legal flaw and its probable technical solutions Development & Technical Discussion
A full node is capable to handle temporary chain splits and to choose the right…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | June 28, 2017, 04:55:20 PM | ||
Segregated Witness legal flaw and its probable technical solutions Development & Technical Discussion
Validating nodes need to download and verify the signatures. This is true now, a…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | June 28, 2017, 03:28:45 PM | ||
The case for moving from a 160 bit to a 256 bit Bitcoin address Development & Technical Discussion
In order to get collision with a 40% chance on a set of 2 ^ 80 addresses, you ne…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | June 23, 2017, 07:28:00 PM | ||
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
From the point of view of old clients, segwit adds one coinbase output that cont…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | March 16, 2016, 08:27:36 AM | ||
Elements Project testnet sidechain alpha released Development & Technical Discussion
Running with -testnet is default. You can run with -notestnet, but this will res…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | June 09, 2015, 06:47:37 AM | ||
JSONRPC - not working with Bitcoin - others are 100% working Bitcoin Technical Support
Hard to say without seeing the script...
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | February 22, 2015, 12:20:50 PM | ||
BIP 66 status (miners' votes) Development & Technical Discussion
See any of these graphs (different time ranges):http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver-2k.pn…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | February 22, 2015, 01:00:09 AM | ||
Is bitcoin v0.10's new libsecp256k1 safe & without mathematical backdoors? Development & Technical Discussion
Code:void print_number(double x) { double y = x; int c = 0; if (y < 0.0…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | February 05, 2015, 01:48:35 AM | ||
Is bitcoin v0.10's new libsecp256k1 safe & without mathematical backdoors? Development & Technical Discussion
However, libsecp256k1 takes its nonce as input to its API, and from that point o…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | January 28, 2015, 10:26:53 PM | ||
Is bitcoin v0.10's new libsecp256k1 safe & without mathematical backdoors? Development & Technical Discussion
Hi colinistheman,it's very good that people have concerns about the security of…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | January 28, 2015, 10:15:54 PM | ||
Remove block validations in order to speed up initial sync from known client Development & Technical Discussion
-checklevel only changes the level of consistency checks done at startup, it doe…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | January 26, 2015, 12:51:05 AM | ||
Block size Development & Technical Discussion
Quote"Core developers" (whoever that creatures are) cannot do anything with the…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | January 21, 2015, 02:16:07 PM | ||
0x00 prefix for R and S values in DER signature Development & Technical Discussion
It's a DER requirement to prefix a 0x00 byte to an encoded integer if the intege…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | November 26, 2014, 06:42:39 PM | ||
BIP proposal: Canonical Deterministic Signatures Development & Technical Discussion
BIP 62 already contains a proposal to make S values deterministic (by making it…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | August 07, 2014, 08:45:58 AM | ||
ECDSA Signatures allow recovery of the public key Development & Technical Discussion
Can anyone think of any reason why the Bitcoin client requires the user provide…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 12, 2014, 10:41:10 AM | ||
Non-canonical signatures: looking for detectives Development & Technical Discussion
Do you remember which version started enforcing those rules?v0.8.0
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | December 15, 2013, 07:49:30 AM | ||
strip the reference client to a border router Development & Technical Discussion
Can we just embed the relevant part of OpenSSL to the code, so we don't need to…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | October 28, 2013, 05:32:20 AM | ||
bip32 wallet structure for electrum Electrum
Looks good to me.
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | August 15, 2013, 06:05:41 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
So if someone gives me an extended public key, I can generate public keys to add…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 28, 2013, 11:14:18 AM | ||
Buggy CVE-2013-4627 patch, open new vectors of attack Development & Technical Discussion
The reason for mapRelay (i.e., storing relayed data in wire format, rather than…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 19, 2013, 05:47:55 PM | ||
New Attack Vector Development & Technical Discussion
it makes it nearly impossible to create a alternative client, when the "standard…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 19, 2013, 12:05:55 PM | ||
New Attack Vector Development & Technical Discussion
The standard was using DER-encoded signatures, we're not making anything up - we…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 17, 2013, 11:23:40 AM | ||
New Attack Vector Development & Technical Discussion
@kokjo: mind sharing the code how to embed the OpenSSL-created signature into a…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 17, 2013, 10:49:46 AM | ||
New Attack Vector Development & Technical Discussion
fix bitcoin, go make a standard and stick to it.No offence, but all this work is…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 17, 2013, 10:38:10 AM | ||
I Need Version 0.3.25.1-beta of the Bitcoin software Development & Technical Discussion
Or they added a tag of their own.
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 14, 2013, 02:10:25 PM | ||
proposal: delete blocks older than 1000 Development & Technical Discussion
Deleting old blocks is perfectly possible - this was a design goal when the 0.8…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 14, 2013, 02:08:00 PM | ||
Trying to implement BIP 0032, having some trouble. Development & Technical Discussion
If you start from an extended private key, and private derivation is used (the h…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 14, 2013, 02:04:17 PM | ||
ECDsa Verification Speed Development & Technical Discussion
It looks like the whole thing is inverted and the return value should be 0 == go…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | July 12, 2013, 06:49:27 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Peter, can BIP32 be changed to a status of Final on the wiki now?I've made it 'A…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | June 22, 2013, 11:44:28 AM | ||
Bitcoin-Qt / bitcoind 0.8.2 (final) available Bitcoin Discussion
Still says beta though Every Bitcoin version ever released has been beta (inten…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 30, 2013, 12:32:46 AM | ||
Bitcoin-Qt / bitcoind 0.8.2 (final) available Bitcoin Discussion
Ugh I hate the mandatory downloads..There is nothing mandatory here.
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 29, 2013, 04:56:30 PM | ||
Extremely high bitcoind getblocktemplate latency Development & Technical Discussion
0.8.2rc2 and above have a patch that makes getblocktemplate significantly faster…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 27, 2013, 05:40:43 PM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
I completely disagree.Yes, Bitcoin is exactly the same as other currencies in th…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 27, 2013, 05:38:13 PM | ||
Bitcoin client with I2P patch Development & Technical Discussion
If I understand correctly you talking about PROTOCOL_VERSION constant in version…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 27, 2013, 02:17:58 PM | ||
Bitcoin client with I2P patch Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think there's a need to use a service flag for this. We could just bump…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 27, 2013, 10:07:03 AM | ||
RFC: Comment field in Transactions Development & Technical Discussion
I agree with the idea. Any progress made on this?The only data that belongs in (…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 26, 2013, 11:31:15 PM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin at its core is not an accounting system, it is a currency. It implements…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 26, 2013, 07:58:59 PM | ||
Can a transaction be included in multiple blocks? Development & Technical Discussion
Can a miner include a transaction in a block, if that transaction has already be…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 26, 2013, 04:26:56 PM | ||
can't find some transaction in my bitcoind Development & Technical Discussion
Nope but by default "getrawtransaction" will not allow you to access tx's that d…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 26, 2013, 01:16:40 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Now Peter, where are those test vectors!? Have a look
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 25, 2013, 05:32:19 PM | ||
Bug in the official bitcoind? Development & Technical Discussion
The genesis block's output is not actually part of the transaction database, as…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 25, 2013, 05:30:37 PM | ||
Does list transsaction store the lists of transactions or the other way? Development & Technical Discussion
Neither.It queries the wallet, not the blockchain. The wallet contains a list of…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 22, 2013, 10:49:24 PM | ||
0.8.2rc1 ready for testing Development & Technical Discussion
If I leave the default settings (
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 22, 2013, 10:47:29 PM | ||
Making a Backup Copy of the Blockchain created by Bitcoin-QT Client Development & Technical Discussion
But now in Bitcoin-QT client 0.8.1, I'm not sure anymore what exact files are ne…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 22, 2013, 10:46:09 PM | ||
Who is Satoshi - but more importantly how would we know? Development & Technical Discussion
I meant why is it this way? Is it from the beginning or did something happen?It'…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 15, 2013, 04:51:11 PM | ||
Who is Satoshi - but more importantly how would we know? Development & Technical Discussion
Do you have a link I can read about it?Any version of bitcoind/bitcoin-qt's sour…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 15, 2013, 04:27:35 PM | ||
Who is Satoshi - but more importantly how would we know? Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin-qt doesn't allow such spending.This sounds like it's a limitation of the…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 15, 2013, 03:12:43 PM | ||
A bit of criticism on how the bitcoin client does it Development & Technical Discussion
Oh, I think I see your confusion.The only way to request blocks is using getdata…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 15, 2013, 07:23:41 AM | ||
A bit of criticism on how the bitcoin client does it Development & Technical Discussion
But what I wanted to achieve was downloading a block's payload in fragments (fro…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 15, 2013, 07:19:26 AM | ||
A bit of criticism on how the bitcoin client does it Development & Technical Discussion
But if I make a long bloom filter, then it should never match and so I should be…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 15, 2013, 07:13:50 AM | ||
A bit of criticism on how the bitcoin client does it Development & Technical Discussion
I have been looking at BIT37 and it seems that "merkleblock" is exactly what I n…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 15, 2013, 03:53:18 AM | ||
A bit of criticism on how the bitcoin client does it Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteWhat protocol is used to actually fetch blocks is pretty much orthogonal to…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 13, 2013, 03:31:48 PM | ||
A bit of criticism on how the bitcoin client does it Development & Technical Discussion
Why to ask 500 blocks back?It doesn't, as far as I know. It asks for "up 500 blo…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 13, 2013, 03:22:30 PM | ||
A bit of criticism on how the bitcoin client does it Development & Technical Discussion
1.Maybe I have not verified it well enough, but I have an impression that the or…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 13, 2013, 02:49:39 PM | ||
how does blockchain.info get the originating IP? Service Discussion
They don't know the originating IP; only the IP that first relayed it to them.
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 12, 2013, 04:29:54 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
1. Can we reserve more than one bit of the number i for different kind of deriva…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 12, 2013, 01:38:13 PM | ||
Initial replace-by-fee implementation is now available on testnet Development & Technical Discussion
I'm in the middle about this.One the one hand, I do understand the reason for a…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 12, 2013, 06:02:24 AM | ||
[BOUNTY: 2.0 BTC] [CLAIMED] Message Signing in Armory Armory
Just as a FYI, the C secp256k1 library I'm writing has support for creating reco…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 12, 2013, 04:47:02 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
I still haven't seen a compelling argument for being able to change chaincode in…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 12, 2013, 04:41:27 AM | ||
0.8.2rc1 ready for testing Development & Technical Discussion
When I start it up there is a message that says not to be used for mining. Can s…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 10, 2013, 06:31:31 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
- get the basescript with GetCScript(id)Where does the CScript from if you don't…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 10, 2013, 06:30:41 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
I imagined constructing multisig addresses of a set of (potentially completely i…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 10, 2013, 08:37:29 AM | ||
Concerns regarding deterministic wallet Development & Technical Discussion
Consider that the entire bitcoin network, over the course of the last 4.5 years,…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 09, 2013, 06:23:46 PM | ||
Concerns regarding deterministic wallet Development & Technical Discussion
If an attacker needs to guess a key, there is nothing to worry about. The keyspa…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 09, 2013, 06:05:55 PM | ||
Bootstrapping the pruned blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
The validity of bootstrap can easily be checked by checking the hash (which has…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 08, 2013, 06:07:32 PM | ||
Bootstrapping the pruned blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin - at least as implemented by the reference client today - is a zero-trus…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 08, 2013, 06:00:59 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
The reason for specifying that I_L >= n isn't allowed is indeed to guarantee uni…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 08, 2013, 05:26:04 PM | ||
Listunspent error Development & Technical Discussion
Listunspent fetches from the wallet, not from the (global) UTXO set.
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 03, 2013, 07:14:35 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Hey iddo & thanke,I love how thoroughly you've been discussing this, though I mu…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | May 03, 2013, 12:10:13 PM | ||
Building headless Bitcoin and Bitcoin-qt on Windows Development & Technical Discussion
Feel free to submit a pull request to replace build-msw.txt with this!
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 29, 2013, 09:53:29 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
@iddo: have a look at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=102349.0
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 23, 2013, 03:04:06 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
I still don't see how exactly it could be that "A creates a new K'par" and follo…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 23, 2013, 05:00:18 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
I don't want to specify how wallet software should work.OK, you do not want to s…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 22, 2013, 10:58:53 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
I don't want to specify how wallet software should work.
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 22, 2013, 10:20:40 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Keys generated within a single sub account might also use any random index.That'…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 22, 2013, 09:45:41 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
I still believe that for the default wallet layout (subaccounts at level 1 and l…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 22, 2013, 08:02:24 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
If K_i = (i*c_par)*K_par then you get the same phenomenon, right? The difference…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 22, 2013, 06:57:23 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Why does constant time public derivation give security against timing attacks? I…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 22, 2013, 06:54:50 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think storing the maximal branching inside the serialized format is the…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 22, 2013, 06:46:44 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
It is not less secure, as you still need to solve the ECDLP to find I_L from I_L…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 22, 2013, 04:44:08 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Pieter: what's the difference between what you just posted and what iddo posted?…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 21, 2013, 06:21:38 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
With the additive variant, don't you get I_L*G from parent and a child pubkeys,…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 21, 2013, 05:58:15 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
I suggest to set and serialize maximum i for each extended key. Such serialized…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 17, 2013, 12:41:58 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Maybe I'm overlooking something and should read the code.. but how does modifyin…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 17, 2013, 09:47:08 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
It doesn't complicate implementation because I consider it a trivial change. It…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 17, 2013, 09:14:17 AM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Countering the above cited comment: what do we gain by having ci depend on Kpar?…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 17, 2013, 07:03:52 AM | ||
Who is creating non-DER signatures? Development & Technical Discussion
Some old versions of bitcoinjs and Armory are known to have produced non-DER sig…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 17, 2013, 05:15:08 AM | ||
Who is creating non-DER signatures? Development & Technical Discussion
So bitcoinjs can do this? I thought we looked at it before and ruled that out. M…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 16, 2013, 02:21:35 PM | ||
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
Hello all,I've made some changes to BIP32 to deal with the issue of revealing a…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 16, 2013, 02:18:29 PM | ||
Bitcoin clients should have a MESSAGE option ! Development & Technical Discussion
These issues make me think that the place for messages is in a payment protocol…
|
n/a | Pieter Wuille | April 14, 2013, 12:49:00 PM |