| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Pondering a Highly Secure Deterministic Brainwallet Development & Technical Discussion
I wanted to add the following notes to this discussion if you find them relevant…
|
n/a | plaprade | December 01, 2013, 09:24:49 AM |
|
|
|
Time for another testnet reset? Development & Technical Discussion
I just wasted 20 minutes of my time reading through this thread without noticing…
|
n/a | plaprade | October 18, 2013, 09:24:15 AM |
|
|
|
Isn't the output of SHA256 *slightly* too big to use for a private key? Development & Technical Discussion
If the output of the SHA256 is greater than n it will just "wrap around" and wor…
|
n/a | plaprade | October 09, 2013, 02:14:35 PM |
|
|
|
Isn't the output of SHA256 *slightly* too big to use for a private key? Development & Technical Discussion
If the order of the elliptic curve in Bitcoin is some number slightly less than…
|
n/a | plaprade | October 09, 2013, 02:08:12 PM |
|
|
|
Deterministic Usage of DSA and ECDSA Digital Signature Algorithms (RFC 6979) Development & Technical Discussion
I'd like to contribute some test vectors of my own. The test vectors are fully c…
|
n/a | plaprade | October 08, 2013, 12:36:45 PM |
|
|
|
Deterministic Usage of DSA and ECDSA Digital Signature Algorithms (RFC 6979) Development & Technical Discussion
This will be changed to the alternative I described.Thanks! I'll update my code…
|
n/a | plaprade | October 07, 2013, 05:49:15 PM |
|
|
|
Deterministic Usage of DSA and ECDSA Digital Signature Algorithms (RFC 6979) Development & Technical Discussion
I noticed that the problem came from the parity of 'S'. The 'S' component is odd…
|
n/a | plaprade | October 07, 2013, 04:16:10 PM |
|
|
|
Deterministic Usage of DSA and ECDSA Digital Signature Algorithms (RFC 6979) Development & Technical Discussion
Code:# Test Vectors for RFC 6979 ECDSA, secp256k1, SHA-256# (private key, messag…
|
n/a | plaprade | October 07, 2013, 02:51:20 PM |
|
|
|
BIP0032 HD Wallet private key derivation incorrect? Development & Technical Discussion
The motivation there is that the ECC homomorphism based public derivation has th…
|
n/a | plaprade | September 11, 2013, 05:22:51 AM |
|
|
|
BIP0032 HD Wallet private key derivation incorrect? Development & Technical Discussion
ki = IL + kpar (mod n).I'm independently implementing BIP32 in Haskell on a priv…
|
n/a | plaprade | September 08, 2013, 06:58:38 PM |
|
|
|
BIP0032 HD Wallet private key derivation incorrect? Development & Technical Discussion
For both CKD functions, it is okay for IL to be 0. My bad. IL can be equal to 0…
|
n/a | plaprade | September 09, 2013, 03:38:42 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Businesses and Developers, Let's Get Started! Beginners & Help
Hi There,I'm developing libraries to increase Bitcoin support in Haskell. My git…
|
n/a | plaprade | August 11, 2013, 01:25:20 PM |
Pages:
Jump to: