It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
What we can do to confirm transactions faster? Development & Technical Discussion
> Sorry for bumping this, but was this ignored or missed?This is not Redditthe f…
|
n/a | Q? | February 25, 2017, 08:05:48 AM | ||
What we can do to confirm transactions faster? Development & Technical Discussion
Currently not all blocks are full, many are still empty or only partially full.…
|
n/a | Q? | February 25, 2017, 04:05:18 AM | ||
blockchain spam Bitcoin Discussion
bitcoin to increase block size so it would be even easier for them to ddos the…
|
n/a | Q? | February 25, 2017, 03:47:48 AM | ||
What we can do to confirm transactions faster? Development & Technical Discussion
Currently not all blocks are full, many are still empty or only partially full.…
|
n/a | Q? | February 23, 2017, 10:22:45 AM | ||
Why not "Just" increase the block size? Bitcoin Discussion
I have been reading more about "Sighash" that was mentioned above and I am start…
|
n/a | Q? | February 22, 2017, 12:56:26 PM | ||
Why not "Just" increase the block size? Bitcoin Discussion
There was such a thing: https://github.com/jgarzik/bips/blob/87aacb6a58d3c63a5dd…
|
n/a | Q? | February 22, 2017, 12:49:54 PM | ||
Why not "Just" increase the block size? Bitcoin Discussion
Well one reason would be, that it would sabotage Blockstream, because they want…
|
n/a | Q? | February 22, 2017, 11:52:37 AM | ||
Why not "Just" increase the block size? Bitcoin Discussion
is there any valid argument against only increasing the block size?what i mean i…
|
n/a | Q? | February 22, 2017, 11:09:55 AM | ||
Does SegWit even increase the block size? Bitcoin Discussion
Adding an extra 3MB for signatures onlyCare to elaborate how? or at least give m…
|
n/a | Q? | February 07, 2017, 06:03:36 AM | ||
Does SegWit even increase the block size? Bitcoin Discussion
I am very curious to know "if" Segregated Witness is going to increase block siz…
|
n/a | Q? | February 07, 2017, 05:52:35 AM | ||
bitcoinfees.21.co is doing more harm than good. Service Discussion
I think you are blaming the messenger. Even if the number of market-rate-fee pay…
|
n/a | Q? | February 07, 2017, 05:45:31 AM | ||
bitcoinfees.21.co is doing more harm than good. Service Discussion
@DannyHamiltonOk, it kinda makes sense about not decreasing the fees. i say kind…
|
n/a | Q? | February 05, 2017, 11:53:58 AM | ||
Why is fee still high (6000 unconfirmed transactions) Bitcoin Discussion
Just offer less, it will likely get accepted by some miner pretty quickly. i dou…
|
n/a | Q? | February 05, 2017, 10:30:41 AM | ||
bitcoinfees.21.co is doing more harm than good. Service Discussion
http://bitcoinfees.21.co/ shows us the amount of fee that we are supposed to pay…
|
n/a | Q? | February 05, 2017, 10:23:57 AM | ||
Why is fee still high (6000 unconfirmed transactions) Bitcoin Discussion
mempool is practically empty now with 6600 https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-t…
|
n/a | Q? | February 05, 2017, 10:08:47 AM |