| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Not sure why - I'd love to explain anything and repost my replies as needed.
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | July 13, 2018, 10:21:16 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Ix,I believe lost keys is a very serious problem which must be addressed.…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 23, 2018, 10:35:47 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,Isn't it also just an opportunity cost in PoW as well? If a miner dev…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 17, 2018, 03:56:42 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello D5000,Proof of burn works approximately this way: participants can destroy…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 17, 2018, 03:33:58 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Shelby,There’s two ways to attack the liveness threshold: a) don’t send ap…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 17, 2018, 12:44:12 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Shelby,An attacker's attack chain, in addition to beating the protocol rul…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 17, 2018, 12:28:02 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,IMO, the 0% attack is more dangerous than just the not responding att…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 16, 2018, 06:46:01 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Shelby,Note I have offered @shunsaitakahashi to collaborate with me on my…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 16, 2018, 06:41:57 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Shelby,The maximum defense against any attack in a stake based system can…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 16, 2018, 01:37:41 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Altcoin Discussion
This thread has the ongoing discussion https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 15, 2018, 10:41:40 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Shelby,I found a flaw in your design of the slots which enables the 50+% t…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 14, 2018, 04:48:40 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,... the punishment incurred by abusers of the signing processes is st…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 14, 2018, 03:52:07 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Shelby,So then the only vulnerabilities that remain are the long-range att…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 14, 2018, 03:48:40 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello D5000,If 50% of the state becomes non-responding, then the chain can be st…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 11, 2018, 02:56:08 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Shelby,Since you expect 50+% of the stake to be stable running on the clou…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 11, 2018, 11:40:41 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello All,Just updated the paper to include (hopefully) better description and i…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 11, 2018, 10:41:34 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello,Article: https://medium.com/@shunsai.takahashi/proof-of-approval-a-better-…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 17, 2018, 10:52:02 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello D5000,Thus if the above is correct, then we can only claim PoA is less per…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 10, 2018, 05:26:05 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo and Shelby,So thinking it through now, the 50+% (aka 50%+1) threshol…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 10, 2018, 04:27:46 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello All,Sorry for being out for a couple of days. I attempted to write a bette…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 10, 2018, 03:50:39 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,I have some ideas for you which might help your NaS problem. I develo…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 06, 2018, 03:05:06 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo and @anonymint,I must admit that language and writing have never bee…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 06, 2018, 02:40:32 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo and @anonymint,Remember that because you slash (delete) votes for du…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 04, 2018, 04:58:02 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo and @anonymint,The 50%+1 of honest stakeholders are divided to vote…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 04, 2018, 04:27:19 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Traxo, My apologies - yes discussion can get confusion as I did get confused wit…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 04, 2018, 04:00:37 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo,IOW, single block proposals per slot are a semi-centralized design.P…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 04, 2018, 03:04:04 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,Won't this decrease the overall network participation rate, as accide…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 04, 2018, 01:29:30 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,One possible solution can be to temporarily blacklist the offender an…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 04, 2018, 11:02:52 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo,AFAICT, the slashing protection only works against a short-term doub…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 04, 2018, 10:58:16 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo and @anonymint,I appreciate your taking time to read the paper and p…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 04, 2018, 10:52:21 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,However, I've been thinking about this design some more and I think y…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 03, 2018, 03:09:21 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,If I understand correctly, the scenario would be like the followingA…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 03, 2018, 09:31:29 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo,Proof-of-Approval also offers definitive 100% finality albeit with 1…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 02, 2018, 05:34:28 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo,Proof-of-Approval does require majority to be online but not superma…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 02, 2018, 05:27:10 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo,@d5000, I think you may remember the discussion you had last year wi…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 02, 2018, 04:48:17 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello D5000,(However, you create another threshold as you pre-select some staker…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 02, 2018, 01:28:37 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Traxo,So if those assumptions for super majority of users being online and…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 01, 2018, 11:17:37 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,Why is it not possible to present two different epocs representing th…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 01, 2018, 11:02:33 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Ix,Sorry for delay in reply Hard-coded means that each node would see the…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | June 01, 2018, 10:52:32 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Sapotacoin,The developers provided a solution to an attack that requires s…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 30, 2018, 10:45:40 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Ix,Light can travel around the Earth around 7 times a second. That means t…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 30, 2018, 10:39:09 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Eli_lyd1,Seems interesting, is there any project use Proof-of-Approval?Jus…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 29, 2018, 10:47:42 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
If two competing forks (with epochs) have absolutely equal stake (even to the bi…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 29, 2018, 10:40:05 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
You would also have to disprove relativity. I was attempting for a serious and t…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 28, 2018, 07:06:21 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
The weakest link for a typical stake based protocol, however, is the long timesp…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 28, 2018, 10:39:38 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
So why wouldn't the history attacker just do exactly that, present you with an i…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 28, 2018, 12:05:24 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteIt is a self-selection process incentivized by block approvals. Let's say s…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 28, 2018, 08:33:12 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
If you're presented with two identical looking epocs, with the same blocks and d…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 28, 2018, 08:13:56 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
2. Stake distribution is Pareto. The protocol is optimized for Pareto distributi…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 27, 2018, 04:05:51 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
2. Stake distribution is Pareto. The protocol is optimized for Pareto distributi…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 27, 2018, 03:50:32 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Just to make sure it's the right version of the protocol - https://github.com/Ta…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 27, 2018, 03:02:53 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello D5000, I incorporated epoch approval limits in the latest version of the p…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 27, 2018, 02:28:37 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Ix,Perhaps we are thinking from slightly different points of view. Individ…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 27, 2018, 01:47:31 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,Also note that a single honest stakeholder (hodler ) holding a relati…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 27, 2018, 12:38:21 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Ix,It would be nice if you could put it on a site with a direct link to th…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 27, 2018, 11:20:38 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello,Looking for some feedback on a protocol that I have been working on. Artic…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 14, 2018, 02:45:19 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Ix,If you're interested, you can check out my signature for a link to my w…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 26, 2018, 02:56:51 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Yj1190590,They could receive more approvals from using both unconflictful…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 25, 2018, 06:54:16 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,In that case, I think you have succeeding in increasing the difficult…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 24, 2018, 11:21:13 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
I am reading the whitepaper, interesting stuff and definitely looks like some go…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 23, 2018, 06:26:51 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Yj1190590,What if the block creators don't obey the rule? They could use t…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 23, 2018, 03:08:31 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
The ultimate goal, though, is to have the entire stake in the system sign every…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 23, 2018, 11:03:21 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Yj1190590,1.According to my understanding, the approvals stored in each bl…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 23, 2018, 11:00:35 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Ix,If you're interested, you can check out my signature for a link to my w…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 22, 2018, 03:10:25 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,"Proof of approval is an approximation of a PoS chain in which every…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 22, 2018, 03:08:49 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello D5000,Only a little observation (and that's why I comment here in the old…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 22, 2018, 02:59:13 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
This article explains Proof-of-Approval's defense against History or Costless Si…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 20, 2018, 11:04:00 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,I think Abdulkhaliq123 was talking about from an incentive PoV - why…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 19, 2018, 08:25:03 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Abdulkhaliq123,In that case, why approve blocks at all? There are two diff…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 18, 2018, 06:30:55 PM |
|
|
|
A development company just charged me $3300 for a first call Service Discussion
They should have clarified their fees upfront before the start of the call. What…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 18, 2018, 09:48:42 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: Version 2.0 Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,I'd like some clarification on the epoc rewards; every node on the ne…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 18, 2018, 09:44:24 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Created new thread for the updated paper since it may fix some previous problems…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | May 17, 2018, 10:53:28 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Aliashraf,I believe I have a good solution to this History attack (aka Cos…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | April 24, 2018, 05:16:10 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Slava79,Did you read Tendermint white paper ? I scanned article and the co…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 30, 2018, 05:41:04 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Bonzenboss,I read your technical paper and from what I understood it seems…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 28, 2018, 11:01:49 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,In the following example, say I had a majority of stake at block A. T…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 28, 2018, 10:42:00 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Fresheneesz,The image of how blocks are set up (https://cdn-images-1.mediu…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 24, 2018, 02:48:44 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello fresheneesz,How would other nodes detect that they're intentionally not ap…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 22, 2018, 04:20:25 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Aliashraf,Just read the article, nice work but, as one of the guys have me…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 22, 2018, 03:41:48 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Fresheneesz,Am I right that the goals of this protocol are primarily to re…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 22, 2018, 03:06:10 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Monsterer2,In the following example, say I had a majority of stake at bloc…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 22, 2018, 11:17:56 AM |
|
|
|
What happens when all nodes on the blockchain go offline? Development & Technical Discussion
It is simply impossible for someone to broadcast a transaction that does not fol…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 19, 2018, 09:49:57 AM |
|
|
|
What happens when all nodes on the blockchain go offline? Development & Technical Discussion
There is more than that the longest chain wins, it's actually the longest valid…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 19, 2018, 09:09:42 AM |
|
|
|
What happens when all nodes on the blockchain go offline? Development & Technical Discussion
How this adversary can get into the network if there are no running nodes?Let's…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 18, 2018, 06:29:37 PM |
|
|
|
What happens when all nodes on the blockchain go offline? Development & Technical Discussion
What happenes, when at some time, all nodes on the blockchain go offline? While…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 18, 2018, 04:11:33 PM |
|
|
|
Where To learn to build blockschain application? Beginners & Help
I find PyEthereum https://github.com/ethereum/pyethereum to be a great learning…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 18, 2018, 09:48:04 AM |
|
|
|
Version different coin client's relations? Altcoin Discussion
Does the client you modified have tests? If yes, run all the tests. If the tests…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 16, 2018, 01:14:39 PM |
|
|
|
Right way of pushing to Github? Development & Technical Discussion
This also might help https://product.hubspot.com/blog/git-and-github-tutorial-fo…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 16, 2018, 01:04:22 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,That's a chicken and egg problem though. You cant approve any blocks…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 16, 2018, 09:58:15 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Devx,Whole night! You are working harder than I did! Really appreciate it!Shunsa…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 15, 2018, 04:57:01 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Cellard,While "better" is just tongue-in-cheek designed to attract attenti…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 15, 2018, 03:45:56 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Anti-Cen,Thank you for taking time to review this work and providing very…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 15, 2018, 01:01:56 PM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Development & Technical Discussion
Hello Paul,I appreciate your kind words and your taking time to review this work…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 15, 2018, 11:59:30 AM |
|
|
|
Proof-of-Approval: A Better Blockchain Consensus Protocol Altcoin Discussion
Hello,Looking for some feedback on a protocol that I have been working on. Artic…
|
n/a | shunsaitakahashi | March 14, 2018, 12:08:04 PM |
Pages:
Jump to: