| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Is Stellar Permission-less? Altcoin Discussion
You can operate your stellar-core in two modes, validating or observing. If you…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | February 16, 2017, 05:03:47 PM |
|
|
|
Is Stellar Permission-less? Altcoin Discussion
There was a thread on twitter (https://twitter.com/taoeffect/status/832041974735…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | February 16, 2017, 03:25:00 PM |
|
|
|
Thoughts on Zcash? Altcoin Discussion
https://blog.okturtles.com/2016/03/the-zcash-catch/That blog post doesn't mentio…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 09, 2016, 09:13:16 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
No offense, but I'm not sure you understand "UTXO" well enough to explain it to…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | July 05, 2014, 12:31:30 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
- One of the few important things that you're missing is the recent 51% solution…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 28, 2014, 10:16:16 AM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
I'm not sure who misunderstands. I'll try to rephrase. Here's the core of my que…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 24, 2014, 10:13:34 AM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
I thought you might answer something like "do arithmetic"... I hate to say it bu…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 24, 2014, 08:13:23 AM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
I guess I'm not sure what's the ultimate goal of this. Do you want to actually p…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 23, 2014, 08:47:17 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
bitfreak: your paper is on my reading list and I have already read part of it. I…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 23, 2014, 08:18:02 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
I don't know of anyone besides me who is still working on UTXO commitments. It i…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 21, 2014, 07:46:25 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Then fork it and implement the changes - unless that is what you've been working…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 21, 2014, 02:10:53 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
That appears to be a correct description of SPV+ mode.OK cool, thanks maaku for…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 21, 2014, 02:04:52 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
In the UTXO thread, I modified the "7 steps" in the previous posts here with my…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 20, 2014, 02:29:58 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
I think it would be helpful (in general) for me to paste here my updated underst…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 20, 2014, 02:18:04 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Erm, just a note, I forgot to remove Step 7 when I copied that post:Quote7. Cont…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 20, 2014, 02:27:04 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
At the request of "HoboJerk", I've revived this thread.Copying a reply I posted…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 05:31:18 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Copying a reply I posted there which I am copying here because if my now (possib…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 07:12:35 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
It's the difference between saying: 1) I believe the UTXO checkpoint is valid be…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 20, 2014, 11:35:29 AM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
(For any audience, see SPV in Thin client security.)Ok, well again, this is stil…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 20, 2014, 11:15:36 AM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Edited point 1 in above post of mine to state:1. The ledger block of the honest…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 20, 2014, 10:14:18 AM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Let's say we only have one ledger block, or whatever, or UTXO commitment thing.…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 20, 2014, 09:59:12 AM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
I explained myself, twice:The miner needs to verify the entire block chain histo…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 20, 2014, 08:32:19 AM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Checkpoints are a temporary hack that will go away soon, we hope.Maaku, I take y…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 19, 2014, 08:26:59 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
The miner needs to verify the entire block chain history because otherwise he ha…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 11:48:56 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
OP, It seems like the bottom line is you would need massive changes to bitcoin (…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 11:12:06 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Looks like rolling-root is still needed for new nodes to be brought online relia…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 10:20:29 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
no it's worse than that -- you have to download and process every single block s…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 10:19:10 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Actually, I'm not sure about that. What's the incentive for nodes to mine on tha…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 07:52:50 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
You never ever under any circumstances want to be mining on top of a chain you h…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 07:51:02 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Could somebody here knowledgeable about the details of UTXO please confirm wheth…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 05:34:49 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
EDIT June 18, 2014: To avoid confusion: this thread is now about a solution to t…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 04, 2014, 11:34:49 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
At the request of "HoboJerk", I've revived this thread.
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 18, 2014, 03:30:55 PM |
|
|
|
A Non-Outsourceable Puzzle to Prevent Hosted Mining (and Mining Pools) Development & Technical Discussion
It was "unpopular" because it was unworkable. Of course you ignored all critici…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 17, 2014, 11:55:02 PM |
|
|
|
A Non-Outsourceable Puzzle to Prevent Hosted Mining Development & Technical Discussion
Both of these are reasonable points, at least for the time being. But think of t…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | June 17, 2014, 10:47:34 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Unspent outputs are only a transactionID and an output number. In other words…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 12, 2014, 02:38:54 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Well, this farce has gone on long enough. By now it should be perfectly clear t…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 06, 2014, 11:50:05 AM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
a) SPV clients have copy of all block headersYes, and that doesn't prevent the M…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 06, 2014, 02:01:13 AM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
No you don't or you wouldn't make mistakes like saying "transactions which are s…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 06, 2014, 01:23:09 AM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
DeathAndTaxes, replies to your constructive comments are inlined below:However e…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 11:19:48 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
you've refused to do that basic research*.False.
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 11:29:59 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Except your own Wiki says the opposite:The wiki is a public document that anyone…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 10:59:03 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteThe fact is that ancient blocks, at any given point in time, are already hi…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 10:48:42 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Quote1:31:31 PM sipa: sugarpuff: now, about dealing with ways to improve perform…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 10:20:03 PM |
|
|
|
Upgrade forums to SMF v2.x? Meta
There is new software being developed for the forums, so that's why upgrading an…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 06:54:23 PM |
|
|
|
Upgrade forums to SMF v2.x? Meta
Sorry if this was already asked (I did a search for "upgrade" and couldn't find…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 06:25:55 PM |
|
|
|
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Could etotheipi negativeone (I *just* realized what that says!) or someone knowl…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 01:58:15 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I think I addressed that in an earlier reply:I…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 04:06:33 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
True VISA scale (i.e 5,000 tps on blockchain)?Figure 5,000 transactions per seco…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 03:51:45 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin disk space scalability problem, is it really a problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Only the private key holder of the tx output can create a new tx. There is no m…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 12:36:15 AM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Your suggestion won't work because there's no way to resolve conflict over which…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 02:19:01 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Realpra, sorry, I tried, but my google-fu is failing me. The closest thing I was…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 01:50:32 PM |
|
|
|
A rolling root to solve Bitcoin's scalability problem? Development & Technical Discussion
This was debated before, what you call "rolling root" we called "ledger-solutio…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 01:32:04 PM |
|
|
|
What are the change addresses for? Electrum
Found this, not sure if it helps your particular case.What is a "Change Address"…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 01:03:52 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin disk space scalability problem, is it really a problem? Development & Technical Discussion
The restrictions are there for a good reason, to encourage learning before teach…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 01:11:51 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin disk space scalability problem, is it really a problem? Development & Technical Discussion
Discarded by whom? "Considered invalid" by whom?By all full-nodes.QuoteWhich an…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 12:26:59 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin disk space scalability problem, is it really a problem? Development & Technical Discussion
If I "sent" you coins and you didn't have the block which contained the transact…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 12:16:01 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin disk space scalability problem, is it really a problem? Development & Technical Discussion
How do you reach "internet-agreement"?One way would be to do what you already do…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 05, 2014, 12:04:16 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin disk space scalability problem, is it really a problem? Development & Technical Discussion
How else would you bring new nodes online?Download the internet-agreed upon new…
|
n/a | sugarpuff | March 04, 2014, 11:42:23 PM |
Pages:
Jump to: