| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Block size question Development & Technical Discussion
So what would happen if say 51% of nodes would switch to 2MB blocks? What would…
|
n/a | ZoomT | January 14, 2016, 10:04:54 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
Hi ZoomT, I attempted to provide a non-technical explanation of the principal fo…
|
n/a | ZoomT | January 13, 2016, 02:37:38 AM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
I propose the old chain actually keeps a record of legacy transactions, and that…
|
n/a | ZoomT | January 11, 2016, 11:41:22 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork using this idea:https://github.com/Zoo…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 30, 2015, 03:08:51 AM |
|
|
|
Soft Fork to Increase the 21M Limit? Development & Technical Discussion
Recent advancements such as "Segregated Witness" by Pieter Wuille and "Drivechai…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 21, 2015, 10:41:22 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
I was also thinking it may be possible to redesign the idea such that the old ch…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 21, 2015, 10:24:33 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
Who lost money in July 4th and 5th fork? I guess they will hate the BIP66 roll o…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 21, 2015, 10:02:39 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
ZoomT, I would assert that your definition of a generalized softfork is incomple…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 20, 2015, 12:55:05 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
No it does not. A soft fork simply lets the old chain die out if people are stil…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 20, 2015, 12:41:44 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
Which is why this is a hard fork. Old clients will outright reject the new chai…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 20, 2015, 12:37:00 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
Actually, using this proposal, it looks like the only way the old chain could su…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 20, 2015, 12:16:29 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
The way I understood it was that it is supposed to be that people on the old cha…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 20, 2015, 12:08:17 PM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
Do you see a difference?I have seen a similar proposal labeled as "extended bloc…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 20, 2015, 11:42:44 AM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
1) You are proposing to fork the blockchain without consensus.A generalized soft…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 20, 2015, 11:38:02 AM |
|
|
|
Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. Development & Technical Discussion
IntroductionIt is generally assumed that increasing the blocksize limit requires…
|
n/a | ZoomT | December 20, 2015, 06:12:48 AM |
Pages:
Jump to: