Due to that very same reason, their silence, is why I proposed to you the possibility that if no one complained on their platform or here, the bug is fixed, as there are chances other also find and could replicate the bug just as you did, tried the bug, and others complained about it. Of which your reply was that can roughly summed up as my proposal is invalid and only shows that I am clueless, and I ask [which yet to be explained up to this point] which part of it is invalid?
Feel free to evade it and give no explanation again, and blabber other things instead.
now you are admitting that you don't know if the bug/exploit is fixed but you cannot say it in a YES or NO
how funny (or not funny) is that?
This single sentence itself is eligible to make us question your logic and [borrowing your way-overused word] IQ. It is honestly frown inducing. Can't you see how that sentence contradict and answer itself? I don't know if the bug is fixed or not [I am currently inquiring about that very thing to Eva], and since I don't know about it, how on earth can I say it in a yes or no? You want me to say "yes"? If then it's not fixed, that'll be misleading. If I say "no" and it actually already fixed, I'll be making a false statement. Can't you see this very simple equation?
Let me also tell you not to twist and distort the content! you are not doing any good to the good and decent members here.
Why would you dare to discuss something you do not know and have not researched thoroughly?
Just spam your signature for a few sats.
By the way, the IQ word can never be overused in your case.
Do you really think that the person who knows and uses it will file a complaint or come here???
Hmm... I think it'll be safe to assume and imagine the rough form of that glitch based on your explanation here, or perhaps the ones in a quite detail, given on the opening post. Can't people guess what's the exploit looks like?
No one can guess how the exploit looks like. only after you have played against the one who knows it and uses it against you, only then can you understand the exploit. but again, only if you are an expert of the blackjack game. the one who knows the exploit like me can explain it.
The owner who is also the developer can check the game logs and can see where the exploit was used and how the exploit works. but till today Blackjack.fun and Eva did not answer if they fixed it! I guess they did not fix it because they removed the free rolls.
And the reason it's brought and mentioned here if you can't prove it, is...?
Sorry, what does this answer mean? what does it have to do with the other member who opened and closed the scam accusation against Blackjack.fun after mine? please elaborate
My guess is that you did not, because it is a simple YES or NO question, and if not, why do you even discuss this bug/exploit issue
On their platform, no. But playing BJ? Yeah, occasionally, for fun. I can't see how this is relevant to your explanation. If may elaborate, and perhaps begin explaining that way overdue explanation?
sorry again. how can someone discuss a game he did not play at the casino we are discussing here. every casino may have different rules of their blackjack game they offer. means it is very important to visit the casino and play a game or two.
It is even more important to have a deeper knowledge of the blackjack game if we are talking about an exploit and not a simple bug.
Let's see when we can start to have a normal and fair conversation about this matter