Pages:
Author

Topic: . - page 4. (Read 3273 times)

legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
January 18, 2016, 09:55:11 AM
#5
This........AGAIN.

The fiat banking system is too greedy to create a rival blockchain to transfer money like bitcoin. Can you imagine the fees they'd set Grin

It'd be rendered useless as a direct competitor to bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
January 18, 2016, 09:52:10 AM
#4
Hiring Mike Hearn has now turned into a liability, they really need to

dump his ass quick, can you imagine being associated with the fool


legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
January 18, 2016, 09:38:58 AM
#3
not this again please, it would only be a centralized version of bitcoin, so basically a fiat that run on a blockchain

also the only reason for them to run one would be proof of integrity, cost and time is not a real problem they are facing with their cluster servers, right now...
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 603
January 18, 2016, 09:30:58 AM
#2
I thought there were banks supporting the blockchain but not creating their own version of Bitcoin. But the question is how can Bitcoin Classic help banks? I mean weren't banks focusing on an altcoin like ripple?
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030
Twitter @realmicroguy
January 18, 2016, 09:22:57 AM
#1
.
Pages:
Jump to: