Topic: - page 3. (Read 3206 times)
If you have the skill, of course Skill-based games are profitable. But Lucky-based games can be more profitable, cuz when you win you will earn a lot. But in skill based games, you will a small long term profit. Depends on your skill, if you have a nice skill then you could earn a big long term profit.
Well it depends actually, a skill-based games will be good only for skilled people , not for normal gamblers and a luck-based game will be good for both skilled and normal gamblers. But personally, I think luck-based games will be more profitable because it was easy to win, unlike on skilled-games like poker, you will need skills and experience which I don't have 
But for a professional gambler, such skilled-based games were perfect for them since they can manage how to get profit easily with less chances of losing
But for a professional gambler, such skilled-based games were perfect for them since they can manage how to get profit easily with less chances of losing 
You can't depend on your luck so of course the most profitable is going to be skill based games.
You can't control your luck but you can control your skills.
You can't control your luck but you can control your skills.
Exactly. Therefore with skill you have more chance.
But when it comes to gambling you don't have a fair chance at all.
It's a game where the house will win always.
First of all none of them are profitable.
Secondly both are very risky and it's 100% certain you won't make any more on the long term.
Secondly both are very risky and it's 100% certain you won't make any more on the long term.
Luck based games are just a gamble out in the open.
With cards or skill based gambles there is actually a chance you will win and which you control.
This factor makes skill-based gambles have improve your chances to win.
I like one quote that i saw in poker automatics site.
"One day in poker is 90% luck and 10% skill. One year in poker is 90% skill and 10% luck"
I think that reflects very well my opinion. Skill based games surely is the best way to make a profit in the long term.
First of all none of them are profitable.
Secondly both are very risky and it's 100% certain you won't make any more on the long term.
Secondly both are very risky and it's 100% certain you won't make any more on the long term.
Luck based games are just a gamble out in the open.
With cards or skill based gambles there is actually a chance you will win and which you control.
This factor makes skill-based gambles have improve your chances to win.
If you're good enough in your domain, the best is by far the skill-based games. If you're skilled nowhere, lucky-based games even if risky could bring you a little of money after huge losses.
but luck based game for example dice are super fast you just click and get results where you have the possibility of winning a big amount even. but in skill based games they are slow and require a lot of thinking usually and earnings is a moderate amount and not so huge.
If anyone is even thinking luck based games can be more profitable in the long run than skill-based games, they are delusional. By definition you will lose on lucky based games due to the house edge. While skill based games, you have control over your game.
If you are good at a skill based game, you can actually turn up good profits and ROI. You can never become good at luck based games besides from running the least losing strategy.
If you are good at a skill based game, you can actually turn up good profits and ROI. You can never become good at luck based games besides from running the least losing strategy.
If you think of bustabit as a skill game, then i have to warn you that you are wrong. You cant profit at this kind of gambling-skill games. They just make you feel it is a skill based game rather than luck 
Bustabit does have a small skill factor in the 1% "bonus" that are split among players based on their bet sizes and cashout points.
Obviously it's skill based games. Luck based games you can't control and you'll eventually lose to the house. You cannot have infinite luck. However with skill based games(even partial skill based) is better because you control at least a factor in winning. So if you're really good at it, you'll win consistently.
I think skill based games are more profitable compared to luck based games, skill based games would profit you if you know really what you are playing..
If you think of bustabit as a skill game, then i have to warn you that you are wrong. You cant profit at this kind of gambling-skill games. They just make you feel it is a skill based game rather than luck
In skill based games u need luck, in luck based games u need some skill. One is not go without other. Cause of that we have word gambling. Gambling explain all that. I'm playing poker and roulette mostly this days, and I can say u need both to make money.
In what way do you need skill in a luck based game like dice and roulette, when each bet is independent and completely random?
yeah, in a luck based gambling game like dice you don't need any skills, you just set a minimum bet with multiplier and click roll then sit back and watch.
you can do things like changing the strategy like using modified martingale in order to guarantee that if you win the total is not a loss. but that is not skill, maybe experience.
In skill based games u need luck, in luck based games u need some skill. One is not go without other. Cause of that we have word gambling. Gambling explain all that. I'm playing poker and roulette mostly this days, and I can say u need both to make money.
In what way do you need skill in a luck based game like dice and roulette, when each bet is independent and completely random?
Jump to: