e^(-i*pi) + 1 = 0
Nah.
e^(-i*pi) = Armory. +1
Topic: . - page 2. (Read 6289 times)
x = y = 32
-x^2= -xy
x^2 - y^2 = x^2 - xy
(x + y)(x - y) = x(x - y)
x + y = x
32+32 = 32
64 = 32
-x^2= -xy
x^2 - y^2 = x^2 - xy
(x + y)(x - y) = x(x - y)
x + y = x
32+32 = 32
64 = 32
Yes, if you allow division of zero you can prove almost any mathematical lie.
x = y = 32
-x^2= -xy
x^2 - y^2 = x^2 - xy
(x + y)(x - y) = x(x - y)
x + y = x
32+32 = 32
64 = 32
-x^2= -xy
x^2 - y^2 = x^2 - xy
(x + y)(x - y) = x(x - y)
x + y = x
32+32 = 32
64 = 32
When it comes to money and markets things are a little less Bertrand Russell than you might expect—and a little more Ursula K. Le Guin than you might expect.
I know...while taking Calculus 4 I also took Econ 101. I skipped a lot of the Econ classes because "it's just simple arithmetic" right?
Not so much...I think I got a D in Econ 101. Crazy voodoo math.
I later took Accounting for my Master's degree and determined not to make the same mistake I listened to the lecture on credits and debits about 20 times until it finally "clicked". After failing the first few homework/quizzes, after it clicked I finally got it and finished the course with a B.
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic?
Because it's chodpaba.
You registered in May of 2011 - didn't you read his spread analysis thread?
He stopped because too many people caught on that he was the best - and it screwed up his own trading.
Shhh... Everyone was supposed to forget about that by now.
How well does your model handle the current situation of continuously breaking new highs? Wasn't it based on historical volume at various prices?
There is still a lot of unbroken ground with that idea, but I have been moving along another development path. Mostly, what I am seeing tells me to hold on for the ride. I it is perilous to try to trade on a parabolic slope. The only reason I am saying anything is because I am not trading. If that changes I will probably clam up.
You heard it here folks, when Chodpaba quits posting the top is in!
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic?
Because it's chodpaba.
You registered in May of 2011 - didn't you read his spread analysis thread?
He stopped because too many people caught on that he was the best - and it screwed up his own trading.
Shhh... Everyone was supposed to forget about that by now.
How well does your model handle the current situation of continuously breaking new highs? Wasn't it based on historical volume at various prices?
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic?
Because it's chodpaba.
You registered in May of 2011 - didn't you read his spread analysis thread?
He stopped because too many people caught on that he was the best - and it screwed up his own trading.
Just saying.
So you saying that bubble will burst at $1024 in two years?
I know you know some shit about some shit, but LOL! Not this rally
I am saying, we have yet to see exuberance.
I am also saying—2 years.
Fair 'nuff!
Hey, are you stealing my name? Don't listen to this poser, he clearly is trying to imitate me badly!
I know you know some shit about some shit, but LOL! Not this rally
I am saying, we have yet to see exuberance.
I am also saying—2 years.
Fair 'nuff!
Just saying.
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic?
2009+5=2014
by god, you heard it here first folks! bitcoin will be $2014 in 5 days!
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye
Just saying.
Thanks for posting a mathematical equivalency, what is your point? Why is this in speculation and not off-topic?
2009+5=2014
Jump to: