Topic: 中本聪的真实身份 - page 2. (Read 7611 times)
不管怎样，他这种隐退的方式是非常值得赞许的
很想聽聽本人的演講
看看究竟是什麼樣的人
看看究竟是什麼樣的人
还是保持上帝的姿态好。
不管怎样，Bitcoin都对其作者产生着巨大的经济利益。
今天看btc123上的一些链接，偶然看到圣经（中本聪的论文），其落款包含bitcoin.org网址，然后查了下whois域名注册信息，顺手再看了下维基，线索很清楚。
以下3个专利申请人Neal, Vladimir, Charles在其注册专利的说明中，采用了和中本聪论文一样的一个短语，申请专利的日期在bitcoin.org注册前3天。
相信文本校验的力量。
已经有前人做过详尽分析 http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2011/10/race-unmask-bitcoins-inventors/43535/
1.中本聪论文的英语毫无瑕疵，不是出自日本人之手
2.语法是英式语法（曾有一次换为美语），时间也符合英国的作息时间
被猜疑者的回应：我不是中本，但即使我是，我也不会告诉你。
He flat out denies that he is Nakamoto. "I'm not Satoshi" he told Davis. "But even if I was I wouldn't tell you.
维基原文：
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto#Satoshi_Nakamoto
Identity
Investigations into the real identity of Satoshi Nakamoto have been attempted by The New Yorker and Fast Company. Fast Company's investigation brought up circumstantial evidence that indicated a link between an encryption patent application filed by Neal King, Vladimir Oksman and Charles Bry on 15 August 2008, and the bitcoin.org domain name which was registered 72 hours later. The patent application (#20100042841) contained networking and encryption technologies similar to bitcoin's. After textual analysis, the phrase "...computationally impractical to reverse" was found in both the patent application and bitcoin's whitepaper.[1] All three inventors explicitly denied being Satoshi Nakamoto.[42][43]
以下3个专利申请人Neal, Vladimir, Charles在其注册专利的说明中，采用了和中本聪论文一样的一个短语，申请专利的日期在bitcoin.org注册前3天。
相信文本校验的力量。
已经有前人做过详尽分析 http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2011/10/race-unmask-bitcoins-inventors/43535/
1.中本聪论文的英语毫无瑕疵，不是出自日本人之手
2.语法是英式语法（曾有一次换为美语），时间也符合英国的作息时间
被猜疑者的回应：我不是中本，但即使我是，我也不会告诉你。
He flat out denies that he is Nakamoto. "I'm not Satoshi" he told Davis. "But even if I was I wouldn't tell you.
维基原文：
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto#Satoshi_Nakamoto
Identity
Investigations into the real identity of Satoshi Nakamoto have been attempted by The New Yorker and Fast Company. Fast Company's investigation brought up circumstantial evidence that indicated a link between an encryption patent application filed by Neal King, Vladimir Oksman and Charles Bry on 15 August 2008, and the bitcoin.org domain name which was registered 72 hours later. The patent application (#20100042841) contained networking and encryption technologies similar to bitcoin's. After textual analysis, the phrase "...computationally impractical to reverse" was found in both the patent application and bitcoin's whitepaper.[1] All three inventors explicitly denied being Satoshi Nakamoto.[42][43]
Jump to: