Topic: . - page 5. (Read 4427 times)
2. destroyed the original public/private key labels
Damn, I would have been interested in buying these.
Any chance you tested these private keys before you destroyed them? I don't know if anyone has ever peeled any of the Ravenbit assembled coins and actually proved the private keys match the public.
We did test a small sample of the private keys and they were good, matching up to the provided first-bits and address listings from Ravenbit. The addresses were seemingly generated and applied accurately.
Unfortunately they were destroyed and disposed of as discussed for this project since we saw no value in keeping them around. They were all unfunded coins so I believe no CLAMS or anything else could have been retrieved. May I ask what the value would be for the peeled key sets?
2. destroyed the original public/private key labels
Damn, I would have been interested in buying these.
Any chance you tested these private keys before you destroyed them? I don't know if anyone has ever peeled any of the Ravenbit assembled coins and actually proved the private keys match the public.
I'm sorry if this sounds dumb but what do you mean by "Pod-ify"?
Not a dumb question at all, I don't believe it was mentioned anywhere with a full explanation.
For our first series Ravenbit coins were "Podified"/"Pod-ify" where we:
1. removed the original hologram from the coin
2. destroyed the original public/private key labels
3. finally replaced the public/private key labels with our own generated keys and replaced the hologram with our own "sticker"
As MJ mentioned, we "Pod-ify" the coin when we assemble it ourselves using our branding and securely generated keys.
The #1 Satoshi coin was DIY and didn't require the original hologram removed, although we believe destroying an already created coin is not required for "Podification".
Gimme set #3
Sorry i didnt know coin #23 wasnt in set #23
Trying to steal Deffy's numbers? Negs incoming! 
I'm a bit confused with the numbering, the set # and the coin #'s are different?
The # printed with the public key is the coin# not set#? If so I would like set #22.
The # printed with the public key is the coin# not set#? If so I would like set #22.
No problem and yes, the numbering is a little different than usual since set #1 contains coin #2, #35, & #68. Coin #1 is standalone and is not included in one of the 3-Coin sets.
The table that MJ has provided shows the numbering for the 3 sets of 33 coins which make up the last 99/100 of the Ravenbit Podified Series.
If you have any further questions please feel free to ask away!
Jump to: