Pages:
Author

Topic: . (Read 3199 times)

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
.
September 22, 2013, 06:41:12 AM
#22
I am not going to give this try just for few ubtc and lost all your privacy  Grin
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
September 22, 2013, 06:35:08 AM
#21
here is mine ^^ nBEsoV
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Ask me anything if you have any problem
September 22, 2013, 05:42:43 AM
#20
WARNING

DO NOT INSTALL THE PLUGIN! I unpacked it and found that it contains code that tracks URL's, titles, and KEYSTROKES and sends them to their server.

This is probably a bad attempt on hacking!
That really scary
full member
Activity: 223
Merit: 100
September 22, 2013, 05:12:19 AM
#19
WARNING

DO NOT INSTALL THE PLUGIN! I unpacked it and found that it contains code that tracks URL's, titles, and KEYSTROKES and sends them to their server.

This is probably a bad attempt on hacking!
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Ask me anything if you have any problem
September 22, 2013, 04:51:02 AM
#18
server error.
How it pay ? Does it really pay for browsing ?
hero member
Activity: 562
Merit: 500
September 22, 2013, 04:42:57 AM
#17
server error.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Ask me anything if you have any problem
September 22, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
#16
It always shows server error
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
September 22, 2013, 03:40:40 AM
#15
I heard about bitgifts yesterday, and I would like to try it, but I feel my privacy is more valuable than a few uBTC...
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 502
Circa 2010
September 22, 2013, 03:33:37 AM
#14
Are you on version 1.0.5?

Well, considering I thought it was a scam, I obviously uninstalled it. As far as I know it was the newest version up until about ~ 3 hours ago. I have redacted my post following the confirmation received from TradeFortress.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
September 22, 2013, 03:29:02 AM
#13


This screenshot is representative of the Inputs account [email protected] as of posting and the transactions are to unique users.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
September 22, 2013, 03:27:35 AM
#12
You may have surfed a variety of sites (I don't know), however none of them passed the anti spam algorithm. A suggestion would be don't browse web pages too fast.

I spent a good one hour surfing on sites that I usually do, Bitcointalk, Pandora, Bitbook, CoinChat etc at a normal pace to ensure that I was giving your extension a fair go to actually credit. I don't believe the issue to be on my end (unless ABP or Hola has something to do with it) so you may want to look into that as well. Thus far I have temporarily redacted my post.
Are you on version 1.0.5?
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 502
Circa 2010
September 22, 2013, 03:22:22 AM
#11
You may have surfed a variety of sites (I don't know), however none of them passed the anti spam algorithm. A suggestion would be don't browse web pages too fast.

I spent a good one hour surfing on sites that I usually do, Bitcointalk, Pandora, Bitbook, CoinChat etc at a normal pace to ensure that I was giving your extension a fair go to actually credit. I don't believe the issue to be on my end (unless ABP or Hola has something to do with it) so you may want to look into that as well. Thus far I have temporarily redacted my post.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
September 22, 2013, 03:16:35 AM
#10
Code:
Sorry, but this referral code isn't valid! Keep in mind it's case sensitive.
Enter a referral code (eg DsxkR5) first and then enter BITCOINTALK as a gift code.

The check is >= 0.3 now.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Swiss Money all around me!
September 22, 2013, 03:12:27 AM
#9
Code:
Sorry, but this referral code isn't valid! Keep in mind it's case sensitive.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
September 22, 2013, 03:10:29 AM
#8
First off you might want to consider the fact that you infer from your initial post that you get paid for surfing on any site. If there are specific paying pages I would appreciate it if you could note that down on your initial post that only a set few pages actually pay, seeing as I tested your extension on a wide variety of sites.  

Secondly, the whole purpose of this exercise is to confirm that your site actually pays and does not instead waste people's time. If you could provide proof of at least a single payment I am more than happy to redact my post and apologize for jumping to conclusions.
You may have surfed a variety of sites (I don't know), however none of them passed the anti spam algorithm. A suggestion would be don't browse web pages too fast.

Here's the transactions on [email protected]. I edited out the first payout email for the user's privacy, however I have asked the user to publicly confirm their withdrawal here as well as for Inputs to confirm that I am not merely sending it to myself.

https://i.imgur.com/wNh7mQA.png
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 502
Circa 2010
September 22, 2013, 02:59:23 AM
#7
The check is > 0.03, you had exactly 0.03 which is why it said not enough balance.

But since you had exactly 0.03, it means you didn't actually browse any paying pages. That's not the intended purpose of the extension, we don't get any referrals / affiliate payouts that way.

All cash outs are manual, and if you sign up, use a code, and refer two people 2 minutes to each other, both of them who abandoned their account, one of them from a VPN, you are not going to get paid.

We do pay, we've already done a cash out to someone who isn't trying to game the system like you, and I've tipped 100 MBTC to random people last night.

First off you might want to consider the fact that you infer from your initial post that you get paid for surfing on any site. If there are specific paying pages I would appreciate it if you could note that down on your initial post that only a set few pages actually pay, seeing as I tested your extension on a wide variety of sites.  

Secondly, the whole purpose of this exercise is to confirm that your site actually pays and does not instead waste people's time. If you could provide proof of at least a single payment I am more than happy to redact my post and apologize for jumping to conclusions.

EDIT: And you might want to mention that the check is > 3 instead of giving the impression that it is a minimum of 3.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
September 22, 2013, 02:42:20 AM
#6
The check is > 0.03, you had exactly 0.03 which is why it said not enough balance.

But since you had exactly 0.03, it means you didn't actually browse any paying pages. That's not the intended purpose of the extension, we don't get any referrals / affiliate payouts that way.

All cash outs are manual, and if you sign up, use a code, and refer two people 2 minutes to each other, both of them who abandoned their account, one of them from a VPN, you are not going to get paid.

We do pay, we've already done a cash out to someone who isn't trying to game the system like you, and I've tipped 100 MBTC to random people last night.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 502
Circa 2010
September 22, 2013, 01:12:27 AM
#5
Post redacted following confirmation from TradeFortress.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 502
Circa 2010
September 22, 2013, 12:39:17 AM
#4
Interesting business model. Just don't participate in the coinchat referral contest Tongue

Well considering the fact that one of the promotional codes is "coinchat" I think you might want to be make sure they don't pollute the site with crappy referrals.
b!z
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
September 22, 2013, 12:38:07 AM
#3
How long does it take on avg to earn 0.01?
Pages:
Jump to: