good luck everyone!
Topic: . - page 2. (Read 968 times)
no reservations of old numbers owned?
lot 1 @ 0.0006
lot 1 @ 0.0006
If that were the case I would have saved the same numbers I needed for my sets.
If that were the case you would have all the number 1 coins if memory serves me correctly.
well that should have been the case
but well whatever
lot 1 @ 0.001 BTC
How do we know killyou didn't exit scam from original 2019 coin and sold account, this new ffrankie person may be imposter killyou just trying to making BTC from duplicates of 2019 coin, can y prove me wrong?!
20 @ 0.0004BTC
21 @ 0.0004BTC
All left @ 0.0002BTC
20 @ 0.0004BTC
21 @ 0.0004BTC
All left @ 0.0002BTC
I appreciate the bids.
The whole coin council can prove you wrong.
If that were the case I would have saved the same numbers I needed for my sets.
You can still bid on the numbers u want.
no reservations of old numbers owned?
lot 1 @ 0.0006
lot 1 @ 0.0006
If that were the case I would have saved the same numbers I needed for my sets.
If that were the case you would have all the number 1 coins if memory serves me correctly.
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market.
If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture.
The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin
I will not convert their bid to USD and try to daydream up your production cost + additional runs? If they were not informed that another 100 of these were in production it is an asshole move. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded.
You effectively increased the mintage number by 100%.
Since when does production cost = manufacture cost? The cost of manufacture is lower than production as production includes a variety of expenses while manufacture is the sole cost of production of said item. At least to my understanding.
I did not break even with the 2019 coin, and if you include the cost of the design for the 2018 coin I did not break even.
Your ass salesmanship has nothing to do with this. Your production vs. manufacturing dictionary-off has nothing to do with this. Are you unable to answer a question without leading off down an irrelevant trail?
Was the second run of 100 coins planned and known about when you offered sales/auctions of coins 1-100 of the first batch?
I stand by this statement as a collector and seeing a seemingly limited mintage of coins double in size AFTER sales took place based on low serial numbers.
If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded.
If the second 100 started as serials 101 to 200 I wouldn't even be arguing this.
Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market.
If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture.
The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin
I will not convert their bid to USD and try to daydream up your production cost + additional runs? If they were not informed that another 100 of these were in production it is an asshole move. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded.
You effectively increased the mintage number by 100%.
Since when does production cost = manufacture cost? The cost of manufacture is lower than production as production includes a variety of expenses while manufacture is the sole cost of production of said item. At least to my understanding.
I did not break even with the 2019 coin, and if you include the cost of the design for the 2018 coin I did not break even.
You should teach a course at Wharton.
Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market.
If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture.
The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin
I will not convert their bid to USD and try to daydream up your production cost + additional runs? If they were not informed that another 100 of these were in production it is an asshole move. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded.
You effectively increased the mintage number by 100%.
Since when does production cost = manufacture cost? The cost of manufacture is lower than production as production includes a variety of expenses while manufacture is the sole cost of production of said item. At least to my understanding.
I did not break even with the 2019 coin, and if you include the cost of the design for the 2018 coin I did not break even.
Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market.
If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture.
The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin
I will not convert their bid to USD and try to daydream up your production cost + additional runs? If they were not informed that another 100 of these were in production it is an asshole move. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded.
You effectively increased the mintage number by 100%.
Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market.
If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture.
The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin
Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market.
no worry tee, I'm fine with it, but thanks anyway
edit: 48 it have been, will serve as small xmas treasures
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53114797 
Jump to: