Topic: 中国的比特币阴谋，比你知道的更大 - page 4. (Read 3988 times)
学习了
楼主知道得太多了
翻译效果一般般 
有道理, 写得不错
在这里老是被消息玩
很有趣, 让朋友看一下
学习了！
比特币不是由任何中央组织控制的，不受监管的货币。这是一个事实。它是开放的，任何想操纵的人都可以来操纵，这是事实。除非，你是借钱买比特币，并贷款有利息，比特币的价格波动应该不会影响你，因为不会有什么卖的压力。
这就是为什么我们在这本杂志抛出中国操纵比特币价格的阴谋论后，社区讨论如此热烈。
你是在开玩笑吧。首先，具有讽刺意义的是，社区高呼操纵一个不受管制的市场。当然这这个市场是要被操纵的。我们最后一次检查人类是不老实的资本家，第二，如果真有操纵，它很可能是从CoinDesk和比特币基金会。
对比特币而言，CoinDesk是迄今为止最响亮的主流声音，由他们的Alexa排名，以及在Twitter上他们的RT数可见一斑。
你看，我要明确，我们不是指责这两个组织有任何形式的操纵手法。我们只是想让社社区知道，比特币还在狂野西部，每个人都要提醒哪些买最流行的数字货币的买家，警惕操纵的手段。如果他们想操纵价格，基金会和CoinDesk很容易地做到这一点。
话虽这么说，有一个好消息。 除了CoinDesk 外，newsBTC ， coinreport ，Money & Tech，正在迅速攀升的排名，并提供加密货币的另一种声音。在此之上，这个基金确实提供了一个非常有价值的服务，成为比特币生态系统的一部分。该基金会足够透明的，人们想改，可以强制改变。
再次，我要明确。我们只是指明。我可以很容易地指出巴里·希尔伯特，文克莱沃斯双胞胎，Chamath，他们拥有多少比特币。他们有自己的说法。有没有人审核呢？难道他们说的是实话？难道他们拥有超过他们声称的比特币？难道他们勾结在一起呢？你看，我们可以继续下去，但是我们需要提醒大家，在这个世界上，没有任何规则和规章可以保护我们。
就个人而言，我们希望它保持这种方式。我们希望看到的唯一变化是停止发牢骚。
评论：这篇文章其实想说，中国操纵不了比特币，美国才能。
The China Bitcoin Conspiracy, It Could Be Much Bigger Than You Know
Bitcoin is an unregulated currency not controlled by any central organization. This is a fact. It is open to manipulation to those who are easily manipulated, this is a fact. Unless, you are borrowing money to buy Bitcoin and have interest payments to make on the loan, the price volatility of Bitcoin should not affect you in anyway, because there would be no pressure to sell.
Which is why we at this magazine find it hilarious that there are so many conspiracy theories and cries of foul intentions in the community being thrown out that accuse China (the Country) of trying to manipulate the price of Bitcoin.
You have to be kidding. First, it is ironic that the community is crying about manipulation in an unregulated market. Of course it is going to be manipulated. Last time we checked humans were not honest capitalists and second if there really was manipulation it would probably be coming from CoinDesk and the The Bitcoin Foundation.
CoinDesk is by far the loudest mainstream voice for Bitcoin, evidenced by their Alexa rank as well as their RT count on twitter. Jon Matonis, the Executive Director of the foundation regularly writes for the magazine and the magazine regularly does beautiful write ups of the BTC Foundation’s paying Silver and Gold Members. The amount of web traffic that is driven to those site links are the equivalent of Gold to these companies. In a digital world SEO is king. On top of this, the CoinDesk price index is what the foundation uses to charge it’s members and is generally accepted as the price by mainstream media.
Look, let me be clear, We are not accusing those two organizations of any sort of manipulative tactics whatsoever. We are just trying to show the community how much of a Wild West that Bitcoin still is and everyone needs to take a buyer beware approach to the most popular digital currency. If they wanted to manipulate the price, the Foundation and CoinDesk could easily do it.
That being said, there is good news. newsBTC, coinreport, Money & Tech, are quickly creeping up in the rankings and provide another voice for cryptocurrencies in addition to CoinDesk. On top of this, the Foundation does provide an extremely valuable service and needs to be a part of the ecosystem. The Foundation is transparent enough and people can force a change if they cared to.
Again, let me be clear. We are just trying to make a point here. I could just as easily point to Barry Silbert, The Winklevoss twins and Chamath’s claims of how much Bitcoin they own. Has anyone audited them? Are they telling the truth? Do they own more than they claim? Are they colluding together? You see, we can go on and on, but it is all of us who need to be cautious in a world where there are no rules and regulations to protect us.
Personally, we want it to stay this way. The only change we want to see is the whining to stop.
本文固定链接: 三个硬币 | http://www.3-coin.com/2014-04-26/1246/
这就是为什么我们在这本杂志抛出中国操纵比特币价格的阴谋论后，社区讨论如此热烈。
你是在开玩笑吧。首先，具有讽刺意义的是，社区高呼操纵一个不受管制的市场。当然这这个市场是要被操纵的。我们最后一次检查人类是不老实的资本家，第二，如果真有操纵，它很可能是从CoinDesk和比特币基金会。
对比特币而言，CoinDesk是迄今为止最响亮的主流声音，由他们的Alexa排名，以及在Twitter上他们的RT数可见一斑。
你看，我要明确，我们不是指责这两个组织有任何形式的操纵手法。我们只是想让社社区知道，比特币还在狂野西部，每个人都要提醒哪些买最流行的数字货币的买家，警惕操纵的手段。如果他们想操纵价格，基金会和CoinDesk很容易地做到这一点。
话虽这么说，有一个好消息。 除了CoinDesk 外，newsBTC ， coinreport ，Money & Tech，正在迅速攀升的排名，并提供加密货币的另一种声音。在此之上，这个基金确实提供了一个非常有价值的服务，成为比特币生态系统的一部分。该基金会足够透明的，人们想改，可以强制改变。
再次，我要明确。我们只是指明。我可以很容易地指出巴里·希尔伯特，文克莱沃斯双胞胎，Chamath，他们拥有多少比特币。他们有自己的说法。有没有人审核呢？难道他们说的是实话？难道他们拥有超过他们声称的比特币？难道他们勾结在一起呢？你看，我们可以继续下去，但是我们需要提醒大家，在这个世界上，没有任何规则和规章可以保护我们。
就个人而言，我们希望它保持这种方式。我们希望看到的唯一变化是停止发牢骚。
评论：这篇文章其实想说，中国操纵不了比特币，美国才能。
The China Bitcoin Conspiracy, It Could Be Much Bigger Than You Know
Bitcoin is an unregulated currency not controlled by any central organization. This is a fact. It is open to manipulation to those who are easily manipulated, this is a fact. Unless, you are borrowing money to buy Bitcoin and have interest payments to make on the loan, the price volatility of Bitcoin should not affect you in anyway, because there would be no pressure to sell.
Which is why we at this magazine find it hilarious that there are so many conspiracy theories and cries of foul intentions in the community being thrown out that accuse China (the Country) of trying to manipulate the price of Bitcoin.
You have to be kidding. First, it is ironic that the community is crying about manipulation in an unregulated market. Of course it is going to be manipulated. Last time we checked humans were not honest capitalists and second if there really was manipulation it would probably be coming from CoinDesk and the The Bitcoin Foundation.
CoinDesk is by far the loudest mainstream voice for Bitcoin, evidenced by their Alexa rank as well as their RT count on twitter. Jon Matonis, the Executive Director of the foundation regularly writes for the magazine and the magazine regularly does beautiful write ups of the BTC Foundation’s paying Silver and Gold Members. The amount of web traffic that is driven to those site links are the equivalent of Gold to these companies. In a digital world SEO is king. On top of this, the CoinDesk price index is what the foundation uses to charge it’s members and is generally accepted as the price by mainstream media.
Look, let me be clear, We are not accusing those two organizations of any sort of manipulative tactics whatsoever. We are just trying to show the community how much of a Wild West that Bitcoin still is and everyone needs to take a buyer beware approach to the most popular digital currency. If they wanted to manipulate the price, the Foundation and CoinDesk could easily do it.
That being said, there is good news. newsBTC, coinreport, Money & Tech, are quickly creeping up in the rankings and provide another voice for cryptocurrencies in addition to CoinDesk. On top of this, the Foundation does provide an extremely valuable service and needs to be a part of the ecosystem. The Foundation is transparent enough and people can force a change if they cared to.
Again, let me be clear. We are just trying to make a point here. I could just as easily point to Barry Silbert, The Winklevoss twins and Chamath’s claims of how much Bitcoin they own. Has anyone audited them? Are they telling the truth? Do they own more than they claim? Are they colluding together? You see, we can go on and on, but it is all of us who need to be cautious in a world where there are no rules and regulations to protect us.
Personally, we want it to stay this way. The only change we want to see is the whining to stop.
本文固定链接: 三个硬币 | http://www.3-coin.com/2014-04-26/1246/
Jump to: