Pages:
Author

Topic: [0Th]Ozcoin Pooled Mining |DGM 1%|Stratum+VarDiff port 80|NEW CN mining| - page 31. (Read 398185 times)

full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Love the Bitcoin.
Public Disclosure.

On Saturday afternoon I was notified that Strongcoin was holding 568 BTC believed to be from the Ozcoin theft. Everytime you make a payment from StrongCoin the fee goes to 1STRonGxnFTeJiA7pgyneKknR29AwBM77 so any payments from strongcoin held accounts are easily traced back to the site.


I was asked by 2 separate people on this forum if I could hold the funds (Sorry to the people I didn't reply to). The evidence that these funds came from the heist seemed plausible to me.

At 8am yesterday morning the funds were intercepted when the user made a payment.

https://blockchain.info/address/1DsFCAZaxhJ9YGw5X8NCW9VkSMDZMyXzMF

I've spoken to the user in question over email. The user says he sold a car for BTC but can't reveal who to due to an NDA agreement.

Graeme and I had a conversation over the phone and some evidence came to light, that to me, made it very likely the user I have contact with was connected to the heist. I'm not going to reveal any details of the user accept to legal authorities if asked. I believe we should abide by due process.

I have sent a link to this post to the user so he/she can comment. Otherwise in the next few hours I will return the funds to Graeme, he can then decide what happens to those funds.
Could I be sent the alias of the person that you think is connected to the hacking?

Thanks

Lulz, newb.
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
...
Could I be sent the alias of the person that you think is connected to the hacking?

Thanks
Did you bother to read the post you quoted?
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1020
Be A Digital Miner
I do not want to pollute the string too much but I really have to say that reading this string from 98 on has really made me feel a lot better about bitcoin and the integrity of many of the people involved.  There are a lot of people that worked hard to make sure that was handled in a just manner.
I am really impressed with the integrity of graet and for dogisland doing the right thing.   Obviously, there were a lot of others involved and working hard and that really impressed me also.   Kudos to all.
sr. member
Activity: 383
Merit: 250
It seems some of the passwords were reset. If you cannot log in, use the password reset option on the web page. I read all the forum posts and did not see any announcement that a password reset was required.
vip
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
Thanks dogisland
17ABbLZPYwWzsSquYsKxfWAzMcWuNJZBna
is a fresh address
and a great relief Smiley
Graeme

Sent. https://blockchain.info/address/17ABbLZPYwWzsSquYsKxfWAzMcWuNJZBna

member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
People please, can't you read?

It was written few times in this thread how much money was involved and also it was written in here what caused this, what is the point of asking questions that already have been answered? Keep this thread clean for people who come to it to get update on current situation.

And by the way bravo to Strongcoin for fighting the crime!
sr. member
Activity: 327
Merit: 250
Might somebody please specify,how much btc was involved?
yxt
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 1116
donator
Activity: 668
Merit: 500
At 8am yesterday morning the funds were intercepted when the user made a payment.

https://blockchain.info/address/1DsFCAZaxhJ9YGw5X8NCW9VkSMDZMyXzMF
Um, how does that work?  I thought strongcoin didn't control any private keys?  How can the funds be "intercepted"?

Regardless I'm glad graet has gotten a fraction of his money back.
I can only assume you pulled on him the same trick he pulled on Ozcoin - hacking the JS you delivered to his browser?  Just desserts I guess.  Smiley
donator
Activity: 668
Merit: 500
At 8am yesterday morning the funds were intercepted when the user made a payment.

https://blockchain.info/address/1DsFCAZaxhJ9YGw5X8NCW9VkSMDZMyXzMF
Um, how does that work?  I thought strongcoin didn't control any private keys?  How can the funds be "intercepted"?

Regardless I'm glad graet has gotten a fraction of his money back.
vip
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
Public Disclosure.

On Saturday afternoon I was notified that Strongcoin was holding 568 BTC believed to be from the Ozcoin theft. Everytime you make a payment from StrongCoin the fee goes to 1STRonGxnFTeJiA7pgyneKknR29AwBM77 so any payments from strongcoin held accounts are easily traced back to the site.


I was asked by 2 separate people on this forum if I could hold the funds (Sorry to the people I didn't reply to). The evidence that these funds came from the heist seemed plausible to me.

At 8am yesterday morning the funds were intercepted when the user made a payment.

https://blockchain.info/address/1DsFCAZaxhJ9YGw5X8NCW9VkSMDZMyXzMF

I've spoken to the user in question over email. The user says he sold a car for BTC but can't reveal who to due to an NDA agreement.

Graeme and I had a conversation over the phone and some evidence came to light, that to me, made it very likely the user I have contact with was connected to the heist. I'm not going to reveal any details of the user accept to legal authorities if asked. I believe we should abide by due process.

I have sent a link to this post to the user so he/she can comment. Otherwise in the next few hours I will return the funds to Graeme, he can then decide what happens to those funds.

Thanks dogisland
17ABbLZPYwWzsSquYsKxfWAzMcWuNJZBna
is a fresh address
and a great relief Smiley
Graeme
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
Public Disclosure.

On Saturday afternoon I was notified that Strongcoin was holding 568 BTC believed to be from the Ozcoin theft. Everytime you make a payment from StrongCoin the fee goes to 1STRonGxnFTeJiA7pgyneKknR29AwBM77 so any payments from strongcoin held accounts are easily traced back to the site.


I was asked by 2 separate people on this forum if I could hold the funds (Sorry to the people I didn't reply to). The evidence that these funds came from the heist seemed plausible to me.

At 8am yesterday morning the funds were intercepted when the user made a payment.

https://blockchain.info/address/1DsFCAZaxhJ9YGw5X8NCW9VkSMDZMyXzMF

I've spoken to the user in question over email. The user says he sold a car for BTC but can't reveal who to due to an NDA agreement.

Graeme and I had a conversation over the phone and some evidence came to light, that to me, made it very likely the user I have contact with was connected to the heist. I'm not going to reveal any details of the user accept to legal authorities if asked. I believe we should abide by due process.

I have sent a link to this post to the user so he/she can comment. Otherwise in the next few hours I will return the funds to Graeme, he can then decide what happens to those funds.

That's a strong stand, and I'm grateful you have the guts to make it. Good show!
sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
Public Disclosure.

On Saturday afternoon I was notified that Strongcoin was holding 568 BTC believed to be from the Ozcoin theft. Everytime you make a payment from StrongCoin the fee goes to 1STRonGxnFTeJiA7pgyneKknR29AwBM77 so any payments from strongcoin held accounts are easily traced back to the site.


I was asked by 2 separate people on this forum if I could hold the funds (Sorry to the people I didn't reply to). The evidence that these funds came from the heist seemed plausible to me.

At 8am yesterday morning the funds were intercepted when the user made a payment.

https://blockchain.info/address/1DsFCAZaxhJ9YGw5X8NCW9VkSMDZMyXzMF

I've spoken to the user in question over email. The user says he sold a car for BTC but can't reveal who to due to an NDA agreement.

Graeme and I had a conversation over the phone and some evidence came to light, that to me, made it very likely the user I have contact with was connected to the heist. I'm not going to reveal any details of the user accept to legal authorities if asked. I believe we should abide by due process.

I have sent a link to this post to the user so he/she can comment. Otherwise in the next few hours I will return the funds to Graeme, he can then decide what happens to those funds.
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
Graet,
Keep up the great work and glad to see the site functioning again Smiley
DrG
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1035
Just wondering did everyones total credit get reset to 0 cause of the hack i see a last payment on the 19 that i never got im guessing thats when the hacker recieved all the payouts.

Yeah I went to 0 and the scumbag took my 1+ BTC  Angry
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Power to the people!
Just wondering did everyones total credit get reset to 0 cause of the hack i see a last payment on the 19 that i never got im guessing thats when the hacker recieved all the payouts.
vip
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
Looks like there's still cached shares / history to catch up with.

I show unconfirmed credits even though it is *way* past twenty hours since I submitted a share.

NP. Just FYI.
if you are on DGM you will be paid for several rounds after you stop mining, it is the "tail off"
Yep, expect that.

Here's some data. Just in case it is useful.

If you wish / need, I'll PM you the account name.
Although I doubt this is an anomaly specific to me.

Just trying to help work through the transition effects.

I don't think you would be out of line to suggest to just give it a day and see if it settles out. I'm merely reporting what I see now.

"DGM
Round Credit*:
0.00000982 BTC
Unconfirmed Credit:
0.03981841 BTC"

"232427   2013-04-19 14:56:14   1,490   0.00293916   0.00000000   0.00000197   Completed"
cool, cheers Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Looks like there's still cached shares / history to catch up with.

I show unconfirmed credits even though it is *way* past twenty hours since I submitted a share.

NP. Just FYI.
if you are on DGM you will be paid for several rounds after you stop mining, it is the "tail off"
Yep, expect that.

Here's some data. Just in case it is useful.

If you wish / need, I'll PM you the account name.
Although I doubt this is an anomaly specific to me.

Just trying to help work through the transition effects.

I don't think you would be out of line to suggest to just give it a day and see if it settles out. I'm merely reporting what I see now.

"DGM
Round Credit*:
0.00000982 BTC
Unconfirmed Credit:
0.03981841 BTC"

"232427   2013-04-19 14:56:14   1,490   0.00293916   0.00000000   0.00000197   Completed"
vip
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
I hit the site. And logged in.

Looks like you are back on-line.

Congratulations.

And my sincere best wishes.

-- edit

Looks like there's still cached shares / history to catch up with.

I show unconfirmed credits even though it is *way* past twenty hours since I submitted a share.

NP. Just FYI.
if you are on DGM you will be paid for several rounds after you stop mining, it is the "tail off"

Fantastic the pool is getting back up.
Hopefully you were able to tackle this issue, so this doesn't reoccur up.

I will change my miners back to your pool when I get back from work.

I noticed in the payout screen, the "unsuccessful payout" (to the hacker) is still listed as payout.
Is this going to be corrected/send out later again?

I asked for this to be done before we went live
will investigate what is going on :/
Pages:
Jump to: