Pages:
Author

Topic: [~1 BTC Bounty] - page 3. (Read 4638 times)

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 5622
Non-custodial BTC Wallet
November 18, 2020, 08:15:46 AM
I'm trying to use this page: https://bitcoindata.science/plot-your-transaction-in-mempool.html but nothing happens when I enter the TX 7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd - I'm going to see if I can reach out to @bitmover for help on this one.

Nothing happened because that transaction is not in the mempool of the blockexplorer I use  (sochain.com)

I tried to search for that transaction in blockchair, blockstream, and a few more, nothing.
https://blockstream.info/tx/7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd

That transaction is not being broadcasted. Nodes are probably rejecting it.

Pools might also be afraid of losing the block reward if they include that transaction in a block (and node reject that block, marking transaction as invalid)

I will take a look and I will try to broad cast that transaction in a few more places. Let's see if it works.

edit:

I tried to rebroadcast it in blockcstream and got this error
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 18, 2020, 07:45:24 AM
I'm trying to use this page: https://bitcoindata.science/plot-your-transaction-in-mempool.html but nothing happens when I enter the TX 7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd - I'm going to see if I can reach out to @bitmover for help on this one.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 15, 2020, 07:56:11 AM
Given no other node sees the TX even hours after blockcypher accepts the TX I'm beginning to wonder what they are doing with the TX and whether or not they rebroadcast it, or just hold it in their mempool for ~ 18 hours?

We don't know the exact behavior of blockcypher, but assuming they do, they can't broadcast to another node which have different rule such as don't accept transaction with non-standard script (which is OP problem) or only accept transaction with fee at least 1 sat/vbyte.

So what I'm wondering I guess is is blockcypher mining and therefore (maybe) going to add the tX to a block if/when they find one? Or, are they just reporting that the TX has been "broadcast" (albeit just to their node) and no one else is picking up the TX to mine it?




Right now if the transaction that is continually broadcasted on Blockcypher is mined, Timelord receives the agreed bounty. I am not in need of anyone else to do what Timelord is doing at the current moment, but if Timelord gives up, I may talk to you privately.

Edit: As @nc50lc said, it's not a problem to figure out who mined it - and I'm not offering an extra bounty besides the transaction fee to any miners unless they contact me directly beforehand.

I don't mind rebroadcasting for the foreseeable future.
member
Activity: 79
Merit: 36
November 15, 2020, 07:22:09 AM
hi i have put your transaction in accelearation with my private method
7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd
we will see if work
if work i will wait for the bounty

Hi, thanks for finding interest in helping me. However, unless you can explain what you are doing and come to an agreement with me beforehand, you cannot partake in this bounty.

For example, I offered Timelord a $1,000 bounty if the transaction he is re-broadcasting on Blockcypher gets confirmed.

I offered to help you with this issue long time ago.
But i was told by someone that i could not do this...
It's somewhere in the early pages of this thread.

Now i have one question.
How are you planning to identify the one that pushed it through ?



Right now if the transaction that is continually broadcasted on Blockcypher is mined, Timelord receives the agreed bounty. I am not in need of anyone else to do what Timelord is doing at the current moment, but if Timelord gives up, I may talk to you privately.

Edit: As @nc50lc said, it's not a problem to figure out who mined it - and I'm not offering an extra bounty besides the transaction fee to any miners unless they contact me directly beforehand.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 5531
Self-proclaimed Genius
November 15, 2020, 07:21:22 AM
Now i have one question.
How are you planning to identify the one that pushed it through ?
Asking for a signed message using the block's coinbase transaction's output would suffice.
I think that's enough since the user can prove that he's the miner of the block where the txn was included
since he got the private key of the address used for the coinbase transaction.

If no one can, it must have been mined by a random miner that accepted it from push services that accepted the txn.
In that case, Timelord2067 wins the bounty because no one else disclosed that they'll keep pushing it.
member
Activity: 180
Merit: 38
November 15, 2020, 07:03:28 AM
hi i have put your transaction in accelearation with my private method
7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd
we will see if work
if work i will wait for the bounty

Hi, thanks for finding interest in helping me. However, unless you can explain what you are doing and come to an agreement with me beforehand, you cannot partake in this bounty.

For example, I offered Timelord a $1,000 bounty if the transaction he is re-broadcasting on Blockcypher gets confirmed.

I offered to help you with this issue long time ago.
But i was told by someone that i could not do this...
It's somewhere in the early pages of this thread.

Now i have one question.
How are you planning to identify the one that pushed it through ?

legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 15, 2020, 06:24:10 AM
P.S. The IP address shown on blockcypher (3.95.194.185) is not reachable.

I think you'll find the IP is actually where the TX was lodged from.  I'm using TOR explorer, (but I wasn't online at the time that was resubmitted, so that's not my I.P. or the exit point from TOR)

This was me just now:



Given no other node sees the TX even hours after blockcypher accepts the TX I'm beginning to wonder what they are doing with the TX and whether or not they rebroadcast it, or just hold it in their mempool for ~ 18 hours?
legendary
Activity: 1039
Merit: 2783
Bitcoin and C♯ Enthusiast
November 15, 2020, 12:04:30 AM
https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/ continues to accept the TX - but only holds the TX in their mempool for about eighteen hours, so there are occasions when the rebroadcast misses a couple of hours.
If you had the IP address of any of the nodes that accept this transaction you could directly send the tx to them without needing to go through a block explorer.
P.S. The IP address shown on blockcypher (3.95.194.185) is not reachable.
legendary
Activity: 3458
Merit: 6231
Crypto Swap Exchange
November 14, 2020, 10:53:38 AM
hi..i am an old miner and I have contacts with important pools like f2pool and antpool
this transaction is peculiar
USH TRANSACTION ERROR: 64: NON-MANDATORY-SCRIPT-VERIFY-FLAG (USING NON-COMPRESSED KEYS IN SEGWIT)
only a private pool can broadcast
I ask to participate in the bounty .. thanks to my knowledge

Sure you are....https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2816586
Go away scammer the OP is trying to deal with a legitimate issue, don't need your BS here.

Side note I did the rounds of PMing the usual people again.
I also still have it sitting in my private solo setup.

-Dave
newbie
Activity: 78
Merit: 0
November 14, 2020, 07:26:49 AM
hi..i am an old miner and I have contacts with important pools like f2pool and antpool
this transaction is peculiar
USH TRANSACTION ERROR: 64: NON-MANDATORY-SCRIPT-VERIFY-FLAG (USING NON-COMPRESSED KEYS IN SEGWIT)
only a private pool can broadcast
I ask to participate in the bounty .. thanks to my knowledge
member
Activity: 79
Merit: 36
November 14, 2020, 06:52:13 AM
hi i have put your transaction in accelearation with my private method
7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd
we will see if work
if work i will wait for the bounty

Hi, thanks for finding interest in helping me. However, unless you can explain what you are doing and come to an agreement with me beforehand, you cannot partake in this bounty.

For example, I offered Timelord a $1,000 bounty if the transaction he is re-broadcasting on Blockcypher gets confirmed.
newbie
Activity: 78
Merit: 0
November 14, 2020, 06:29:28 AM
Hello!

Your request for the acceleration of transaction confirmation is accepted and included in the queue of requests for acceleration (more than 500 transactions).

TXid: 7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd
Amount: 5.8748055 BTC


If you are lucky, you will receive confirmation soon.
newbie
Activity: 78
Merit: 0
November 14, 2020, 06:10:07 AM
hi i have put your transaction in accelearation with my private method
7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd
we will see if work
if work i will wait for the bounty
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 13, 2020, 10:44:51 PM
Told you it isn't worth-it.

Well I think it is worth it as I've managed to find and add quite a few new sites to my [Guide] Broadcast Your RAW Transaction (Push TX) BTC & Alts coins.

At any rate,


All show the same thing:



I don't recommend sending these sites any funds unless you are really sure you ( leventturksoy ) want to try going down that path as the link to view the TX is broken (site does not have TX).
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 5531
Self-proclaimed Genius
November 13, 2020, 10:37:45 PM
cryptocurrency360.com/bitcoin-accelerator says the transaction has already been confirmed, -snip-
That's one of the fake accelerators out in the web.
The description below blows it all, it just re-broadcasts transactions instead of including them to the block that they're mining.
It must have mistook the error in broadcasting the transaction into thinking that it's already confirmed.

Quote from: Timelord2067
Do you want to risk a "Child pays for parent" transaction?
That's only possible if the transaction is also included in his own node,
and the child transaction will also be rejected by those who've rejected the parent because the child's input(s) will be missing in that case.

Told you it isn't worth-it.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 13, 2020, 09:29:14 AM
After about a week of continuous broadcasting still no confirmation.

I think that whoever can get me in contact with someone from F2Pool will likely claim this bounty. Or any major pool willing to accept a non-standard transaction really.

I've been rebroadcasting the transaction daily as agreed:

Just broadcasted it

I'll continue to rebroadcast it occasionally. If you re-broadcast it and it gets mined, I agree to pay you a $1000 reward.

https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/ continues to accept the TX - but only holds the TX in their mempool for about eighteen hours, so there are occasions when the rebroadcast misses a couple of hours.

As I said in PM I am looking to find block explorers that also rebroadcast (but don't show up in google etc searches for rebroadcasting).




Recent additional sites:





Do you want to risk a "Child pays for parent" transaction?




*edit* 14th Nov.

https://cryptocurrency360.com/bitcoin-accelerator/ says the transaction has already been confirmed, but Block Cypher says it is unconfirmed.






Am also trying out this:


https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=app.jjandj.broadcaster
https://github.com/JJandJ/Broadcast-Transaction




https://confirmbtc.net/tx/7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd






https://clickbee.me/btctx/



http://freebtcaccelerator.com/

member
Activity: 79
Merit: 36
November 13, 2020, 08:31:02 AM
After about a week of continuous broadcasting still no confirmation.

I think that whoever can get me in contact with someone from F2Pool will likely claim this bounty. Or any major pool willing to accept a non-standard transaction really.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 05, 2020, 04:24:36 AM
Okay, one with lower fee:

Code:
01000000000101c0ee957139541ad18cb3367a4dd0606bbc8c5bd1585ce64e813c5c21359e3f6e0000000017160014ef3247d77adecb1f22692e899931e75e1a5cbb26ffffffff01e63d04230000000017a9146b4e110311345ba00ff2bb77d569e7f4a0651c6387024830450221008467643b0f6be6b9c47020bbc824908b5b391a752e416fefcba597d2be1ad5db02200756619fe6db4bcd694dbee6e0fdc332f06a7b187dd3de6e756c6f7c21d3bdde0141044b8d17d6f5fae04c9213da069f4e9fdd25df5f567f867a6a957a850c45a602b788c4a699afacbca54cfc5ba0cd659f20575f2fb20eee6ed73cf8bb7dd95e3fd200000000

Just broadcasted it

Am broadcasting ...

Will retry every few hours for a while and post update of where I have posted it to as I go.

Code:
01000000000101c0ee957139541ad18cb3367a4dd0606bbc8c5bd1585ce64e813c5c21359e3f6e0000000017160014ef3247d77adecb1f22692e899931e75e1a5cbb26ffffffff01e63d04230000000017a9146b4e110311345ba00ff2bb77d569e7f4a0651c6387024830450221008467643b0f6be6b9c47020bbc824908b5b391a752e416fefcba597d2be1ad5db02200756619fe6db4bcd694dbee6e0fdc332f06a7b187dd3de6e756c6f7c21d3bdde0141044b8d17d6f5fae04c9213da069f4e9fdd25df5f567f867a6a957a850c45a602b788c4a699afacbca54cfc5ba0cd659f20575f2fb20eee6ed73cf8bb7dd95e3fd200000000




*edit

  • https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/ - Error validating transaction: Transaction with hash 7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd already exists..
  • https://coinb.in/#broadcast - non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit) (code 64)
  • https://btc.com/tools/tx/publish - There was an error pushing your transaction to network! Did you sign your transaction? Is this double spend? Have you already sent this transaction?  (Which could be that node is seeing the first TX...)
  • https://blockchain.info/pushtx - Code: -26, Error: non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit)
  • https://www.mocacinno.com/push.php - unsuccesfull, probably because some of the inputs for this tx were removed from the UTXO set (used in a confirmed transaction)
  • https://www.smartbit.com.au/txs/pushtx - PUSH TRANSACTION ERROR: 64: NON-MANDATORY-SCRIPT-VERIFY-FLAG (USING NON-COMPRESSED KEYS IN SEGWIT)
  • BitCoin Core (V16) - 64: non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit) (code -26)
  • BitCoin Core Ver 20.1 - bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent (code -25) Perhaps it's detecting the original TX ??
  • https://btc.bitaps.com/broadcast - Broadcast transaction failed: non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit) Having said that however, the page DID show the actual transaction which the others don't...

7th Nov - another edit...

I've found yet more broadcast raw transaction sites (will add to the above list later)

blockcypher seems perfectly ok re-accepting the TX - confidence 48.3 % (watch this space)






Original TX with high fee: https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5274/52740059.html
member
Activity: 79
Merit: 36
November 05, 2020, 04:21:58 AM
Can you not use the raw transaction in the first post?

That's the "old" transaction (with the higher transaction fee) that gets rejected for a variety of fees (such as too high fee).

It will get rejected due to another reason: "too high fees". That includes blockcypher.

I've already tried posting that TX (see post from about a week ago which includes screen grabs of various nodes rejecting that TX)

How can there be a slim chance? Should I keep re-broadcasting in hopes that a small miner would accept it?
Yes,
Since 150+ nodes are still accepting it, there's a 'very very slim' chance that it will get into a mining nodes' mempool (that also accepts such transactions).
But re-broadcasting it after getting dropped isn't worth it, IMO.

I don't mind trying to broadcast the newer (lower fee paid) given there has been reports that the first TX has fallen out of the mempool and/or was never accepted in the first place.

He needs the one with the normal fee.

#Persistence

Okay, one with lower fee:

01000000000101c0ee957139541ad18cb3367a4dd0606bbc8c5bd1585ce64e813c5c21359e3f6e0 000000017160014ef3247d77adecb1f22692e899931e75e1a5cbb26ffffffff01e63d0423000000 0017a9146b4e110311345ba00ff2bb77d569e7f4a0651c6387024830450221008467643b0f6be6b 9c47020bbc824908b5b391a752e416fefcba597d2be1ad5db02200756619fe6db4bcd694dbee6e0 fdc332f06a7b187dd3de6e756c6f7c21d3bdde0141044b8d17d6f5fae04c9213da069f4e9fdd25d f5f567f867a6a957a850c45a602b788c4a699afacbca54cfc5ba0cd659f20575f2fb20eee6ed73c f8bb7dd95e3fd200000000

Just broadcasted it

I'll continue to rebroadcast it occasionally. If you re-broadcast it and it gets mined, I agree to pay you a $1000 reward.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 05, 2020, 04:17:10 AM
Can you not use the raw transaction in the first post?

That's the "old" transaction (with the higher transaction fee) that gets rejected for a variety of fees (such as too high fee).

It will get rejected due to another reason: "too high fees". That includes blockcypher.

I've already tried posting that TX (see post from about a week ago which includes screen grabs of various nodes rejecting that TX)

How can there be a slim chance? Should I keep re-broadcasting in hopes that a small miner would accept it?
Yes,
Since 150+ nodes are still accepting it, there's a 'very very slim' chance that it will get into a mining nodes' mempool (that also accepts such transactions).
But re-broadcasting it after getting dropped isn't worth it, IMO.

I don't mind trying to broadcast the newer (lower fee paid) given there has been reports that the first TX has fallen out of the mempool and/or was never accepted in the first place.

He needs the one with the normal fee.

#Persistence
Pages:
Jump to: