Bitcoin was named for "bit", which means "binary digit". It's one eighth of a byte.
So, the word "bitcoin" was created from "bit + coin" in the very same way like "goldcoin" was created from "gold + coin". I can't see a difference.
Also, there are a lot of people who say "millibit" for "millibitcoin", and 1 millibit is 1 thousandth of a bit(coin) in the very same way like 1 milligram is 1 thousandth of a gram.
all im reading from you is waffle and no logic in grammar.
bitcoin is bitcoin.... end of
i know i know you want to have a world where 100 satoshis is a bitcoin. but in your utopian dream of shouting to the world "i have a bitcoin" the rest of the world will just be laughing at you for only having 100 satoshi's..
you might aswell say in your utopian paradise that an ounce of gold is also a tonne and shout to the world you have several tonnes of gold, where in reality you only have a couple ounces
the world knows that a bitcoin is 100,000,000 satoshi's and so a bitcoin will always be 100,000,000 satoshis. and a bit.. (a totally separate word, will be a measurement of something smaller)
here is another examples.
an APP is not apple, an App is a small part of what apple is all about, apple has alot more involved then just APP's
and your use of millibits as your rebuttle
well applications uses the word app, but again an application is not Apple, its only part of Apple's infrustructure. so yes people have used words like app's, application's for years. that does not make app's or applications equal to Apple.
where as people have separated dogecoin and right from the start called them doge's and called terracoins terra's, etc, etc
bitcoin and litecoin are first generation cryptos and treated as single words.
all the other alts are the distant inbred cousins/copies and treated like double barrel names which are shortened off by taking the word coin away.