Topic: [~1000 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fee Pool, LP, SSL, Full Precision, and More - page 93. (Read 379078 times)
June 18, 2011, 11:08:42 PM
I'm getting tons of timeouts, disconnects and idle messages from east. What is going on?
June 18, 2011, 11:06:09 PM
UK Server has been disabled, get your miners off there ASAP. I'm sure he will update what is going as soon as he gets through working on it.
June 18, 2011, 11:00:54 PM
it's now fixed before i even realized
June 18, 2011, 11:00:14 PM
Looks like the uk.btcguild.com server is having technical difficulties, word in IRC is Eleuthria is actively working on it. If you have miners pointed there, you may want to pick another for now:
nl.btcguild.com
uswest.btcguild.com
useast.btcguild.com
uscentral.btcguild.com
Note: This is also effecting the My Accounts page, and APIs.
nl.btcguild.com
uswest.btcguild.com
useast.btcguild.com
uscentral.btcguild.com
Note: This is also effecting the My Accounts page, and APIs.
as posted earlier...
June 18, 2011, 10:56:44 PM
My account page seems to be down
my account is not reachable too...
June 18, 2011, 10:55:43 PM
same here, something's not working right
June 18, 2011, 10:50:17 PM
http://www.btcguild.com/my_account.php = blank page
http://www.btcguild.com/blocks.php = seemingly up-to-date info
Not clear on why one and not the other ...
http://www.btcguild.com/blocks.php = seemingly up-to-date info
Not clear on why one and not the other ...
June 18, 2011, 10:44:51 PM
Luck statistics were added to the block statistics page, for both a 24H window and since the difficulty change.
What do the percentages indicate? Variance from expected?
The percentages are related to the average shares per block in the past 24 hours/since difficulty change. Red numbers = bad luck, we're taking longer than average. Green = good luck, we're solving faster than average.
Just a little nit. The stats, at first glance, appear as if the blocks themselves are larger or smaller than difficulty would suggest [which happens]. One might read from the page that the blocks are larger than normal [when red/negative %], but it seems that you are indicating the number of shares submitted for the number of blocks earned won over a period of time? In that case, it still perplexes me, as the number of shares per solution should largely be the difficulty divided by the percentage of total network hashing power that BTC Guild wields. What am I missing?
To be fair, the same question can be asked of Deepbit too [I sort of always thought it indicated that larger blocks or smaller blocks than difficulty were been doled out for mining].
The more stats the better!
Understanding them exactly is an added plus [I have been working 14 hours straight today and my mind could be a bit addled].The 24 hour number is calculated by taking the average shares it took for each block solve that was done in the last 24h. So if the block's solve time was within 24 hours, it's share count is included to determine the 24h luck figure. So it's not exactly 24h, since a block may have been solved 23h 59m ago, but it was started an hour before that. However, this number gives a representation that is fair in my opinion. The comparison is to the current difficulty to determine if we were ahead or behind the average. It is our luck relative to difficulty, not our luck relative to overall network block production in the last 24 hours.
I looked back and clearly I wasn't thinking. The pool hash rate (as a percentage of the network or not) has nothing to due with luck ... luck doesn't have a rate, so clearly I wasn't thinking when I asked that question (yesterday was a long day of debugging code and addled my brain apparently
). It only makes sense that on average, if a round occurs entirely within the same difficulty period then on average, a block should be found in the number of shares represented by the difficulty number. I have no clue why my brain didn't process the obvious yesterday even being mentally fatigued.Thank you for the stats; they are useful (in an academic sense) and illustrates a sort of one glance summary of the block statistics.
June 18, 2011, 10:27:26 PM
Are we ever going to get email notifications back? That was one of the primary reasons I became a donator.
Is there a way to have BTC guild auto-pay? If so I missed it.
Not at the present time. (I think it's on his to do list though)
June 18, 2011, 10:25:04 PM
Are we ever going to get email notifications back? That was one of the primary reasons I became a donator.
Is there a way to have BTC guild auto-pay? If so I missed it.
June 18, 2011, 10:21:05 PM
Are we ever going to get email notifications back? That was one of the primary reasons I became a donator.
June 18, 2011, 10:05:00 PM
Looks like the uk.btcguild.com server is having technical difficulties, word in IRC is Eleuthria is actively working on it. If you have miners pointed there, you may want to pick another for now:
nl.btcguild.com
uswest.btcguild.com
useast.btcguild.com
uscentral.btcguild.com
Note: This is also effecting the My Accounts page, and APIs.
nl.btcguild.com
uswest.btcguild.com
useast.btcguild.com
uscentral.btcguild.com
Note: This is also effecting the My Accounts page, and APIs.
June 18, 2011, 10:01:02 PM
I connect to US servers but can't see my account on the website atm. It's unsettling not to know what my miners are doing.
I guess, given my limited understanding of the intricacies of how btc's are mined, that it's highly unlikely that the work my miners are doing could be coopted for someone else and/or my hard-earned btc's could get routed elsewhere?
If the above is virtually impossible, I'll sleep ok tonight. But just ok ...
N
I guess, given my limited understanding of the intricacies of how btc's are mined, that it's highly unlikely that the work my miners are doing could be coopted for someone else and/or my hard-earned btc's could get routed elsewhere?
If the above is virtually impossible, I'll sleep ok tonight. But just ok ...
N
June 18, 2011, 09:32:57 PM
UK server just went down
Edit: And now the NL server. What's going on?
Edit: And now the NL server. What's going on?
June 18, 2011, 09:30:13 PM
My account page seems to be down
June 18, 2011, 05:08:19 PM
I'd really like if we could get the following stats added:
On my account page: shares submitted in the last 24 hours for each miner
In the block statistics page:
Average time to complete a block in the past 24 hours
Average number of blocks completed in the past 7 days
I really love all the new enhancements to the site! Keep up the good work!
On my account page: shares submitted in the last 24 hours for each miner
In the block statistics page:
Average time to complete a block in the past 24 hours
Average number of blocks completed in the past 7 days
I really love all the new enhancements to the site! Keep up the good work!
June 18, 2011, 04:36:00 PM
Just wanted to say loving the changes to the site with the extra stats and whatnot. Only thing I am looking forward to is when automatic payouts gets setup. I am lazy so anything to help me be more lazy is a +
June 18, 2011, 12:33:32 PM
Just to make sure, your worker name being used is (for example): Faraday_GPU1. And how long is your password? It seems to have trouble try adding some garbage to the end of it if it's short. The pool doesn't check worker passwords, but some clients have a problem connecting with short/blank passwords.
Yes thats right, name_a1, name_a2 ect. my passwords were a1, a2 ect so i will try changing them.
edit: made the passwords longer and now i can connect, thanks!
June 18, 2011, 12:24:26 PM
poclbm.py --user=loginname_workername --pass=workerpass -o uswest.btcguild.com -p 8332 -d0 -v -w128 -agression=11
error is: Problems communication with bitcoin RPC
I have also tried
69.42.217.226
nl.btcguild.com
uk.btcguild.com
uswest.btcguild.com
useast.btcguild.com
uscentral.btcguild.com
None of these work.
But either mining.bitcoin.cz or deepbit.net with correct login works..
error is: Problems communication with bitcoin RPC
I have also tried
69.42.217.226
nl.btcguild.com
uk.btcguild.com
uswest.btcguild.com
useast.btcguild.com
uscentral.btcguild.com
None of these work.
But either mining.bitcoin.cz or deepbit.net with correct login works..
Just to make sure, your worker name being used is (for example): Faraday_GPU1. And how long is your password? It seems to have trouble try adding some garbage to the end of it if it's short. The pool doesn't check worker passwords, but some clients have a problem connecting with short/blank passwords.
June 18, 2011, 12:20:18 PM
I don't know if this has much (anything) to do with it, but you do know that AGGRESSION is for Phoenix not poclbm?
Jump to: