Date: 2018-02-25
Risked BTC amount: 0.0
Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20180225034202/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3014024.0
Quote from: nullius
Involved in trust farming. Confessed spammer #1183469 “trugad” said in referenced thread (q.v.), “how to earn a positive ‘trust’? I asked my clients to write me a positive opinion, but they do not count.” I checked #1183469’s trust feedback, and found in the pertinent time frame a slew of mostly generic, mostly undocumented feedback left in a patent (but futile) attempt to counteract a DT member’s negative “red trust” tag left for “trugad” on *2018-02-21*. This includes the following:
#1423659 “George51rus” to #1183469 “trugad”
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Meнeджep чтo нaдo, eгo бayнти вceгдa тoлкoвыe” (approximate translation: “The manager you need / the right manager, his bounty is always sensible”)
Moreover, on the same day as “George51rus” sent positive feedback to “trugad”, “George51rus” received positive feedback from #1224024 “ZhyravlikO”, who also that day sent positive feedback to “trugad”. “ZhyravlikO” had previously sent positive feedback to “trugad”, and is the *only* user who had ever done so before ibminer left negative feedback for “trugad”.
At the time of this writing, following are all feedbacks ever sent by #1224024 “ZhyravlikO”:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zhyravliko-1224024
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1423659 “George51rus”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “He пoдвeл, дoвepяю” (approximate translation: “Does not let me down, I trust [this person]”)
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Responsible, decent, worthy of approval”
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-01-26
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Excellent bounty manager!”
“trugad”:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1183469
From “trugad” having admitted soliciting trust, and simultaneous trust flowing “ZhyravlikO” → “trugad”, “ZhyravlikO” → “George51rus”, and “George51rus” → “trugad”, I conclude that “George51rus” is implicated in trust farming.
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nullian-trust-feedback-policy-working-draft-3009256
#1423659 “George51rus” to #1183469 “trugad”
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Meнeджep чтo нaдo, eгo бayнти вceгдa тoлкoвыe” (approximate translation: “The manager you need / the right manager, his bounty is always sensible”)
Moreover, on the same day as “George51rus” sent positive feedback to “trugad”, “George51rus” received positive feedback from #1224024 “ZhyravlikO”, who also that day sent positive feedback to “trugad”. “ZhyravlikO” had previously sent positive feedback to “trugad”, and is the *only* user who had ever done so before ibminer left negative feedback for “trugad”.
At the time of this writing, following are all feedbacks ever sent by #1224024 “ZhyravlikO”:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zhyravliko-1224024
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1423659 “George51rus”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “He пoдвeл, дoвepяю” (approximate translation: “Does not let me down, I trust [this person]”)
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Responsible, decent, worthy of approval”
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-01-26
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Excellent bounty manager!”
“trugad”:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1183469
From “trugad” having admitted soliciting trust, and simultaneous trust flowing “ZhyravlikO” → “trugad”, “ZhyravlikO” → “George51rus”, and “George51rus” → “trugad”, I conclude that “George51rus” is implicated in trust farming.
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nullian-trust-feedback-policy-working-draft-3009256
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO”
Date: 2018-02-25
Risked BTC amount: 0.0
Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20180225034202/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3014024.0
Quote from: nullius
Involved in trust farming. Confessed spammer #1183469 “trugad” said in referenced thread (q.v.), “how to earn a positive ‘trust’? I asked my clients to write me a positive opinion, but they do not count.” I checked #1183469’s trust feedback, and found in the pertinent time frame a slew of mostly generic, mostly undocumented feedback left in a patent (but futile) attempt to counteract a DT member’s negative “red trust” tag left *2018-02-21*.
Following are feedbacks pertinent to #1224024 “ZhyravlikO”. Note that at the time of this writing, this includes all trust feedback which “ZhyravlikO” has ever sent.
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1423659 “George51rus”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “He пoдвeл, дoвepяю” (approximate translation: “Does not let me down, I trust [this person]”)
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Responsible, decent, worthy of approval”
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-01-26
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Excellent bounty manager!”
#1423659 “George51rus” to #1183469 “trugad”
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Meнeджep чтo нaдo, eгo бayнти вceгдa тoлкoвыe” (approximate translation: “The manager you need / the right manager, his bounty is always sensible”)
“trugad”:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1183469
“George51rus”:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1423659
From “trugad” having admitted soliciting trust, and simultaneous trust flowing “ZhyravlikO” → “trugad”, “ZhyravlikO” → “George51rus”, and “George51rus” → “trugad”, I conclude that “ZhyravlikO” is implicated in trust farming.
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nullian-trust-feedback-policy-working-draft-3009256
Following are feedbacks pertinent to #1224024 “ZhyravlikO”. Note that at the time of this writing, this includes all trust feedback which “ZhyravlikO” has ever sent.
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1423659 “George51rus”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “He пoдвeл, дoвepяю” (approximate translation: “Does not let me down, I trust [this person]”)
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Responsible, decent, worthy of approval”
#1224024 “ZhyravlikO” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-01-26
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Excellent bounty manager!”
#1423659 “George51rus” to #1183469 “trugad”
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
Comment: “Meнeджep чтo нaдo, eгo бayнти вceгдa тoлкoвыe” (approximate translation: “The manager you need / the right manager, his bounty is always sensible”)
“trugad”:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1183469
“George51rus”:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1423659
From “trugad” having admitted soliciting trust, and simultaneous trust flowing “ZhyravlikO” → “trugad”, “ZhyravlikO” → “George51rus”, and “George51rus” → “trugad”, I conclude that “ZhyravlikO” is implicated in trust farming.
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nullian-trust-feedback-policy-working-draft-3009256
#896783 “sensei stupid”
Date: 2018-02-25
Risked BTC amount: 0.0
Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20180225034202/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3014024.0
Quote from: nullius
Involved in trust farming. Confessed spammer #1183469 “trugad” said in referenced thread (q.v.), “how to earn a positive ‘trust’? I asked my clients to write me a positive opinion, but they do not count.” I checked #1183469’s trust feedback, and found in the pertinent time frame a slew of mostly generic, mostly undocumented feedback left in a patent (but futile) attempt to counteract a DT member’s negative “red trust” tag left *2018-02-21*. This included the following:
#896783 “sensei stupid” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Comment: “he is a good people and im realy trust him. he so help full”
Reference link: (none)
“trugad”:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1183469
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nullian-trust-feedback-policy-working-draft-3009256
#896783 “sensei stupid” to #1183469 “trugad”:
Date: 2018-02-23
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Comment: “he is a good people and im realy trust him. he so help full”
Reference link: (none)
“trugad”:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1183469
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nullian-trust-feedback-policy-working-draft-3009256
I left off there, only because time constraints so necessitated. I may continue at any time.
At my exclusive discretion, I reserve the right to publicly post any PMs received by me (0) on the subject of negative trust feedback left by me, and/or (1) in relation to such a public discussion as this one.
Whines > /dev/null.