Pages:
Author

Topic: $1.4 Billion Invested in Bitcoin & Blockchain Investments - page 2. (Read 1067 times)

legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1024
Blockchain technologies ≠ Bitcoin

Just the opposite, development of commercial Blockchain use, especially by mainstream banks with fraud protection, will most certainly end any public desire for Bitcoin. Why would you use Bitcoin when you can have a professionally developed system that's automatically fully integrated into society?

Current Bitcoin devs can't rapidly solve the growing pains of Bitcoin. If some well financed company like Chase bank or Wells Fargo decided to throw money at "Blockchain Technology" it sure as hell wouldn't take a couple of years to solve the block size issue.

Bitcoins continued success still relies on young people (broke people) wanting to mine free money from the internet. How survivable will Bitcoin be in ten years when that's no longer possible?

I don't think so. Bitcoin remains highly attractive to a lot of people even if there are more convenient blockchain solutions by banks. We are about to enter a phase of high fiat price inflation, as central banks around the world have expanded the monetary excessively. Public debts have soared to extreme proportions. Under such circumstances, a non-inflationary and highly fungible currency like Bitcoin is perfectly suited for fiat capital flight.

With SegWit, developers made a great leap forward towards scaling Bitcoin in am efficient and decentralization-preserving way. I don't share your pessimism here.

Banks are using "Blockchain Technology" to provide centralized services. However the only reason for using a blockchain is enabling decentralization. Blockchain use comes with a huge loss of efficiency compared to traditional databases that makes no sense at all for centralized solutions. Banks will waste their money...

ya.ya.yo!
U2
hero member
Activity: 676
Merit: 503
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Blockchain technologies ≠ Bitcoin

Just the opposite, development of commercial Blockchain use, especially by mainstream banks with fraud protection, will most certainly end any public desire for Bitcoin. Why would you use Bitcoin when you can have a professionally developed system that's automatically fully integrated into society?

Current Bitcoin devs can't rapidly solve the growing pains of Bitcoin. If some well financed company like Chase bank or Wells Fargo decided to throw money at "Blockchain Technology" it sure as hell wouldn't take a couple of years to solve the block size issue.

Bitcoins continued success still relies on young people (broke people) wanting to mine free money from the internet. How survivable will Bitcoin be in ten years when that's no longer possible?

You would be surprised how long it takes a bank to implement something. It's not as quick as you're making it sound. I'm talking decades of talk before action.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074
The public will quickly see why $1.4 Billion is invested into Blockchain technology, when they notice the banks making more profits and the fees and

charges stay the same. They are just shifting the fiat system onto Blockchain technology... The concept is the same... They create the "token" in their

private Blockchain, and nobody can follow the chain, because it will not be transparent or open to the public. They can also create as much "tokens"

as they want, and adjust this without public consensus. This is definitely not Bitcoin.  Roll Eyes It's legalized Pump n Dump schemes.
full member
Activity: 149
Merit: 100
Bitcoins continued success still relies on young people (broke people) wanting to mine free money from the internet. How survivable will Bitcoin be in ten years when that's no longer possible?
that is correct as long as there is reward for mining people will be vested in this technology and when that is over they will search for more green pastures for sure and it is a puzzling question will the price remain at this level when there are no perks on offer.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
Blockchain technologies ≠ Bitcoin

Just the opposite, development of commercial Blockchain use, especially by mainstream banks with fraud protection, will most certainly end any public desire for Bitcoin. Why would you use Bitcoin when you can have a professionally developed system that's automatically fully integrated into society?

The people in the darknet market would prefer to use Bitcoin, so will the ransomware hackers, etc. There are also other niches where the underserved and the unbanked will prefer to use Bitcoin or because they have no choice. Bitcoin is serving and will be present in markets where the banks do not want to go into.

Quote
Current Bitcoin devs can't rapidly solve the growing pains of Bitcoin. If some well financed company like Chase bank or Wells Fargo decided to throw money at "Blockchain Technology" it sure as hell wouldn't take a couple of years to solve the block size issue.

Bitcoins continued success still relies on young people (broke people) wanting to mine free money from the internet. How survivable will Bitcoin be in ten years when that's no longer possible?

No. You are not seeing the whole picture. There are untapped markets where Bitcoin will be preferable. They will mostly be unregulated black market places and illegal but still potentially worth billions of $.
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Blockchain technologies ≠ Bitcoin

Just the opposite, development of commercial Blockchain use, especially by mainstream banks with fraud protection, will most certainly end any public desire for Bitcoin. Why would you use Bitcoin when you can have a professionally developed system that's automatically fully integrated into society?

Current Bitcoin devs can't rapidly solve the growing pains of Bitcoin. If some well financed company like Chase bank or Wells Fargo decided to throw money at "Blockchain Technology" it sure as hell wouldn't take a couple of years to solve the block size issue.

Bitcoins continued success still relies on young people (broke people) wanting to mine free money from the internet. How survivable will Bitcoin be in ten years when that's no longer possible?

I see your point on certain aspects, but surely using the banks method takes away one of the fundamental USP of Bitcoin, decentralisation.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
Blockchain technologies ≠ Bitcoin

Just the opposite, development of commercial Blockchain use, especially by mainstream banks with fraud protection, will most certainly end any public desire for Bitcoin. Why would you use Bitcoin when you can have a professionally developed system that's automatically fully integrated into society?

Current Bitcoin devs can't rapidly solve the growing pains of Bitcoin. If some well financed company like Chase bank or Wells Fargo decided to throw money at "Blockchain Technology" it sure as hell wouldn't take a couple of years to solve the block size issue.

Bitcoins continued success still relies on young people (broke people) wanting to mine free money from the internet. How survivable will Bitcoin be in ten years when that's no longer possible?
member
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
Leading PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) executive Seamus Cushley says $1.4 billion has been invested in blockchain startups so far this year. Cushley, director of fintech and digital at EMEA, will discuss blockchain’s evolution on November 8 at PwC’s Business Forum in Dublin.

https://news.bitcoin.com/1-4-billion-invested-blockchain-pwc/
Pages:
Jump to: